Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Cybersecurity Awareness Top of Mind for Internal Auditors, Protiviti Survey Finds
Articles

Cybersecurity Awareness Top of Mind for Internal Auditors, Protiviti Survey Finds

ISB Editorial StaffBy ISB Editorial StaffMarch 6, 2015Updated:July 4, 20245 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Protiviti Survey
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Board engagement and the audit plan are keys to addressing cyber risks effectively

According to From Cybersecurity to Collaboration: Assessing the Top Priorities for Internal Audit Functions, a new survey report released today by global consulting firm Protiviti, internal audit professionals are making strides in meeting cybersecurity and data privacy standards. Much work remains, with many of the surveyed organisations rating themselves as less than “very effective” at addressing their cybersecurity risks. However, the results are significantly better for organisations in which the board of directors has a high level of engagement with information security risks, and those that include cybersecurity in the annual audit plan.

“Across the globe, businesses are continuing to experience cybersecurity issues, challenges and breakdowns. Our survey shines a light on the evolving set of challenges faced by internal audit professionals as they work to incorporate cybersecurity frameworks into business processes,” said Brian Christensen, executive vice president, global internal audit and financial advisory, Protiviti. “Those professionals who continue to engage board members and define cybersecurity measures within their annual audit plans will be poised to effectively mitigate future threats.”

More than 800 internal audit professionals, including chief audit executives (CAEs), participated in Protiviti’s ninth annual survey to assess the top priorities for internal audit functions. Along with a review of cybersecurity management and processes, the survey assessed general technical knowledge, audit process knowledge, and personal skills and capabilities.

Driving Cybersecurity Protection

Protiviti’s survey shows a clear, positive correlation between a high level of board engagement in information security (30 percent of respondents) and an organisation’s ability to acceptably manage cybersecurity risk. There is a similar relationship between having defined cybersecurity measures in the annual audit plan and the successful management of cybersecurity risk. For example:

– Nearly half of organisations with a high level of board engagement (47 percent) rate themselves as “very effective” at identifying cybersecurity risk, compared to just 19 percent of other organisations.

– Seventy percent of organisations that include cybersecurity in the audit plan have a cybersecurity risk strategy in place, compared to 42 percent of other companies.

More than half of this year’s respondents (53 percent) note that cybersecurity evaluation has been included in their current audit planning. Of those organisations, 60 percent have used the NIST Cybersecurity Framework to measure and evaluate existing programs.

Across respondents, many CIOs have also taken particular interest in collaboration with the audit committee, reporting on both cybersecurity and IT related risks (43 percent).

According to survey participants, the top five most significant cybersecurity risks are:

1. Data security (company information)

2. Brand/reputational damage

3. Regulatory and compliance violations (tie)

4. Data leakage (tie)

5. Viruses and malware

In its report, Protiviti offers 10 recommended action items that CAEs and internal audit professionals should consider implementing as part of their ongoing efforts to help their organisations strengthen cybersecurity.

Technical Knowledge – Top Five Priorities
Internal audit professionals assessed their competency in 35 areas of technical knowledge, indicating whether their knowledge is adequate or requires improvement. Based on these findings, the top areas for technical knowledge improvement include:

1.Data Analysis Technologies (GTAG 16)

2. NIST Cybersecurity Framework

3. Mobile Applications

4. Continuous Assurance

5. The Guide to the Assessment of IT Risk (GAIT)

Audit Process Knowledge – Top Five Priorities
Respondents also evaluated 35 areas of audit process knowledge in terms of improvement. These top priorities include:

1. Auditing IT security

2. Computer-assisted audit tools (CAATs)

3. Data analysis tools for data manipulation

4. Marketing internal audit internally

5. Monitoring fraud

As in previous years, the results show that internal auditors are intent on improving the way they leverage technology to analyse data and create new efficiencies to free up resources. Results also indicate an increased desire to adhere to new guidance and standards in order to advance existing IT audit plans, and more effectively communicate the importance of these audit practices to key stakeholders.

Personal Skills and Capabilities

In addition to enhancing skills in new technology and applications, internal auditors remain committed to increasing collaboration with other departments and functions in the organisation. CAEs and internal audit professionals seek to improve and leverage their personal skills such as persuasion, their relationships with board members, and their internal and external networks in order to balance multiple priorities and strengthen the function’s strategic contributions to the organisation.

About the Survey
Protiviti’s survey was fielded between September and October 2014. A majority of the survey participants work in publicly traded and privately held companies and represent virtually all industry sectors. A small percentage of respondents work for government and non-profit organisations. The full report, From Cybersecurity to Collaboration: Assessing the Top Priorities for Internal Audit Functions, with survey results and analysis is available here.

Additional Resources Available: Webinar, Video, Podcast and Infographic
Protiviti will conduct a complimentary webinar about the study on March 24 at 5:00pm G.M.T..  The 90-minute webinar is eligible for CPE credit* and will feature Christensen and David Brand, a Protiviti managing director and leader of the firm’s IT audit practice, exploring the survey’s results. Please register for the webinar at here. Additionally, both a podcast featuring Christensen and Brand discussing insights of the survey results and a video are also available, along with an infographic, on the Protiviti website.

About Protiviti
???????????????????
Protiviti is a global consulting firm that helps companies solve problems in finance, technology, operations, governance, risk and internal audit, and has served more than 40 percent of FORTUNE 1000® and FORTUNE Global 500®companies. Protiviti and its independently owned Member Firms serve clients through a network of more than 70 locations in over 20 countries. The firm also works with smaller, growing companies, including those looking to go public, as well as with government agencies.

Protiviti is a wholly owned subsidiary of Robert Half (NYSE: RHI). Founded in 1948, Robert Half is a member of the S&P 500 index.

ISB Editorial Staff
  • ISB Editorial Staff
    Navigating the Cyber Threat Landscape: Key Insights from Trellix ARC’s Q1 2023 Report
  • ISB Editorial Staff
    Experts’ Responses: Cyber Security Predictions 2022
  • ISB Editorial Staff
    ISB Virtual Conference: Key Cyber Security Challenges and Solutions in 2021
  • ISB Editorial Staff
    Cyber Security Predictions 2021: Experts’ Responses

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Roundcube RCE Vulnerability Disclosed Early Amid Active Exploitation

June 10, 20255 Mins Read

Roblox Under Fire: Lawsuit Alleges Secret Data Tracking of Kids

May 13, 20254 Mins Read

Fake Indian Government Portal Used to Spread Cross-Platform Malware in Suspected APT36 Campaign

May 13, 20253 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}