Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Malware - Fake Tech Support Scams Deliver Advanced Command-and-Control Malware
Malware Attacks Endpoint Security Latest News News & Analysis Phishing Security Social Engineering

Fake Tech Support Scams Deliver Advanced Command-and-Control Malware

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleMarch 5, 20262 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Fake Tech Support Scams
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Fake tech support scams are not new. Historically, the goal was simple: convince someone to hand over a few hundred dollars in gift cards or give attackers remote access to a computer. 

However, new research from Huntress highlights how familiar social-engineering tricks are evolving into something far more insidious. Instead of small-scale fraud, malefactors are using fake support calls to deploy sophisticated command-and-control malware inside business networks.  

In a campaign observed in February 2026, bad actors first flooded organizations with spam emails. Then they followed up with phone calls posing as IT support staff, offering to “fix” the problem.  

Victims were persuaded to approve remote-access sessions using tools like QuickAssist or install remote management software such as AnyDesk. Once inside the system, the attackers guided users through a fake “Outlook Antispam Control Panel,” which downloaded what looked like a legitimate patch.  

That patch was far from innocuous. It installed a customized version of the Havoc command-and-control framework, a post-exploitation toolkit aimed at managing compromised machines.  

The actors didn’t rely on stock malware either. The Havoc payload had been heavily modified with techniques specifically tailored to slip past modern endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools.  

These included DLL sideloading, indirect system calls to bypass security hooks, and registry-based fallback command-and-control channels for resilience in the event that primary servers were disrupted.  

Once inside, the operators moved quickly. In one environment, they spread from the initial compromised machine to nine additional endpoints in roughly eleven hours. Persistence mechanisms included scheduled tasks, malicious DLLs, and even legitimate remote monitoring tools deployed by the attackers themselves.  

The broader message is that while the technical sophistication of these campaigns is growing, the entry point is still stubbornly human. 

Attackers are still exploiting trust. They simply combine old-fashioned phone scams with modern offensive security frameworks. 

For defenders, that’s a reminder that even the most advanced technical controls can be bypassed if an attacker convinces someone to open the door. 

You can read the full report here. 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Dutch police, NCSC take down major botnet
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Palo Alto warns of active exploitation of GlobalProtect authentication bypass flaw

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

When PUPs bite: Huntress uncovers “weaponised” adware exposing 25,000+ systems

April 16, 20262 Mins Read

Americans Lost Over $20 million in ATM “Jackpotting” Attacks

February 24, 20263 Mins Read

ESET Discovers First Android Malware to Abuse Generative AI for Dynamic UI Manipulation

February 20, 20263 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}