Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Regulations and Compliance - NIST Debuts First Set of Finalized Post-Quantum Encryption Standards
Regulations and Compliance Data Protection Encryption Latest News News & Analysis Positive News Security

NIST Debuts First Set of Finalized Post-Quantum Encryption Standards

ISB Staff ReporterBy ISB Staff ReporterAugust 14, 2024Updated:November 8, 20243 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
NIST Post-Quantum Encryption
NIST Post-Quantum Encryption
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

The US Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has officially released its first set of finalized encryption standards designed to withstand attacks from quantum computers. These post-quantum encryption standards are expected to secure a wide array of electronic information, from confidential emails to vital e-commerce transactions.

NIST has urged computer system administrators to begin transitioning to these new standards without delay, emphasizing the importance of early adoption to safeguard digital infrastructure from potential quantum threats.

A Leap Forward in Quantum-Resistant Security

Developed in response to the rapid development of quantum computing technology, which experts predict could break current encryption methods within a decade, the three new encryption standards are the culmination of an eight-year effort to protect digital information against the looming threat of quantum computing.

“Quantum computing is set to revolutionize various fields, but it also presents significant security challenges,” said Laurie Locascio, Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and NIST Director. “These finalized standards are NIST’s commitment to ensuring that quantum advancements do not compromise our digital security.”

The Road to Post-Quantum Cryptography

NIST launched the Post-Quantum Cryptography project in 2016, and by the end of that year, formally invited cryptography experts worldwide to submit algorithms that would be secure against both classical and quantum computers. Within about a year, experts from numerous countries had submitted 69 candidate algorithms that met NIST’s stringent criteria.

NIST then made these 69 candidate algorithms available for analysis, challenging experts to break them if they could. This evaluation process was conducted in an open and transparent manner. Over the following years, many of the world’s leading cryptographers participated in several rounds of assessment, gradually narrowing down the pool of candidates.

NIST has also encouraged global cryptographers to evaluate the candidate algorithms’ performance on powerful computers and smartphones, as well as devices with limited processing power. This includes smart cards, small devices like smart kitchen appliances within the Internet of Things, and individual microchips, all of which require quantum-resistant algorithms.

“The advancement of quantum computing reaffirms America’s status as a global technological powerhouse,” added Deputy Secretary of Commerce Don Graves. “NIST’s post-quantum cryptography standards are a critical part of our efforts to secure our economic future.”

Details of the New Standards

The new standards cater to two primary cryptographic needs: general encryption and digital signatures. The finalized standards include:

  1. Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 203: Based on the CRYSTALS-Kyber algorithm, now renamed ML-KEM (Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism), this standard is intended as the primary method for general encryption. It is favored for its small encryption keys and operational speed.
  2. FIPS 204: Designed to protect digital signatures, this standard uses the CRYSTALS-Dilithium algorithm, now renamed ML-DSA (Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm).
  3. FIPS 205: Also for digital signatures, this standard employs the Sphincs+ algorithm, now renamed SLH-DSA (Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Algorithm), which serves as a backup to ML-DSA in case of vulnerabilities.

Looking Ahead

While NIST continues to evaluate additional algorithms that may serve as backup standards, the current set of standards is ready for immediate implementation. “There is no need to wait for future standards,” advised Dustin Moody, the mathematician heading NIST’s PQC standardization project. “Go ahead and start using these three. We need to be prepared in case of an attack that defeats the algorithms in these three standards, and we will continue working on backup plans to keep our data safe. But for most applications, these new standards are the main event.”

As quantum computing technology progresses, NIST remains dedicated to updating and expanding these standards to ensure the security of digital information well into the future.

ISB Staff Reporter
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    Mass Exploit Lets Attackers Install Plugins Arbitrarily
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    Cyberattacks Soar 47% Globally – Attacks on Education Increase by 73%
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    CISA Warns of Two Known Exploited Vulnerabilities
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    JFrog Becomes an AI System of Record, Debuts JFrog ML

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The Real Purpose of the UK’s Online Safety Act: An Expert Explains

August 13, 20256 Mins Read

Google Drops Trust in Chunghwa Telecom and NetLock Root Certificates Over Compliance Failures

June 4, 20254 Mins Read

Policy Statement Sheds Light on Upcoming UK Cybersecurity Bill

April 4, 20254 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}