Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Application Security - Critical Flaws in Appsmith Exposed Systems to Full Takeover
Application Security Latest News News & Analysis RCE Security Threat Intelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities

Critical Flaws in Appsmith Exposed Systems to Full Takeover

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleMarch 27, 2025Updated:March 27, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Appsmith
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Rhino Security researchers have identified multiple critical vulnerabilities in Appsmith, an open-source developer platform commonly used for building internal applications. The most severe of these is CVE-2024-55963, which enables unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands on servers running default installations of Appsmith versions 1.20 through 1.51. 

Remote Code Execution as PostgreSQL User 

Appsmith ships with a local PostgreSQL database for practice and learning purposes, but the researchers discovered a critical misconfiguration in its default setup. The PostgreSQL authentication configuration file (pg_hba.conf) allowed any local user to connect as any PostgreSQL user without needing a password.  

The vulnerability became exploitable thanks to Appsmith’s default configuration permitting new user signups. Malefactors could register an account, create a workspace, add an application, and connect to the misconfigured database, and once connected, they could use PostgreSQL’s COPY FROM PROGRAM function to execute arbitrary system commands with the privileges of the PostgreSQL user. 

Technical Exploitation Path 

The researchers demonstrated a proof-of-concept exploit involving SQL commands that allowed malicious actors to: 

  • Create a temporary table. 
  • Execute Unix commands like cat to read system files. 
  • Retrieve results and remove evidence by dropping the table. 

Two other significant vulnerabilities were also found: 

  1. CVE-2024-55964: An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) flaw allowed users with minimal permissions to access SQL databases by exploiting predictable datasource IDs via the /api/v1/datasources/[datasource-id]/schema-preview API endpoint. 
  1. CVE-2024-55965: A DoS vulnerability let users with limited permissions repeatedly restart applications through broken access controls in the restart API functionality. 

Impact and Mitigation 

These vulnerabilities put any firm using Appsmith at risk. CVE-2024-55963 is particularly critical as it allowed complete system compromise from an unauthenticated position. Threat actors could gain persistent access by registering accounts, creating workspaces, connecting to the database, and executing system commands. 

Appsmith has worked with Rhino Security Labs to patch all three vulnerabilities: 

  • CVE-2024-55963: Fixed in version 1.52 by hardening PostgreSQL configurations and requiring password-based authentication. 
  • CVE-2024-55964: Addressed in version 1.49 by implementing proper role-based access controls. 
  • CVE-2024-55965: Resolved in version 1.48 through improved access control checks for restart functionality. 

Entities are strongly advised to upgrade to version 1.52 or later immediately to mitigate these risks. Security researchers have also released technical analyses and detection tools, including Nuclei templates for scanning vulnerable instances. 

Ship Faster, Build Smarter, Secure Everything 

Mayur Upadhyaya, CEO of APIContext, says this vulnerability shines a light on delivery chain risk: “When an unauthenticated endpoint can connect to an unauthenticated database, it creates an open door for attackers. Think of it like a block of flats; just because someone gets into the building doesn’t mean they should have a key to every apartment. Yet in many default setups, every door is left unlocked. Appsmith, like many internal tools, is powerful but when shipped with insecure defaults, such as exposed local databases, it can unintentionally expand the attack surface.” 
 
He says we’re asking a lot from developers today: ship faster, build smarter, and secure everything. “But without clear guardrails and automated visibility, mistakes happen. You can’t fix what you can’t see. In an API-first world, internal tools blur into external risk, making proactive testing for exposed PII and public endpoints a necessity, not a luxury.” 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

AppSec is dead, long live AI security

April 29, 20265 Mins Read

Managing App Access on Frontline Devices in an Always-On World

March 9, 20264 Mins Read

OWASP Top 10 2025: New Enemies, Old Foes, and an Approach to Vulnerability Remediation That Must Evolve

January 22, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}