Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Threats and Vulnerabilities - DNS Vulnerability: ‘Sitting Ducks’ Exposes Millions of Domains to Hijacking
Threats and Vulnerabilities Latest News Network Security News & Analysis Study & Research

DNS Vulnerability: ‘Sitting Ducks’ Exposes Millions of Domains to Hijacking

ISB Staff ReporterBy ISB Staff ReporterAugust 2, 2024Updated:November 8, 20243 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
DNS Vulnerability
DNS Vulnerability
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

A recently discovered vulnerability in the Domain Name System (DNS), dubbed ‘Sitting Ducks,’ has left millions of domains susceptible to hijacking. This attack vector, actively exploited since 2019, enables threat actors to deliver malware, phish, impersonate brands, and exfiltrate data.

Researchers at Infoblox and Eclypsium identified the vulnerability, coordinating with law enforcement and national Computer Emergency Response Teams (CERTs) since June 2024. The issue arises when a registered domain or subdomain uses authoritative DNS services from a provider different from the domain registrar, a process known as name server delegation.

If the authoritative name server lacks information about the domain, it results in a ‘lame delegation.’ Attackers can then claim ownership of the domain at the delegated DNS provider without accessing the legitimate owner’s account at the registrar.

One Million Domains

The researchers estimate around one million domains are exploitable, with over 30,000 confirmed hijacked domains since 2019. The true extent of the issue is believed to be much larger, with ongoing research uncovering expanding risks.

The Sitting Ducks vulnerability is a new entry in a series of DNS-related issues highlighting the difficulty of securing this attack surface. Some key exploitation techniques include:

  • Lame Delegation Attacks: These occur when a malicious actor registers an assigned name server domain, gaining control over all domains pointing to that server.
  • Dangling DNS Records: These attacks exploit invalid DNS records, such as a CNAME record redirecting to a domain whose registration has lapsed. Attackers can register the lapsed domain and mislead users.
  • Domain Shadowing: This involves creating new DNS records within the valid owner’s account, requiring access to the existing account at the registrar or DNS provider.

Not a New Issue

The Sitting Ducks issue is not entirely new. Similar vulnerabilities were discussed in 2016 by Matthew Bryant in “The Orphaned Internet – Taking Over 120K Domains via a DNS Vulnerability,” and later in 2019, when Brian Krebs reported on the exploitation of a similar weakness at GoDaddy. Despite these warnings, the issue persisted and resurfaced with renewed exploitation in 2024.

Recommendations for Mitigation

To safeguard against Sitting Ducks attacks, the researchers recommend domain owners should:

  • Verify if their authoritative DNS provider is independent of their domain registrar.
  • Ensure their domains and subdomains do not have name server delegation to expired or invalid accounts.
  • Inquire with DNS providers about specific mitigations against this attack.

The recommend DNS service providers should:

  • Assign a random name server host requiring registrar changes for domain name claims to verify ownership.
  • Ensure newly assigned name server hosts do not match previous assignments to avoid verification issues.
  • Prevent account holders from modifying name server hosts after assignment to complicate hijacking attempts.

The non-profit Shadowserver Foundation has established a monitoring service to help domain owners detect such vulnerabilities, promising daily reports to signed-up users. As the DNS landscape continues to evolve, addressing these vulnerabilities is crucial for maintaining the integrity and security of online domains.

ISB Staff Reporter
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    Mass Exploit Lets Attackers Install Plugins Arbitrarily
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    Cyberattacks Soar 47% Globally – Attacks on Education Increase by 73%
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    CISA Warns of Two Known Exploited Vulnerabilities
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    JFrog Becomes an AI System of Record, Debuts JFrog ML

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Palo Alto warns of active exploitation of GlobalProtect authentication bypass flaw

June 2, 20263 Mins Read

How EM is boosting the career trajectory of VM analysts

May 19, 20266 Mins Read

Microsoft patches 138 vulnerabilities as AI-driven discovery accelerates

May 14, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}