Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Phishing - Hackers Exploit Microsoft Entra Guest Invitations for Sophisticated TOAD Attacks
Phishing Attacks News & Analysis

Hackers Exploit Microsoft Entra Guest Invitations for Sophisticated TOAD Attacks

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleNovember 19, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Microsoft Entra TOAD Attacks
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

A new wave of phishing attacks is exploiting Microsoft Entra’s guest user invitation system, turning a legitimate collaboration tool into a weapon for social engineering and credential theft, Cyber Security News reports. 

Dubbed a TOAD (Telephone Oriented Attack Delivery) campaign, the attacks combine cloud-based account management with traditional phone scams, demonstrating a dangerous evolution in hybrid cybercrime tactics. 

Security researcher Michael Taggart uncovered the campaign after spotting multiple phishing operations abusing Entra’s guest invitation process. He said malefactors are weaponizing a trusted Microsoft service to bypass email security filters, combining cloud infrastructure abuse with classic phone scams, which makes detection extremely difficult. 

The campaign relies on Microsoft’s own infrastructure. Invitations originate from the legitimate invites@microsoft[.]com address, establishing immediate trust with recipients. Attackers register fake tenant domains with names such as Unified Workspace Team, CloudSync, and Advanced Suite Services, mimicking legitimate Microsoft entities. 

Once a target receives the invitation, they are presented with a convincing message claiming their Microsoft 365 annual plan requires processing. The email includes fabricated billing details, reference numbers, and customer IDs (typically for amounts around $446.46) and instructs the recipient to call a listed support number. In reality, the line connects directly to attackers, who then harvest credentials and attempt account takeovers. 

The campaign’s sophistication lies in its exploitation of a core Entra feature: the guest invitation Message field accepts long-form text, enabling threat actors to embed extensive phishing content without triggering traditional security alerts. When coupled with Microsoft’s own email infrastructure, these messages often slip past spam and phishing filters undetected. 

Taggart identified several malicious tenant domains involved in the campaign, including x44xfqf.onmicrosoft[.]com, woodedlif.onmicrosoft[.]com, and xeyi1ba.onmicrosoft[.]com, providing the attackers with a persistent network to sustain operations. 

Organizations are urged to act quickly. Recommended mitigation steps include: 

  • Searching email logs for the invites@microsoft[.]com sender address. 
  • Looking for subject lines containing phrases like “invited you to access applications within their organization.” 
  • Checking for known attacker tenant names. 
  • Blocking associated phone numbers. 
  • Educating users to verify Microsoft communications via official support channels rather than responding to invitation-based requests. 

Javvad Malik, Lead CISO Advisor at KnowBe4, says:  “By using genuine Microsoft Entra guest invitations, the attackers don’t need a fake email, they inherit Microsoft’s branding, language and workflows. From a human point of view, that’s powerful. The exploitation of Entra is part of a broader trend of using legitimate services to bypass traditional email security detections. Something that has been observed with Appsheet, Quickbooks, and Google.” 

Malik says most people have been told to “check the sender” and “look for the padlock”, but not many have been taught that a perfectly legitimate notification can still be the start of a social engineering call.  “The takeaway isn’t to panic about Entra, but to look at how to minimise the risk. This can be done by utilising Integrated Cloud Email Security products that leverage AI to detect advanced phishing threats and prevent employees from interacting with malicious hyperlinks and attachments.” 
   
Awareness and training for employees is also important and for people to treat “call us” instructions with the same suspicion as “click here”, Malik adds. “It’s also important to give staff a single, well‑known way of contacting their IT or security department. If we design our processes so that verifying a request is easier than just going along with it, these attacks become much harder to land.”  

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

New Phishing Kit Starkiller Defeats Multi-Factor Authentication

February 23, 20264 Mins Read

ReliaQuest Uncovers Social Media Phishing Campaign Built on Trusted Tools

January 22, 20266 Mins Read

What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?

January 5, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}