Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Artificial Intelligence - Bad Actors Target DeepSeek in LLMJacking Attacks
Artificial Intelligence Attacks Latest News News & Analysis

Bad Actors Target DeepSeek in LLMJacking Attacks

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleFebruary 10, 2025Updated:February 10, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
DeepSeek
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Cybercriminals are rapidly evolving their tactics for exploiting large language models (LLMs), with recent evidence showing a surge in LLMjacking incidents. Since Sysdig TRT first discovered LLMjacking in May 2024,  it says attackers have continuously adapted, targeting new models such as DeepSeek and monetizing stolen credentials through proxy services. 

The rapid rise of DeepSeek, an advanced AI model, has not gone unnoticed by malefactors. Following the release of DeepSeek-V3 on 26 December 2024, attackers integrated it into OpenAI Reverse Proxy (ORP) instances within days. A similar pattern followed the launch of DeepSeek-R1 on 20 January this year, highlighting the speed at which threat actors adopt new AI models. 

According to Sysdig TRT, multiple ORP instances containing DeepSeek API keys have been found, indicating widespread exploitation. ORP servers, which act as intermediaries for accessing LLM services, have become a major tool for LLMjackers, enabling unauthorized access to AI models while masking user identities. 

The Business of Stolen Credentials

Sysdig TRT’s latest investigation uncovered a thriving underground market for stolen AI credentials. One example is an ORP proxy hosted at vip[.]jewproxy[.]tech, which sells access through a storefront for $30 per month. The extensive use of these proxies suggests that multiple cybercriminals are leveraging stolen keys to bypass paywalls and reduce AI usage costs. 

A snapshot of one ORP instance revealed staggering statistics: 

  • Total tokens used: Over 2 billion 
  • Estimated total cost: Nearly $50,000 in just 4.5 days 
  • Claude 3 Opus usage: 865.59 million tokens, costing an estimated $38,951.55 
  • Stolen API keys: Multiple from OpenAI, Google AI, AWS, and Microsoft Azure 

These figures highlight the financial impact of LLMjacking, where legitimate cloud account holders are left with exorbitant bills from unauthorized AI usage. 

How LLMjackers Operate

The misuse of OpenAI Reverse Proxy (ORP) technology is central to LLMjacking, as it lets threat actors route AI requests through reverse proxies, fly under the radar, and facilitate large-scale abuse. Sysdig researchers found multiple exposed ORPs using stolen credentials, with attackers leveraging cloud services such as AWS and Azure for unauthorized AI interactions. 

Credential theft is another key component of LLMjacking operations. Malicious actors obtain credentials through vulnerable services—such as Laravel—or extract them from exposed software packages in public repositories. Once obtained, stolen credentials are verified using automation scripts before being exploited for AI model access. 

The Growing LLMjacking Underground

The rise of LLMjacking is fueling an underground economy, with communities forming to share tools and techniques. Cybercriminals frequently communicate via platforms such as Discord and 4chan, with many using pastebin-style sites like Rentry.co to distribute access details. 

Sysdig TRT identified over 20 ORP proxies, with some using TryCloudflare tunnels to obscure their origins. Logs from cloud honeypots showed how attackers using LLM-generated Python scripts to interact with ORPs, again, illustrating the sophistication of these operations. 

The Urgency for Better AI Security

LLMjacking is a very real financial risk in terms of data security. Unauthorized AI access can lead to sensitive data leaks, corporate espionage, and further cyberattacks. Entities depending on cloud-based LLMs can strengthen their defenses by implementing stricter access controls, monitoring API usage, and securing credentials to prevent unauthorized access. 

As LLMs continue to advance, so too will the tactics of cybercriminals. Entities can stay ahead of these threats by adopting robust cybersecurity measures to safeguard their AI resources from exploitation. 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

What Are AI SOC Agents? Use Cases, Architecture, and the Leading Vendors

June 19, 20266 Mins Read

AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals

June 19, 20265 Mins Read

From AI hype to operational reality: A practitioner’s framework for securing agentic systems

June 5, 20267 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}