Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Threats and Vulnerabilities - Microsoft Vulnerability Poses Risk to Domain Control
Threats and Vulnerabilities Latest News News & Analysis Security Threat Intelligence

Microsoft Vulnerability Poses Risk to Domain Control

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleNovember 19, 20242 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Domain Control
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

A recently disclosed flaw in Microsoft Active Directory Certificate Services (ADCS), identified as CVE-2024-49019, could allow attackers to escalate privileges and gain control of a domain.

The vulnerability, rated with a CVSS score of 7.8, is classified as an elevation-of-privilege (EoP) issue. If exploited, attackers could potentially obtain domain administrator privileges, compromising the security of the entire network.

Microsoft’s advisory shares several ways entities can mitigate the risks, including removing excessive enrollment rights for users or groups, eliminating unused certificate templates, and securing templates that allow users to specify a subject in the request.

While no active attacks have been reported, the vulnerability’s low complexity and high likelihood of exploitation make it a critical issue for businesses to address immediately.

Jason Soroko, Senior Fellow at Sectigo, emphasized the importance of carefully managing ADCS permissions to prevent unauthorized access. “Giving too many users enroll or auto-enroll permissions in ADCS makes it tough to track who gets certificates and why. This lack of oversight can lead to unauthorized access all the way up to an attacker gaining domain administration control,” Soroko added.

“Keeping unused certificate templates on certification authorities can worsen the problem. Unused templates might be misused or wrongly issued, complicating certificate tracking even more.”

To enhance security, Soroko recommended using modern Certificate Lifecycle Management (CLM) tools. “CLM solutions boost visibility by tracking certificate issuance, renewal, and revocation. By carefully setting enrollment permissions, removing unnecessary templates, and leveraging CLM tools, organizations can create a secure and transparent certificate environment. This not only reduces the risk of unauthorized certificate issuance but also streamlines certificate management according to best security practices.”

For more information on CVE-2024-49019 and recommended mitigation steps, visit Microsoft’s advisory here.

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    Dutch police, NCSC take down major botnet
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Palo Alto warns of active exploitation of GlobalProtect authentication bypass flaw
  • Kirsten Doyle
    CrowdStrike, Google, and Shadowserver Foundation disrupt Glassworm botnet
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Threat Actors Deploy Tiflux RMM for Persistent Remote Access

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Palo Alto warns of active exploitation of GlobalProtect authentication bypass flaw

June 2, 20263 Mins Read

How EM is boosting the career trajectory of VM analysts

May 19, 20266 Mins Read

Microsoft patches 138 vulnerabilities as AI-driven discovery accelerates

May 14, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}