There was a time when the standard for privileged access management (PAM) programs was simple: record everything. The idea was that by capturing all privileged sessions, teams would have a record of all activity, the good, the bad, and the ugly, along with assurances that it would help businesses in regulated industries satisfy all audit requirements.
But sessions today bear little resemblance to those of just a few years ago. Most notably, businesses today operate in cloud-native environments, where privileged access is no longer limited to just humans. It’s been extended to non-human identities (NHIs) and AI agents, and access needs change rapidly.
Blanket Recordings Are No Longer Effective
On this new playing field, blanket recording sessions are no longer an effective mechanism for control. First off, while recording everything may sound like it covers all bases, it does not prevent compromises or misuse. What teams get is a post-mortem of what occurred, along with insights that may (or may not) help fill gaps in an incident investigation. What’s lacking are insights or controls to help prevent them in the first place.
Next come storage and governance burdens. With a “record everything” approach, businesses are gathering thousands of hours of data, the vast majority of which will never be reviewed. This creates two issues. First, storing this data is costly, and as the library of data grows, so too do the costs. Second, it can expose businesses to privacy and compliance violations if no retention and monitoring rules are in place.
Another limitation is speed. Cloud APIs, automation pipelines, and agentic AI systems are operating at speeds faster than ever. Recording what human admins do on a console is one thing. But trying to capture the actions of autonomous processes or integrated services across multiple environments is simply not realistic.
It’s Time to Get Dynamic
What businesses need is dynamic access control, where always-on admin roles and pre-granted permissions are replaced with just-in-time (JIT) authorization. With this modern access model, access is no longer handed out carte blanche along with long-standing privileges. It is given only when needed and scoped precisely to the requested task or resource.
But that’s not all. By pairing JIT with runtime authorization, businesses can align access decisions with risk and context in real time. And by including auto-expiration, businesses remove dormant credentials, eliminate the need for regular, time-consuming audits of long-lived permissions, and ultimately shrink the attack surface.
The Case for Unified Access Control
As touched on earlier, businesses are operating in cloud-first environments, where privileged access extends far beyond employees. Now workloads, CI/CD pipelines, bots, and AI agents all need access to sensitive systems and data, which creates the need for a consistent access strategy that leverages a unified policy framework to ensure the same controls and oversight are applied across all identity types throughout the entire environment.
A unified policy framework—one that defines, enforces, and audits access consistently for all identities—eliminates blind spots and makes it easier to implement and maintain Zero Standing Privilege across environments. Regardless of how access is requested (e.g., browser, CLI, API, or automated system), the rules are the same.
In addition, dynamically managed access enhances observability by providing actionable details that are not possible when replaying raw screen captures after the fact. For example, identity-level audits allow teams to determine who requested access, what was retrieved, when it was retrieved, for how long, and under what conditions.
When Recording Still Has a Role
While there are benefits to these new approaches, it’s important to note that session recording can still play a role when used surgically rather than universally. Examples of these scenarios include:
Industries with Strict Audit Trail Requirements.
Industries such as healthcare and life sciences, banking and financial services, still require strict audit logs. Whether it’s capturing proof of production, maintenance, or critical system changes, recording plays a key role.
Companies Working with Multiple Third-Party Vendors.
Businesses today rely on a large number of third-party vendors, who are given access to sensitive systems or data. A recording can provide evidence when a third party accesses information beyond their defined scope.
Organization Heavily Reliant on Legacy Infrastructure.
Legacy environments may not provide the audit capabilities businesses require today. In these instances, recording can help to fill the void.
In these cases, recording is valuable, but it should not be used to monitor all privileged actions. Work with teams to develop guidelines specifying which roles, session types, or systems should be recorded, and put in place oversight to ensure they are followed closely. In doing so, a company can avoid unnecessary data collection, reduce exposure to potential privacy issues, and ensure that what is recorded is useful.
Putting Prevention First
It’s time for businesses to recognize that recording alone cannot prevent unauthorized access or stop an insider from exfiltrating data or an attacker from escalating privileges. It serves as a valuable source of evidence that can be valuable after the fact. As we look toward 2026, security teams will begin to see that the next phase in identity and access security employs a preventative approach that uses real-time policy-based decision-making and narrowly and temporarily scoped access, preventing misuse from ever occurring.
Art Poghosyan is an entrepreneur and InfoSec expert with over 20 years in cybersecurity. He excels in building high-performance teams and fostering collaborative, accountable cultures. Prior to founding Britive, a pioneering cloud privileged access management (CPAM) platform, he co-founded Advancive, an Identity and Access Management (IAM) consulting firm acquired by Optiv in 2016. Art is a mentor, speaker, and contributor to industry events and (ISC)2 CISSP-ISSAP exam development, deeply committed to advancing cloud security innovations.
The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.