Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Threats and Vulnerabilities - Email Security Risk Remains Alarmingly High
Threats and Vulnerabilities Attacks BEC Latest News News & Analysis Phishing Study & Research

Email Security Risk Remains Alarmingly High

ISB Staff ReporterBy ISB Staff ReporterAugust 13, 2024Updated:November 8, 20244 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Email Security Risks
Email Security Risks
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

A staggering 94% of companies have fallen victim to phishing attacks over the last year, while 91% experienced data loss or exfiltration incidents. It’s not surprising, then, that 95% of cybersecurity leaders are increasingly stressed about email security, particularly phishing attacks originating from compromised supply chain accounts, internal account takeovers due to credential harvesting, and wire fraud.

These were two findings of the 2024 Email Security Risk Report from Egress, a KnowBe4 company. The report, based on an independent survey of 500 cybersecurity professionals, paints a grim picture of the current state of email security, revealing that traditional approaches to technology and training are struggling to keep pace with the shifting threat landscape.

Consistent and Growing Threats

The growing sophistication of attacks, fueled by the use of artificial intelligence (AI), is also a significant concern. Some 63% of respondents expressed worries about deep fakes, while 61% are alarmed by the potential misuse of generative AI and chatbots to craft more convincing phishing campaigns.

Phishing remains one of the most persistent and damaging threats to organizations. According to the report, 94% of surveyed entities have suffered phishing attacks in the last 12 months, a figure that has remained steady compared to last year’s findings. The top three attack vectors were malicious URLs, phishing emails sent from compromised third-party accounts, and malware or ransomware delivered via email.

The report underscores the continued risk posed by compromised accounts both within businesses and their supply chains. Alarmingly, 58% of respondents reported account takeover (ATO) incidents in the past year, with 79% of these attacks beginning with a phishing email that harvested an employee’s credentials. Even with multi-factor authentication (MFA) in place, 83% of companies with ATO incidents reported that MFA was bypassed, allowing attackers to gain unauthorized access.

These compromised accounts are particularly concerning because they can be used to launch further attacks within an organization or its supply chain. The report found that 51% of organizations had already been targeted by phishing attacks originating from compromised supply chain accounts. This makes it clear why phishing attacks sent from within the supply chain are the top concern for cybersecurity leaders.

The Human Cost of Phishing

The fallout from phishing attacks has become more severe, with 96% reporting negative impacts, a 10% increase from last year’s report. The human cost is significant, with nearly three-quarters (74%) of those surveyed taking disciplinary action against employees involved in phishing incidents. In fact, disciplinary measures were the most common outcome, occurring in 51% of organizations.

The financial and reputational toll of phishing is also growing. The report found that 79% experienced some form of business impact due to phishing, and 64% reported financial losses. The most common financial consequence was revenue loss from customer churn, which affected 47% of respondents. Reputational damage also remained a significant concern, impacting 42%.

Outbound Data Loss: An Ongoing Challenge

While inbound threats like phishing garner much attention, the report also highlights the persistent challenge of outbound data loss. In the last 12 months, 91% of entities reported security incidents related to outbound email data loss within their Microsoft 365 environments. These incidents were primarily due to employees breaking rules or making mistakes in their daily tasks. The top three causes were employees exfiltrating data for work purposes, accidentally sending emails and files to incorrect recipients, and exfiltrating data for personal gain.

As with phishing incidents, the consequences of outbound data loss are becoming more severe. The report found that 94% of respondents were negatively impacted by outbound security incidents, an 8% increase from last year. Disciplinary actions against employees were the most common response, with 67% of organizations taking such measures. The financial impact was also significant, with 57% of organizations experiencing losses, often due to customer churn.

A Need for Change

The report makes it clear that traditional approaches to email security are no longer sufficient. A significant 91% of respondents using secure email gateways (SEGs) expressed frustration with these tools, and 88% voiced concerns with Microsoft’s native controls. On the outbound side, 83% found static data loss prevention (DLP) rules unworkable for employees and administrators. Additionally, 91% of cybersecurity leaders questioned the effectiveness of their current security awareness training programs.

However, the report also suggests that change is on the horizon. Many organizations (87%) are considering or are already committed to replacing their SEGs with Microsoft’s controls and integrated cloud email security (ICES) solutions. This shift indicates a broader recognition that more sophisticated and integrated approaches to email security are needed to fight today’s email threats.

To learn more about these findings and explore the full range of data and insights, download the full report here.

ISB Staff Reporter
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    Mass Exploit Lets Attackers Install Plugins Arbitrarily
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    Cyberattacks Soar 47% Globally – Attacks on Education Increase by 73%
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    CISA Warns of Two Known Exploited Vulnerabilities
  • ISB Staff Reporter
    JFrog Becomes an AI System of Record, Debuts JFrog ML

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Palo Alto warns of active exploitation of GlobalProtect authentication bypass flaw

June 2, 20263 Mins Read

How EM is boosting the career trajectory of VM analysts

May 19, 20266 Mins Read

Microsoft patches 138 vulnerabilities as AI-driven discovery accelerates

May 14, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}