Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Critical Infrastructure Security - Strengthening Healthcare Cybersecurity: Lessons from Recent Supplier Attacks
Critical Infrastructure Security Articles Attacks Ransomware Security Threat Intelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities

Strengthening Healthcare Cybersecurity: Lessons from Recent Supplier Attacks

Errol WeissBy Errol WeissSeptember 10, 2024Updated:November 8, 20245 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Healthcare Cybersecurity
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

The global healthcare system has become increasingly integrated with third-party medical suppliers in recent years. These suppliers are vital in providing essential services, medical equipment, pharmaceuticals, and digital tools that healthcare organizations depend on to operate efficiently.

However, while these integrations have undeniably enhanced efficiency across the medical supply chain, they have also created new vulnerabilities – vulnerabilities that cybercriminals are exploiting.

In the past few months, three critical medical suppliers – OneBlood, Synnovis, and Octapharma – have fallen victim to sophisticated cyberattacks by Russian ransomware groups. These breaches led to widespread disruptions in healthcare services, from delays in blood supplies to the compromise of plasma centers and the destruction of critical medical samples.

This growing threat highlights the urgent need for healthcare organizations to reassess their cybersecurity strategies, particularly those related to protecting their supply chains.

New approaches to cybercrime

In the past, malicious actors have typically focused their attacks on individual healthcare organizations, seeking to breach systems and steal sensitive patient data to sell or use for ransom demands. However, as the recent attacks on OneBlood, Synnovis, and Octapharma show, cybercriminals have discovered a new, more disruptive approach.

For instance, the July 30 attack on Florida-based blood supplier OneBlood triggered a software outage that disrupted blood shipments across the region, forcing the organization to label supplies to maintain distribution manually. Similarly, the June 3 attack on Synnovis disrupted blood sample processing in London, causing thousands of hospital and medical appointments to be rescheduled. On April 15, a ransomware attack on Octapharma led to the shutdown of 190 plasma centers across the U.S., which exposed sensitive donor information.

Each attack was executed by separate Russian ransomware groups, targeting critical suppliers within the healthcare system and triggering widespread disruptions across multiple healthcare organizations. This shift in tactics exposes a glaring weakness in the healthcare supply chain and highlights the need for a more comprehensive approach to cybersecurity in healthcare. The next wave of attacks could be far more coordinated, amplifying the potential for cascading failures across the system, with even more significant consequences for patient care, medical services, and overall healthcare operations.

Fortifying cybersecurity resilience

A key component in all the above attacks was the lack of redundancies for critical suppliers. The absence of backup systems and alternative providers left healthcare organizations scrambling to restore essential services and maintain patient care. To avoid such cases in the future, healthcare organizations should diversify their supplier base and incorporate multiple providers for mission-critical services. This approach ensures that if one supplier is compromised, others can fill the gap.

Healthcare organizations should also invest in robust backup systems and regularly test their contingency plans to ensure smooth operations during unexpected outages. Ideally, healthcare organizations should be able to sustain their operations and maintain care quality for at least 30 days during a disruption.

In addition, organizations should establish a third-party risk management (TPRM) committee to assess and monitor their critical suppliers continuously. This committee should identify vulnerabilities, evaluate risk, and ensure that all third-party partners adhere to strong cybersecurity practices.

The TPRM committee should emphasize suppliers that are critical single points of failure – those for which there are no suitable alternatives. If these suppliers are compromised, it could lead to significant disruptions in essential services. The committee should work to identify these high-risk suppliers and develop strategies to manage and mitigate those supplier risks effectively.

Coordinating intelligence

In conjunction with the above efforts, healthcare organizations should collaborate to share intelligence on evolving cyber threats. This collaboration involves establishing robust communication networks and sharing real-time threat information, such as indicators of compromise, attack methods, and vulnerabilities. By pooling insights and experiences, healthcare organizations can enhance their ability to detect, respond to, and mitigate cyber threats more effectively.

Collaborative partnerships like the one between Health-ISAC and the American Hospital Association (AHA) exemplify this approach by broadly facilitating the exchange of critical information and best practices across the healthcare provider community. Engaging in such partnerships and networks provides valuable insights into emerging threats and promotes collective resilience within the healthcare sector.

Furthermore, active participation in these networks encourages continuous learning and adaptation, allowing organizations to refine their defenses and response strategies in real time. As cyber threats become more sophisticated, a unified approach to intelligence sharing and collaboration will become increasingly beneficial in maintaining the integrity of healthcare systems and protecting patient data.

Final thoughts

The recent rise in sophisticated cyberattacks on critical medical suppliers highlights a significant vulnerability in healthcare. As healthcare organizations increasingly rely on third-party suppliers, these suppliers have become attractive targets for cybercriminals. To enhance resilience, healthcare organizations must diversify suppliers, invest in solid backup systems, and create comprehensive contingency plans. Additionally, improved cybersecurity requires more effective intelligence sharing. With cyber threats growing more coordinated and severe, a combined approach that includes strong internal measures and external collaboration is crucial. By implementing these strategies, healthcare organizations can better safeguard operations, maintain service integrity, and secure patient data against the growing cyber threat landscape.

Errol Weiss

Errol Weiss, Health-ISAC Chief Security Officer, has over 25 years of experience in Information Security beginning his career with the National Security Agency. He created and ran Citigroup’s Cyber Intelligence Center and was a Senior Vice President Executive with Bank of America’s Global Information Security team.

  • Errol Weiss
    “Recovery Is the New Prevention”: a Q&A with CSO of Health-ISAC, Errol Weiss
  • Errol Weiss
    Securing Health Data in 2025: The Rising Cybersecurity Challenges

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The evolution of cyber risk: Addressing geopolitical threats

May 13, 20265 Mins Read

“Recovery Is the New Prevention”: a Q&A with CSO of Health-ISAC, Errol Weiss

May 7, 20266 Mins Read

Pro-Russian threat actors target Swedish heat and power plant in failed cyberattack

April 20, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}