Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Supply Chain Security - Under the Surface: Subtle Ways Cyberattacks Cripple Manufacturing
Supply Chain Security Articles Attacks Critical Infrastructure Security Security Threats and Vulnerabilities

Under the Surface: Subtle Ways Cyberattacks Cripple Manufacturing

Lou FarrellBy Lou FarrellOctober 24, 20255 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Cyberattacks Cripple Manufacturing
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Cyberattacks in the manufacturing sector are evolving faster than many organisations can adapt. While high-profile threats like ransomware and DDoS attacks dominate the headlines, subtle and less visible tactics can quietly disrupt production, damage reputations, and even compromise safety.

1.   Third-Party Infiltration Makes Seeking Outside Assistance Perilous

Businesses often rely on third-party vendors to provide materials that become the products they sell or software that keeps their facilities running. Larger entities with 10,000 or more staff maintain an average of 173 third-party relationships, with many respondents saying that increasing outside pressure and the 2020 pandemic made such partnerships necessary. However, the more relationships a brand has, the harder it is to track them all.

The same survey found that only 11% of organisations have full visibility across all tiers of their suppliers. Another 12% said they have no visibility at all, while 19% were unsure how to address the problem.. This significant lack of transparency is an enormous benefit for cyberattackers, who can then slip in alongside vendors undetected.

2.   Data Manipulation Requires Staff to Stay Vigilant

Following a successful attack, employees must watch for subtle changes in product quality that could mean threat actors tampered with important data. It is easier to notice big damage like a shut-down factory line or information theft, but some might leave subtler traces of their breach.

For instance, attackers who gain access to digital design files or CNC machine inputs could make small alterations, changing dimensions, materials, or finishes that compromise performance without immediate signs of error. Such changes may only surface later as premature wear, product failures, or customer complaints, underscoring the need for staff to stay alert to even minor irregularities.

3. Compromised Design Files Pose Hidden Risks

Some manufacturing systems rely on downloading digital design files to operate machinery. Cyberattackers can exploit this process by embedding malicious code within those files, leading to equipment malfunctions, software corruption, or data leaks. Even when downloads come from trusted sources, a single compromised file can disrupt production or expose valuable intellectual property. Regular validation and malware scanning of all design inputs are essential to prevent such subtle breaches.

4. Insider Threats Are a Must-Monitor

Unfortunately, humans aren’t machines — they are going to make mistakes now and then. Though 83% of companies saw at least one insider attack in 2024, the main reasons weren’t frustration with higher-ups or intent to cause damage before quitting or being fired. Four key factors driving insider threats were:

  • Complex IT ecosystems
  • Outdated security practices
  • Insufficient training and awareness
  • Poor enforcement of access controls

Because the cybersecurity landscape is also rapidly changing, businesses often struggle to keep pace. Frequently shifting recommendations can cause confusion or frustration, leading to noncompliance that opens attack vectors.

Real-World Examples of Cyberattacks in Manufacturing

IBM has also found manufacturing to be the most targeted sector for cyberattacks over the last four years. However, if that is not enough encouragement to prioritize cybersecurity, here are a few examples of manufacturing cyberattacks to showcase the havoc they can wreak.

Unimicron

In February 2025, PCB manufacturer Unimicron disclosed that it had been targeted by the ransomware group Sarcoma. The group claimed to have exfiltrated 377 gigabytes of data, leveraging phishing emails and n-day vulnerabilities to infiltrate systems, move laterally across the software environment, and extract sensitive information. Within its first month of activity, Sarcoma had already compromised 36 victims — a stark reminder of the ongoing importance of employee training and timely security updates.

Clorox

The Clorox breach serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of third-party visibility and workforce awareness. In 2023, the cleaning products giant reported a cyberattack that disrupted its supply chain and delayed shipments to retailers. The aftermath cost the company an estimated $380 million, with roughly $50 million spent on remediation and the remainder attributed to lost sales and operational downtime.

Applied Materials

That same year, Applied Materials announced that an attack on one of its suppliers was expected to cost the company around $250 million. Although it did not identify the affected partner, many pointed to MKS Instruments, which had recently suffered a ransomware incident disrupting order processing and shipments. As one expert observed, it was telling that MKS had to explicitly state that the breach “had a material impact,” underscoring how more business leaders are now recognizing that cyber threats carry very real financial and operational consequences.

How to Strengthen Defenses Against Subtle Threats

Even with strong firewalls and multi-factor authentication in place, many risks can slip through unnoticed. The following steps can help manufacturers reduce exposure to smaller, harder-to-detect attacks:

  1. Vet vendors and technology carefully – Regularly assess third-party partners and the equipment they provide to ensure they meet security standards. Keep critical or legacy systems offline where possible, and segment networks to limit the spread of potential breaches.
  1. Verify downloads and digital assets – Always scan files, software updates, and design downloads for malicious code, even when they come from trusted sources. After an incident, recheck digital designs and system configurations to confirm they haven’t been altered.
  1. Prioritize staff training and incident readiness – Employees who understand how to identify phishing attempts, data manipulation, and social engineering are less likely to fall victim to them. A clear incident response plan helps maintain order and minimizes disruption when attacks occur.

Securing the Future of Manufacturing

Cybersecurity is no longer optional for manufacturers; it is a core part of operational resilience. Protecting digital systems, supply chains, and connected equipment requires a coordinated effort between leadership, IT teams, and frontline staff. By treating security as a shared responsibility, manufacturers can safeguard productivity, trust, and innovation for the long term.

Lou Farrell
Lou Farrell

Lou, the Senior Editor of Revolutionized, has had a life-long passion for writing. Over the past several years, he’s honed his skills covering topics in the fields of Technology and Manufacturing, hoping to inspire and educate others.

    The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

    Related Posts

    OpenAI rotates certificates after TanStack supply chain attack hits employee devices

    May 18, 20264 Mins Read

    LiteLLM supply chain attack exposes millions to credential theft

    March 30, 20265 Mins Read

    Group IB Report: Attackers Are Industrializing Supply Chain Compromise

    February 17, 20264 Mins Read
    ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

     
    ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
    Black ISB Logo

    Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

    X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

    Working With Us

    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    Write For Us

    • How To Contribute

    The Pages

    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • AI Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Copyright Notice

    Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Manage Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}