Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Security and the State of Application Delivery
Articles

Security and the State of Application Delivery

Brian A. McHenryBy Brian A. McHenryJanuary 28, 2015Updated:December 30, 20213 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

F5 Networks released their 2015 State of Application Delivery report this week. When we think of application delivery and the associated appliance, the Application Delivery Controller (ADC), we instantly associate a number of features, functionalities, and other characteristics. For many, the ADC will always be first and foremost, a load-balancer, designed to enable applications to scale beyond a single server. For others, the ADC provides SSL offload, content-based switching, caching, and other connection optimizations. Regardless, security is still not the first thing that leaps to mind as a core function of the ADC despite the SSL capabilities.

So it comes as no surprise that availability and performance trump security among those surveyed for the State of Application Delivery report. It is tempting to attribute this response to sample bias since the survey respondents are largely ADC administrators. However, anyone who has worked as a security practitioner – architect, engineer, or otherwise – can attest that availability and performance almost always trump security. That being said, web application firewall (WAF), access management gateway, and DDoS mitigation are common features of many ADC solutions. These advanced security features are often only possible on the ADC owing to the visibility owed to the aforementioned SSL termination features.

It would be easy to be cynical, in this age of high-profile breaches, DDoS attacks, and critical vulnerabilities, to decry the notion that availability and performance should ever trump security. Though I’m focused on security these days, my career has been spent largely supporting and building systems with availability and performance in mind. Security will always come second because an application that isn’t both available and responsive will see little use, rendering security measures moot. Raising the philosophical question, if a web site is attacked in the forest and no one sees it, does it make a sound?

Rather than be cynical, I find it encouraging that the survey respondents, whose roles are likely primarily focused on availability and performance, have listed security as the #2 concern immediately after their primary tasks. This data point signals to me that security is becoming more visible and infused into every area of the infrastructure. In customer conversations, we’re seeing big shifts in attitudes about SSL termination at the ADC. In environments where previously the only requirements were load-balancing, SSL is in play not for the performance benefit, but rather for the purposes of centralized and enforceable encryption policy, validated by the 73% of respondents planning SSL/TLS offload projects in 2015. As I’ve written previously, the trend toward an all-HTTPS Internet is accelerating at an unprecedented pace. With the waves of SSL vulnerabilities, and the increasing load on web applications that may have been previously unencrypted, the ADC is becoming an ever more vital part of the infrastructure, and not “just a load-balancer”.

Beyond encryption, most respondents listed application access control, single sign-on (SSO), and identity federation as projects planned for the coming year. An overwhelming 87% of respondents planned to deploy WAF next year, which narrowly edged out IDS/IPS at 86%. Anti-DDoS projects were on the 2015 calendar for 79% of respondents.

The ADC stakeholders clearly have visibility into the increasing demands of infrastructure security, and a part to play in the successful deployment of many security solutions. Even though security is the #2 concern when it comes to application delivery, it couldn’t be more vital to the practice of application delivery. Coming in second place in this report is still a big win for security.

Brian_McHenry
Brian A. McHenry

As a Senior Security Solutions Architect at F5 Networks, Brian McHenry focuses on web application and network security. McHenry acts as a liaison between customers and F5 product teams, providing a hands-on, real-world perspective. He is a regular contributor on InformationSecurityBuzz.com, a co-founder of BSidesNYC, and a speaker at AppSecUSA, BC Aware Day, GoSec Montreal, and the Central Ohio Infosec Summit, among others. Prior to joining F5 in 2008, McHenry, a self-described IT generalist, held leadership positions within a variety of technology organizations, ranging from startups to major financial services firms.

  • Brian A. McHenry
    The WAF Is Not Enough
  • Brian A. McHenry
    Access Management, With A Side Order Of Identity
  • Brian A. McHenry
    The Internet of Thingbots
  • Brian A. McHenry
    Black Hat USA 2017: Bigger and Better (?)

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Visual data is the blind spot in enterprise security: that’s about to change

May 4, 20267 Mins Read

Making stolen data worthless: why security must start with the data

March 30, 20265 Mins Read

Meta’s Smart Glasses Privacy Scandal Expands After Sama Credentials Found on the Dark Web

March 10, 20264 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}