Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Attacks - Cyberattack on Swiss Vendor Exposes UBS and Pictet Employee Data
Attacks Data Breach Data Protection Latest News News & Analysis Security Supply Chain Security

Cyberattack on Swiss Vendor Exposes UBS and Pictet Employee Data

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleJune 20, 20254 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Cyberattack on Swiss Vendor
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Swiss banks UBS and Pictet confirmed this week that a third-party cyberattack led to a leak of internal company data, highlighting the growing threat of supply chain vulnerabilities in financial services. 

The breach stemmed from an attack on Chain IQ, a Baar-based procurement services provider. Chain IQ said it was one of 20 organisations targeted in a sophisticated intrusion that leveraged techniques “never before seen on a global scale.” 

UBS moved quickly to reassure stakeholders.  

“A cyber attack at an external supplier has led to information about UBS and several other companies being stolen. No client data has been affected,” the bank said in a statement. “As soon as UBS became aware of the incident, it took swift and decisive action to avoid any impact on its operations.” 

Details of Tens of Thousands of Employees 

Swiss newspaper Le Temps reported that the stolen data includes details of tens of thousands of UBS employees. Among the records leaked was a direct internal line to UBS CEO Sergio Ermotti. 

Pictet, a private bank, said it was also affected. It stressed that no client information was compromised. The stolen data included invoice-related files tied to external suppliers such as IT vendors and consultants. “We take data breaches seriously,” Pictet said, citing internal protocols aimed at preventing unauthorised access. 

Chain IQ confirmed that some customer data was exfiltrated and published on the darknet, an anonymous part of the internet where illicit material is often traded. 

“Immediately after the data was published on Thursday, June 12, 2025, at 5:15 p.m. CET, all relevant systems were checked, secured, and protective measures were strengthened,” the company said. 

Law enforcement was notified and containment was achieved after 8 hours and 45 minutes, according to Chain IQ’s statement. The company said it informed affected customers, partners, and employees on the same day, and continues to work with cybersecurity firms InfoGuard and Kyndryl on remediation. 

No Bank Customer Data Stolen 

Chain IQ emphasised that it does not hold any data related to its customers’ core banking operations. “Accordingly, no bank customer data was stolen in this attack,” it said. However, some employee business contact details (such as internal telephone numbers) were accessed and leaked. 

Swiss financial regulator FINMA acknowledged awareness of the incident and is addressing it according to standard procedures. 

While firms like KPMG, also listed as a Chain IQ client, confirmed their infrastructure had not been affected, the incident has reignited concerns about the long tail of cybersecurity risk in banking. 

Chain IQ stated it would not comment on any ransom demands or negotiations, citing ongoing investigations and security protocols. 

The breach, although limited in scope, is a reminder that even the world’s most secure banks cannot afford to overlook the risk beyond their walls. 

Adopt an ‘Assume Breach’ Mindset 

Piyush Pandey, CEO at Pathlock , says the leakage of personal employee data, including a direct internal line to the CEO, is particularly concerning amid the current wave of sophisticated social engineering attacks. “There are multiple ways criminals could misuse this information, underscoring the need for the company to enhance its cybersecurity resilience. Attacks targeting senior leadership are especially bold, as they aim to gain access to critical systems and business processes to disrupt operations or commit fraud.” 

In a world of escalating cyber threats, Pandey says that organizations should adopt an ‘assume breach’ mindset, investing not only in preventive measures but also in controls that ensure attacks can be quickly detected, contained, and remediated. “This approach helps terminate the malicious activity at an early stage and supports faster recovery.” 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

June 11, 20264 Mins Read

Dutch police, NCSC take down major botnet

June 4, 20264 Mins Read

CrowdStrike, Google, and Shadowserver Foundation disrupt Glassworm botnet

June 1, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}