Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - King Me: Ruling The DDoS landscape
Articles

King Me: Ruling The DDoS landscape

Moshe EliasBy Moshe EliasNovember 27, 2017Updated:August 5, 20243 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

This past October marked the one-year anniversary of the Mirai botnet-driven distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack against Dyn. From one year ago to the more recent disruption of the Swedish train system, it’s clear that this is the new reality for IT professionals worldwide.

technology trends such as the Internet of Things (IoT), where the focus has been more on functionality than security. Enterprises rebuilding their reputation from the ashes of a takedown have learned the hard way that it pays to be proactive, not reactive, when it comes to hackers and threats.

But have you considered what would happen if it was your hijacked network which launched the attack? It’s something that can be avoided by following the basic principles of beating your opponent at checkers and applying it to the security world.

Your opponent is an attacker and the goal of the game is to win— but how? Enterprises can become expert strategists by adhering to the following steps if they want to be king:

  1. Understand the rules of the game: The DDoS devil is in the detail

In checkers, the player who has more kings has the upper hand in the game. This is often achieved by anticipating your opponent’s next move. In the security world, enterprises can practice this mentality by knowing what security gaps exist before they become problems. Granular network visibility—inspecting every packet— is the only way to spot an anomaly and determine what is connected to your network, what applications are running on the network, and what resources they are consuming and when.

  1. Keep your back row in place: The first line of defense to protect firewalls and routers

To reduce the amount of crowns your opponent receives in checkers, it’s best to keep your back row in place until an opportune move presents itself and it’s safe to do so. For service providers looking to beef up their security efforts and prevent the next attack, a solid security solution checklist is invaluable. Without a multilayer approach to combine proactive measures such as policy-based traffic management with threat intelligence, enterprises are increasing their vulnerability risk and likelihood of attack.

  1. See everything on the board: Check blind spots in the network

One of the most important strategies behind winning checkers is keeping an eye on all pieces in play and what parts of the board aren’t being used. For example, strategically controlling the board and knowing its empty spaces can prevent your opponent from crowning their pieces. Just like checkers, service providers should be on the lookout for all aspects of their cloud infrastructure and network virtualization— especially the blind spots. When it comes to network infrastructure, service continuity and business reputation, DDoS attacks have had the most success damaging all aforementioned departments.

If enterprises want to come up on top from recent attacks and avoid being the next Swedish transport agency target, they should consider tapping into their checker-playing abilities for DDoS defense, as well.

[su_box title=”About Moshe Elias” style=”noise” box_color=”#336588″][short_info id=’101383′ desc=”true” all=”false”][/su_box]

Moshe Elias

Cyber Expert

    The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

    Related Posts

    Exploited Faster, Patched Slower: Verizon DBIR 2026 Shows Security Teams Losing Ground

    May 20, 20265 Mins Read

    Security’s Blind Spot: The Threats Hiding in “Low-Severity” Alerts

    May 6, 20265 Mins Read

    Why OSINT deserves the same status as other intelligence disciplines

    March 17, 20266 Mins Read
    ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

     
    ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
    Black ISB Logo

    Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

    X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

    Working With Us

    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    Write For Us

    • How To Contribute

    The Pages

    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • AI Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Copyright Notice

    Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Manage Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}