Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Artificial Intelligence - AI-Powered Fraud: How Cybercriminals Target Finance Teams—and How to Stop Them
Artificial Intelligence Articles Industry Insights Security

AI-Powered Fraud: How Cybercriminals Target Finance Teams—and How to Stop Them

Shai GabayBy Shai GabayMarch 13, 2025Updated:March 20, 20255 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
AI
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Last year, employees at the UK-based engineering firm, Arup, were tricked by a deepfake video of the company’s CFO into transferring $25 million to cybercriminals. This isn’t an anomaly. It’s further proof that social engineering has become cybersecurity’s most costly problem. 

Today, more cybercriminals are launching AI-powered social engineering attacks targeting finance teams and executives, principally those in vendor-facing roles with access to funds and the authority to modify payment details and approve wire transfers. Whether it’s an AI-generated phishing campaign, a fake Invoice in payment initiation, or a deepfake impersonation, the success rate of these social engineering attacks is frightening–some experts, including those from the company KnowBe4, reporting that social engineering accounts for approximately 70-90% of all successful cybersecurity attacks. 

A huge factor behind the success of these attacks is the use of Generative AI (Gen AI). Another is that many businesses still view these social engineering attacks through an email-only lens. For years, phishing and business email compromise (BEC) attacks have been the most prominent form of social engineering, first emerging in 2010 and officially recognized as a distinct threat by the FBI in 2013. 

Then, in 2024, everything shifted. That’s when easy-to-use AI tools and models became widely available. These tools lowered the bar, allowing malicious actors with little to no coding skills to launch sophisticated social engineering attacks targeting an organization’s entire payment processes, workflows, and decision-making chains. 

Here is what finance executives are facing today. 

Deepfake Attacks & Executive Impersonation  

In what seems like the blink of an eye, cybercriminals have embraced advanced techniques like Gen AI to clone voices and develop deepfake videos that create lifelike versions of company executives that can be undetectable to the human eye. A February 2025 report found that 68% of the deepfake content analyzed was nearly indistinguishable from genuine media.  This helps explain why Deloitte predicts fraud losses will soar to $40 billion in the U.S. by 2027, up from the $12.3 billion stolen in 2023.  

Exploitation of Trust  

If you examine real-life social engineering attacks, you may pick up on a common theme—criminals tend to impersonate senior executives. That’s because victims are more likely to trust leadership and, as a result, bypass standard review protocols for what appears to be an urgent or high-priority request. 

Pressure and Urgency  

If impersonating a senior executive isn’t enough, attackers will often tap into a bit of human psychology by adding urgency to their request. This false sense of urgency usually impacts the victim’s ability to think critically while adding a layer of anxiety that makes it far more challenging for them to spot inconsistencies.  

Weak Vendor Verification 

Attackers impersonate trusted entities like vendors, suppliers, or company executives, crafting fraudulent invoices that easily sneak past weak vendor verification systems that depend on human intervention, lack adequate identity verification, often operate using outdated vendor data, and more. These invoices use fake email addresses or spoof legitimate ones to appear authentic. It’s also common for criminals to steal email login credentials, which allows them to send invoices from an actual employee’s account, bypassing traditional authentication methods with ease. 

So, where does this leave businesses and finance teams that are clearly overmatched? To combat these threats, businesses must implement AI-driven fraud prevention solutions that leverage Behavioral AI to analyze transaction patterns, detect anomalies, and stop fraud before it occurs. Some key features can include: 

Strengthening Fraud Prevention with AI-Powered Security 

Comprehensive, AI-Driven Fraud Detection 

Fraud is no longer just an email issue. Cybercriminals exploit weaknesses across email, payments, and vendor interactions. Businesses need security solutions that integrate these data points to detect irregular patterns in real time—monitoring workflows, approvals, and behavioral changes to stop fraud before funds are transferred. 

Proactive Monitoring of High-Risk Roles 

Finance teams, executives, and vendor managers are prime targets. Security teams must continuously track behavioral shifts, unusual transactions, and emerging deepfake threats—such as unexpected login locations, altered typing patterns, or frequent new bank accounts. 

Holistic Verification Beyond Email 

Outdated manual verification isn’t enough. To prevent unauthorized transactions, businesses must validate all payment requests using multi-factor authentication, vendor verification, and AI-based fraud scoring. 

Real-Time Alerts & Adaptive Threat Detection 

Fraud prevention must be proactive, not reactive. AI-powered systems should deliver real-time alerts, risk-based authentication, and adaptive anomaly detection to neutralize threats before they cause damage. By leveraging AI and behavioral analysis, businesses can stay ahead of evolving fraud tactics and safeguard their financial operations. 

Final Thoughts 

AI-powered fraud is not a future threat; it’s happening now, and businesses leaning on traditional security methods are already behind. With deepfake attacks growing in sophistication and scale, closing the gap and getting the upper hand must be the priority for businesses. That means transitioning from reactive security approaches to proactive fraud prevention that stops AI-powered social engineering and protects a business’s most valuable asset: its money. 

Shai Gabay
Shai Gabay

A visionary entrepreneur, Shai Gabay has always held a deep passion for cybersecurity and fintech, and over the course of his career, he has developed his expertise in both areas. Currently, Shai is a co-founder and the CEO of Trustmi, a leading end-to-end payment security platform founded in Israel in 2021. Prior to Trustmi, he was General Manager at Opera, VP of Product and Services at Cynet, CIO at Cyberbit, and the CISO at Discount Bank. Shai holds a Bachelor's Degree from Shenkar College in software engineering and a Master's degree in Business Administration and Management from Tel Aviv University.

    The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

    Related Posts

    From AI hype to operational reality: A practitioner’s framework for securing agentic systems

    June 5, 20267 Mins Read

    Artificial intelligence and elections: When an election is annulled because of TikTok

    June 1, 20268 Mins Read

    NCSC warns organisations not to rush into agentic AI

    May 19, 20265 Mins Read
    ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

    No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

     
    ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
    Black ISB Logo

    Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

    X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

    Working With Us

    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    Write For Us

    • How To Contribute

    The Pages

    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • AI Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Copyright Notice

    Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Manage Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}