Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - News & Analysis - Executive Order Limiting Usage Of Commercial Spyware Signed
News & Analysis Attacks

Executive Order Limiting Usage Of Commercial Spyware Signed

Olivia WilliamBy Olivia WilliamMarch 28, 2023Updated:May 2, 20255 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Executive Order Limiting Usage Of Commercial Spyware Signed
Executive Order Limiting Usage Of Commercial Spyware Signed
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

On Monday, President Joe Biden of the United States issued an executive order restricting federal agencies’ use of commercial spyware. According to the order, the spyware ecosystem “poses serious security or counterintelligence threats to the United States Government or significant risks of inappropriate use by a foreign government or foreign person.”

Biden signs executive order restricting use of commercial spywarehttps://t.co/SDdwWtFA1m

— KickdragonNews (@kickdragonvids) March 28, 2023

In the document, the utilization of these tools by the government must also be compatible with paying cognizance of the rule of law and democratic norms and principles. To that purpose, the directive outlines the numerous standards that can prevent commercial spyware from being used by U.S. government agencies. They consist of the following:

  • A foreign government or individual purchasing commercial malware with the intent to target the United States government.
  • A commercial spyware provider acts as an agent for a foreign government engaged in anti-American espionage activities and uses or publishes sensitive information gathered from the cyber surveillance instrument without authorization.
  • A foreign threat actor who targets activists and dissidents with commercial spyware in an effort to curtail their freedom of expression or violate their human rights,
  • A foreign threat actor who monitors a person in the United States using commercial spyware without their consent, protection, or supervision, and
  • The distribution of commercial spyware to nations with a history of systematic political repression and other human rights abuses.

The White House said, “This Executive Order will also lay the groundwork for strengthening international cooperation to encourage responsible use of surveillance technology, fight the spread and abuse of such technology, and spur industry change.”

The Wall Street Journal stated that the number of senior U.S. government personnel infected or targeted by this spyware to date is greater than previously thought, with an estimated 50 spread across at least ten different nations.

Executive Order Bans Federal Agencies From Commercial Spyware

This change comes as sophisticated and intrusive surveillance techniques are increasingly used to remotely access electronic devices utilizing zero-click attacks and gather vital information about targets without their knowledge or agreement. The decision, however, stops short of an absolute ban.

The New York Times revealed last week that Greece’s national intelligence service used Predator, a spyware created by Cytrox, to wiretap and hack Artemis Seaford’s phone. Seaford was a former security policy manager at Meta.

But, the order also left open the prospect that other malware tools, such as IMSI catchers, could be employed by government organizations to gather important information.

In that context, it’s also a recognition that the spyware-for-sale market contributes significantly to intelligence collection efforts despite the fact that the technology poses a rising threat to counterintelligence and national security for government employees.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) acknowledged earlier this month that the organization had occasionally bought the location information of American residents from data brokers in order to circumvent the standard warrant procedure. Additionally, it is claimed that the FBI purchased a license for Pegasus from the Israeli company NSO Group in 2020 and 2021, admitting that it was used for R&D.

Similarly to this, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) uses Graphite, a spyware tool created by Paragon, an Israeli business, for counterdrug operations. Whether additional U.S. federal agencies now use any commercial spyware is unclear.

Conclusion

US President Joe Biden has signed an executive order that restricts the government’s use of commercial spyware software to spy on political dissidents around the globe. The Biden administration placed penalties on the Israeli spyware maker NSO Group, which has been at the forefront of international discussions about spyware abuse, more than a year prior to the action taken on Monday. Its Pegasus software has watched numerous political figures, journalists, and proponents of human rights. A statement from the White House, authoritarian regimes are not the only ones that have abused these potent monitoring capabilities.

The use of commercial spyware to target citizens without the proper legal authorization, safeguards, or oversight has been revealed to have occurred within democratic governments as well. The announcement of the order comes as the US gets ready to host a “summit for democracy” later this week. There are exceptions that allow government organizations to use spyware programs if the agency head decides the program does not present a risk to counterintelligence or national security.

Additionally, since both the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency have a history of unethical surveillance practices, the decision does not apply to spyware developed by these governmental organizations. Human rights organizations have cautioned that the increased accessibility of surveillance tools due to commercial spyware is concerning. It has been claimed that nations like Mexico, El Salvador, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates use the software to target journalists and human rights organizations. Additionally, the White House stated on Monday without going into further detail that US government employees abroad “have been targeted by commercial spyware.”

Olivia William
  • Olivia William
    Ciso Playbook: Cyber Resilience Strategy
  • Olivia William
    Apple Responds Swiftly to Active Security Threats with iOS 16.5.1 Update
  • Olivia William
    Zacks Investment Research Faces Larger Data Breach Affecting 8.8 Million Users
  • Olivia William
    British Airways and Boots Battling Data Breaches, Millions of Customers Affected

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Exploited Faster, Patched Slower: Verizon DBIR 2026 Shows Security Teams Losing Ground

May 20, 20265 Mins Read

Security’s Blind Spot: The Threats Hiding in “Low-Severity” Alerts

May 6, 20265 Mins Read

Why OSINT deserves the same status as other intelligence disciplines

March 17, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}