Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - The Session Border Controller As A Virtual Network Function
Articles

The Session Border Controller As A Virtual Network Function

Paul GermanBy Paul GermanFebruary 22, 2018Updated:July 4, 20244 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Simplicity is becoming a major selling point – especially when it comes to IT security. As organisations wake up to the huge additional requirements associated with the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that comes into force in 2018, any solution that can minimise complexity is compelling.

The use of Software Defined Networking to deliver a raft of essential security functions, from firewalls to intrusion detection, via a Virtual Network Function (VNF) model is testament to the growing recognition of the value of an out-sourced, yet on-premise, solution. However, the majority of these White Box services from Managed Service Providers (MSP) have a significant flaw: a lack of Voice over IP (VoIP) security.

As GDPR compliance becomes a priority, Paul German, CEO, VoipSec, explains the importance of the Virtual Network Function (VNF) based Session Border Controller (SBC) to lock down voice networks and deliver a complete, strength in depth White Box security solution.

Data Security Imperative

The introduction of GDPR in May 2018 is beginning to raise concerns for organisations – especially those mid-market companies that simply do not have the in-house expertise or skills required to meet the new, stringent requirements for safeguarding personally identifiable customer data.

In response, growing numbers of Managed Service Providers (MSPs) are offering White Box solutions to the market, providing an on-premise but outsourced solution for all of an organisation’s security needs – from firewalls to routers, intrusion detection to email security. Leveraging software-defined networking (SDN) to orchestrate services, this Virtual Network Function (VNF) model is extremely cost-effective; with no need for the MSP to provide on-site engineering support, new services can be downloaded and configured within minutes, rather than the days or weeks typically required.

This model also offers organisations a neat stepping stone to a wholesale shift to cloud-based IT, providing the chance to gain the benefits of offloading specific network functions that are both costly and difficult to manage whilst also gradually writing off asset value and gaining the required trust in the cloud to support a wholesale migration.

Missing VoIP 

To date, however, these White Box VFN solutions have had one major flaw: a complete lack of VoIP security. Where is the value of spinning up routers, firewalls, email security and anti-virus when an essential component of the strength in depth security model is overlooked? Global losses attributable to telecoms fraud are estimated at US$29.2bn annually – and the UK is the third most prevalent country for the origination of fraudulent calls according to the CFCA 2017 Global Fraud Loss Survey.

Just consider the incredibly sensitive customer data that is now discussed and shared via VoIP networks – from the identifying information provided at call centres onwards. In addition to the risk of toll fraud, unsecured VoIP networks are vulnerable to hackers listening in and collecting this customer data, or using this network to gain access to the applications and databases used within the call centre. Furthermore, hackers could use an unsecured VoIP connection as a way into the MSP’s network via the White Box, creating a far broader vulnerability.

Strength in Depth

So what is the answer? To be fair, with the hardware-based Session Border Controllers (SBC) required to secure a VoIP connection needing on-site deployment, until recently most MSPs have taken the decision that the cost and complexity of securing VoIP was too high. More recently, however, that model has shifted towards software-based SBCs that can be upgraded in response to new security risks.

Even more interestingly, there has also been a move towards cloud-based SBC deployments that leverage community collaboration to combat escalating threats, from toll fraud to telephony denial of service and voice mail hacking attacks. With this software-based model, SBCs can now also be deployed as a Virtual Network Function – and for MSPs that means the risk versus cost equation has changed fundamentally. With VFN based SBCs less complex, less expensive and able to be spun up alongside all the other security components of the White Box solution, it is now both fast and cost-effective to secure the VoIP network.

Extended VFN

In the current climate, companies cannot afford to be distracted from essential business operations by complex compliance demands. And, given the potential fines for non-compliance to GDPR, ignoring the risks of unsecured personally identifiable data is also not an option.

For MSPs facing up to customer demands for a simple GDPR solution, plus the escalating risks associated with the changing threat landscape, a cost-effective VFN option is becoming compelling. MSPs leveraging the VFN model to deliver a White Box solution that takes away all the issues of deployment and upgrade have a strong proposition – but it is essential to address every aspect of the security risk: and that includes VoIP.

Paul German

Paul German, CEO at Certes Networks

  • Paul German
    SASE – The Risk Of Over-rationalising
  • Paul German
    Government Cloud On-Ramping
  • Paul German
    High Assurance Delivers SD-WANs For All
  • Paul German
    Harvest Now, Decrypt Later

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Visual data is the blind spot in enterprise security: that’s about to change

May 4, 20267 Mins Read

Making stolen data worthless: why security must start with the data

March 30, 20265 Mins Read

Meta’s Smart Glasses Privacy Scandal Expands After Sama Credentials Found on the Dark Web

March 10, 20264 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}