Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Regulations and Compliance - Mozilla Faces Legal Complaint Over Firefox’s New “Privacy Preserving” Tracking Feature
Regulations and Compliance Application Security Latest News News & Analysis Security

Mozilla Faces Legal Complaint Over Firefox’s New “Privacy Preserving” Tracking Feature

ISB Staff ReporterBy ISB Staff ReporterSeptember 27, 2024Updated:November 8, 20243 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Firefox
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Non-profit privacy watchdog noyb (None of Your Business) has filed a formal complaint against Mozilla, accusing the tech company of enabling a controversial tracking feature in its Firefox browser without user consent.

The feature, dubbed “Privacy Preserving Attribution” (PPA), was introduced in a recent update and has sparked concern over the browser’s handling of user privacy.

Despite its name, the feature allows Firefox to track user behavior across websites—taking control of tracking from individual websites and shifting it to the browser itself. While Mozilla claims this approach is less invasive than traditional cookie tracking, noyb argues that users were not informed about the new functionality, and it was turned on by default.

Following Google’s Lead?

The new feature appears to mirror Google’s previous attempts at similar tracking technologies, such as the now-defunct Privacy Sandbox. Rather than placing tracking cookies, websites must request Firefox to store data on users’ interactions with ads. Mozilla contends that PPA improves user privacy by aggregating data and preventing individual sites from collecting personal information. However, noyb contends that Firefox is simply facilitating another form of tracking without user consent.

Felix Mikolasch, a data protection lawyer at noyb, criticized Mozilla’s approach, saying Mozilla has bought into the narrative that the advertising industry has a right to track users. “While Mozilla may have had good intentions, it is very unlikely that ‘privacy preserving attribution’ will replace cookies and other tracking tools. It is just a new, additional means of tracking users.”

Tracking Enabled by Default

Mozilla’s decision to enable the feature without seeking user permission compounds concerns. The tracking system is activated automatically with the latest software update, and users are not notified. The only way to disable the feature is through a sub-menu in the browser’s settings, making it difficult for the average user to opt out.

“It’s a shame that an organisation like Mozilla believes that users are too dumb to say yes or no. Users should be able to make a choice and the feature should have been turned off by default,” Mikolasch added.

Possible GDPR Violations

The complaint, filed with Austria’s data protection authority (DSB), claims that Mozilla’s actions violate the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Under the law, companies are required to obtain explicit consent from users before processing their personal data. Noyb has called for the DSB to investigate Mozilla’s practices and demands that the company switch to an opt-in system and delete any data collected without user consent.

The case could have significant implications for millions of Firefox users across Europe, as Mozilla’s reputation as a privacy-focused alternative to Chromium-based browsers now comes into question.

Mozilla has yet to publicly respond to the complaint.

ISB Staff Reporter
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    Mass Exploit Lets Attackers Install Plugins Arbitrarily
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    Cyberattacks Soar 47% Globally – Attacks on Education Increase by 73%
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    CISA Warns of Two Known Exploited Vulnerabilities
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    JFrog Becomes an AI System of Record, Debuts JFrog ML

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The Real Purpose of the UK’s Online Safety Act: An Expert Explains

August 13, 20256 Mins Read

Google Drops Trust in Chunghwa Telecom and NetLock Root Certificates Over Compliance Failures

June 4, 20254 Mins Read

Policy Statement Sheds Light on Upcoming UK Cybersecurity Bill

April 4, 20254 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}