Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Network Security - GoDaddy’s Cybersecurity Called into Question
Network Security Latest News News & Analysis Security

GoDaddy’s Cybersecurity Called into Question

Adam ParlettBy Adam ParlettJanuary 28, 20254 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
GoDaddy
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a complaint that GoDaddy has violated Section 5 of the FTC Act pertaining to “unfair methods of competition” through “unfair or deceptive acts or practices.”

The complaint details how GoDaddy’s failure to implement standard security tools and practices for protecting the environment where it hosts customers’ websites and data, coupled with the insufficient monitoring of said environment for security threats, contradicted their promotional claim to be a secure option for hosting.

The FTC Won’t Let Me Be

The FTC asserts that “GoDaddy’s data security program was unreasonable for a company of its size and complexity.” Supporting this position by identifying specific key failings, namely to inventory and manage assets, manage software updates, assess risks to its services, implement multi-factor authentication, log security-related events, monitor for threats, segment its network, and secure connections to services with consumer data.

These failures, the FTC states, have resulted in “several major compromises of its hosting service between 2019 and 2022, in which threat actors repeatedly gained access to its customers’ websites and data.” By its very nature, this access placed GoDaddy’s customers, their customers’ websites, and their customers’ consumers in harm and their sensitive data at risk.

Is GoDaddy Still the Go-to?

For individuals and companies looking to get their business online with a domain name or start a website, blog, online store, or e-commerce site, GoDaddy has, for many years, been the go-to. Since its inception in 1997, GoDaddy has been on a self-proclaimed mission to empower entrepreneurs worldwide by providing them with the tools required to grow in the online space.

In terms of growing their business and obtaining customer trust, their mission has been undeniably successful thus far. At the time of writing, the GoDaddy homepage states that customers have entrusted them with 82 million domain names, and they feature their Trustpilot TrustScore of 4.8 out of 5 stars, aggregated from over 114,000 reviews. Since at least 2015, it has promoted itself as a secure option for hosting, highlighting its commitment to data security and threat monitoring. However, this complaint cites GoDaddy’s data security measures as inadequate and their security claims misleading.

Whatever Next?

In order to resolve the issues raised by the FTC and align GoDaddy’s policies and procedures with its messaging, the FTC has proposed a settlement order. The order is currently subject to public comment for 30 days; if it is eventually finalized, then a violation could result in a civil penalty of up to $51,744.

The proposed order can be summarised into three key points. Firstly, it will prevent GoDaddy from making false claims about its security and privacy compliance. Secondly it will require GoDaddy to establishment a comprehensive information security program to protect its web hosting services. Finally, it will mandate the hiring of an independent assessor for initial and biennial evaluations of this program.

Industry Analysis

The story has potentially serious implications for the industry, and it has elicited somewhat mixed reactions to both the complaint and the proposed order.

Ilia Kolochenko, CEO of ImmuniWeb and a Fellow at the British Computer Society (BCS), believes that the settlement sends several important messages. A direct message to web hosting companies underlining the importance of data security, as well as to companies conducting ‘any Internet business without due care about your cybersecurity and privacy programs’ that the FTC will act on your negligence.

The well-respected technology news publication The Register strikes a different tone, however. It likens the action being faced by GoDaddy from the FTC to “being slapped with a wet lettuce” and is surprised at the lack of a fine when they have been identified as having years of “lax security” and experienced “several major breaches.”

Adam Parlett
Adam Parlett

Adam Parlett is a cybersecurity marketing professional who has been working as a project manager at Bora for over two years. A Sociology graduate from the University of York, Adam enjoys the challenge of finding new and interesting ways to engage audiences with complex Cybersecurity ideas and products.

  • Adam Parlett
    Apache Tomcat Under Siege 2: Well-Hidden Payload
  • Adam Parlett
    NIST Adds SandboxAQ’s HQC as Their Newest PQC Standard
  • Adam Parlett
    Policy Statement Sheds Light on Upcoming UK Cybersecurity Bill
  • Adam Parlett
    New Lazarus Group Scam Targets Crypto Jobseekers

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Major US telecom providers debut C2 ISAC to counter AI-driven threats

May 26, 20264 Mins Read

FCC Blocks Foreign-Made Routers, Citing National Security Risks

March 26, 20268 Mins Read

Cutting Into Overtime, Not Corners: How Network Automation Drives Business Value

March 13, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}