Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - News & Analysis - Expert Advice on Attackers bypassing Microsoft RDP
News & Analysis

Expert Advice on Attackers bypassing Microsoft RDP

ISB Editorial StaffBy ISB Editorial StaffJune 5, 20194 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
microsoft_patch
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

On June 4, 2019, the CERT Coordination Centre (CERT/CC) Carnegie Mellon’s Computer Emergency Response Team released an advisory regarding discovered behaviour in the Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), which can allow an attacker to bypass the lock screen on some remote sessions.

Microsoft was notified of this finding and has stated that the “behaviour does not meet the Microsoft Security Servicing Criteria for Windows,” meaning there will be no patch available at least for the time being.

It is understandable that many organisations still scrambling to ensure their systems are not vulnerable to the recent (“BlueKeep”RDP wormable vulnerability) would not be thrilled that there is yet another RDP issue they need to deal with.

NSA is raising their own concern that the Microsoft RDP flaw (#BlueKeep) is of significant risk to unpatched systems. Patch and protect! https://t.co/hj1c40psma

— Rob Joyce (@RGB_Lights) June 4, 2019

Expert Comments:

Tom Sellers, Manager, Rapid7 Labs:

“According to Microsoft, the issue described in this CVE is how Network Level Authentication is supposed to work in modern versions of Windows running and accessing RDP sessions. In other words, this is a weakness but not something that requires mitigation viapatching.”

What can organisations do?

“For starters, businesses can develop a communication plan that ensures all users of RDP know to **lock their own workstations** when they are not in front of them and especially if they have an active RDP session established. Said communication plan should also include guidance to disconnect from RDP sessions instead of just locking the remote screen if a user needs to step away from a session for any significant length of time.

“It may also be possible to detect instances of mass RDP screen unlocks by performing regular internal RDP scans (including on-connect screenshot) to ensure all systems are, indeed, locked.”

Is this world ending?

“Yes, in about a few billion years, but definitely not because of this new RDP CVE. The CVSS base, temporal, and environmental scores for CVE-2019-9510 are all within the 4–5 range (out of 10). A big reason for that is the limited scope and “perfect storm” required to take advantage of the RDP NLA weakness. While this affects all modern versions of Microsoft Windows (Windows 10 1803, Server 2019 and later) Remember, this only impacts specific versions of Windows (Windows 10 1803 and Windows Server 2019), and, attackers need to be in a position to either watch for these events to take place on their own (as networks are not perfect) or initiate potentially noisy network actions to facilitate the disconnect and take advantage of a (hopefully) brief window of opportunity.

“It is important to note that this is a potential vector for finely tuned targeted attacks. It’s also likely to be used by penetration testers or red teams, especially if the weakness stays in NLA-protected RDP in future Windows versions.

“For now, Rapid7 Labs suggests that organisations focus on ensuring you’re safe from “BlueKeep” before addressing this new attack vector and focus on communication and detection vs. falling prey to any media- or industry-driven hype. If you have the inclination, you could set up an Active Directory GPO to automatically kill disconnected RDP sessions, as described here, but again, this is not a “drop what you’re doing and solve this now” kind of problem — this is more along the lines of doing something to get your IT management off your back while you get back to work on continuous scanning and patch management and other important tasks.”

Rapid7 Managed Detection and Response team members and internal security researchers are investigating whether it might be possible to detect abnormal activity around this potential attack vector by monitoring the following Windows Events:

Event ID: 24

Provider Name: Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-LocalSessionManager

Description: “Remote Desktop Services: Session has been disconnected:”

Event ID: 25

Provider Name: Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-LocalSessionManager

Description: “Remote Desktop Services: Session reconnection succeeded:”

Event ID: 40

Provider Name: Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-LocalSessionManager

Description: “Session <X> has been disconnected, reason code <Z>”

in: `%SystemRoot%\System32\Winevt\Logs\Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-LocalSessionManager%4Operational.evtx`

or:

Event ID: 4778

Provider Name: Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing

Description: “A session was reconnected to a Window Station.”

Event ID: 4779

Provider Name: Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing

Description: “A session was disconnected from a Window Station.”

in: `%SystemRoot%\System32\Winevt\Logs\Security.evtx`.

ISB Editorial Staff
  • ISB Editorial Staff
    Navigating the Cyber Threat Landscape: Key Insights from Trellix ARC’s Q1 2023 Report
  • ISB Editorial Staff
    Experts’ Responses: Cyber Security Predictions 2022
  • ISB Editorial Staff
    ISB Virtual Conference: Key Cyber Security Challenges and Solutions in 2021
  • ISB Editorial Staff
    Cyber Security Predictions 2021: Experts’ Responses

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Exploited Faster, Patched Slower: Verizon DBIR 2026 Shows Security Teams Losing Ground

May 20, 20265 Mins Read

Security’s Blind Spot: The Threats Hiding in “Low-Severity” Alerts

May 6, 20265 Mins Read

Why OSINT deserves the same status as other intelligence disciplines

March 17, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}