Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - RCE - Max Severity Commvault Command Center Flaw Allows Attackers to Execute Code Remotely
RCE Attacks Emerging Threats Latest News News & Analysis Threat Intelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities

Max Severity Commvault Command Center Flaw Allows Attackers to Execute Code Remotely

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleApril 25, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Commvault Command Center Flaw
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

A critical security vulnerability has been discovered in the Commvault Command Center, that could enable malicious actors to remotely to execute arbitrary code without authentication,” Commvault said in an advisory.  

“This vulnerability could lead to a complete compromise of the Command Center environment. Fortunately, other installations within the same system are not affected by this vulnerability,” the advisory added.  

The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-34028, carries a CVSS score of 10.0 – the highest possible. 

A researcher from watchTowr Labs, Sonny Macdonald, is credited with discovering and reporting the flaw on 7 April. He said it could be exploited to achieve pre-authenticated remote code execution.  

Specifically, the issue is rooted in an endpoint called deployWebpackage.do, which triggers a pre-authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) because there is no filtering as to what hosts can be communicated with.  

The flaw could then be escalated to achieve code execution by leveraging a ZIP archive file that contains a malicious .JSP file.  

The sequence of events is as follows:  

  • Send an HTTP request to /commandcenter/deployWebpackage.do, causing the Commvault instance to retrieve a ZIP file from an external server  
  • Contents of the ZIP file get unzipped into a .tmp directory under the attacker’s control  
  • Use the servicePack parameter to traverse the .tmp directory into a pre-authenticated facing directory on the server, such as ../../Reports/MetricsUpload/shell  
  • Execute the SSRF via /commandcenter/deployWebpackage.do  
  • Execute the shell from /reports/MetricsUpload/shell/.tmp/dist-cc/dist-cc/shell.jsp  

Macdonald explained the process in a report published today, and released a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit that can be used to check whether a Commvault Command Center instance is vulnerable.  

Commvault said the vulnerability impacts only the 11.38 Innovation Release and has been resolved in the following Innovation Update releases. No other versions were affected. 

  • 11.38.20, which includes the fix as of 10 April 2025 
  • 11.38.25, which includes the fix as of 10 April 2025 

Innovation releases are managed automatically according to predefined schedules, so no manual intervention is needed, Commvault added. “If installing the update is not feasible, then isolate the Command Center installation from external network access.” 

Technically Serious, Operationally Significant 

Heath Renfrow, CISO and Co-founder at Fenix24 says the vulnerability is both technically serious and operationally significant for businesses that rely on Commvault for backup and recovery. He says there are three reasons for this. Firstly, the flaw can be triggered before any authentication is required, meaning a bad actor doesn’t need valid credentials to initiate the exploit—removing one of the primary barriers to entry. 

Also, the chained attack method, from Server-Side Request Forgery to ZIP-based file deployment, enables full remote code execution. “This effectively hands over server control to an external attacker, potentially allowing them to access or manipulate sensitive backup data or pivot deeper into the environment.” 

A Potential Multi-Vector Crisis  

Finally, Renfrow says Commvault is often deployed in environments that manage critical infrastructure and disaster recovery. “A compromise here could impact not just data integrity but also a company’s ability to recover from ransomware or system failure, turning a single flaw into a multi-vector crisis.” 

Renfrow says several actions should be taken immediately. Apply the patches issued by Commvault as soon as possible and temporarily restrict internet access to the Command Center interface via firewall rules or access controls until the patch has been applied and verified. Also, look for abnormal outbound requests to unknown ZIP sources, file writes in temp directories, or unauthorized access to the /reports/MetricsUpload path. Finally, ensure application isolation, segmentation of management interfaces, and logging of all Command Center interactions.

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

ToolShell Used to Compromise Telecoms, Hit Governments

October 23, 20254 Mins Read

SAP NetWeaver: CVE-2025-31324 Now Exploitable at Scale

August 19, 20254 Mins Read

ToolShell Gets a Patch: Microsoft Rushes Out Fixes as Exploits Surge

July 22, 20254 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}