Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Critical Infrastructure Security - New Russian-Linked Hacker Group ‘Void Blizzard’ Targets Western Critical Infrastructure 
Critical Infrastructure Security Attacks Latest News News & Analysis Security

New Russian-Linked Hacker Group ‘Void Blizzard’ Targets Western Critical Infrastructure 

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleMay 29, 20255 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Russian-Linked Hacker Group Void Blizzard
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

A newly identified threat actor, Void Blizzard, is emerging as a major player in Russian-linked cyberespionage, according to a detailed report by Microsoft Threat Intelligence.  

Active since at least April 2024, Void Blizzard is now on the radar of global security agencies for its highly targeted campaigns against government, defense, healthcare, and media organizations, primarily in NATO member states and Ukraine. 

Backed by evidence and collaboration from the Netherlands’ General and Defence Intelligence and Security Services (AIVD and MIVD), as well as the FBI, the report describes Void Blizzard (also known as LAUNDRY BEAR) as a determined and opportunistic actor, capable of causing widespread disruption despite relying on relatively unsophisticated techniques. 

Who is Void Blizzard? 

Void Blizzard is assessed with high confidence to be affiliated with Russia. Its operations have a clear geopolitical alignment, targeting entities whose intelligence would support Russian strategic objectives. That includes law enforcement and military agencies in countries providing military or humanitarian aid to Ukraine. 

While it shares similarities with other Kremlin-linked groups (such as Forest Blizzard, Midnight Blizzard, and Secret Blizzard) Void Blizzard’s recent tactics show an escalation in scope and ambition. 

Microsoft’s latest findings suggest that Void Blizzard’s efforts are no longer limited to using stolen credentials from underground markets. In April 2025, the group pivoted to direct spear phishing campaigns, masquerading as legitimate communications to steal passwords and multifactor authentication (MFA) tokens. 

A Closer Look at the Tactics 

Void Blizzard’s typical playbook begins with either password spraying or credential stuffing, often leveraging infostealer-derived credentials bought from cybercrime marketplaces. Once they’ve breached an organization, their focus shifts to large-scale exfiltration of emails, files, and even Microsoft Teams conversations via cloud APIs such as Microsoft Graph and Exchange Online. 

In one recent campaign, the group spoofed the Microsoft Entra login page using a typosquatted domain (micsrosoftonline[.]com) to steal credentials. The phishing emails were disguised as invites to a fake “European Defense and Security Summit” and included PDFs containing malicious QR codes. Microsoft has attributed this activity to Void Blizzard’s use of Evilginx, an open-source adversary-in-the-middle (AitM) framework that intercepts login credentials and session cookies. 

Even with basic techniques, the actor has had repeated success. In October 2024, Void Blizzard compromised accounts at a Ukrainian aviation organization, an entity previously targeted by GRU-linked Seashell Blizzard and Forest Blizzard, demonstrating Russia’s long-term interest in the aviation sector. 

Why It Matters 

Void Blizzard’s persistent targeting of critical infrastructure is a wake-up call. Their campaigns, although technically rudimentary, are succeeding because many organizations still rely on outdated identity and access management controls. Once inside, they move fast, abusing legitimate cloud services to blend in and avoid detection while extracting valuable intelligence. 

These operations aren’t just about surveillance. The theft of sensitive information from defense contractors, health providers, and telecommunications networks could be used to disrupt systems, exploit geopolitical tensions, or influence democratic processes. 

Practical Steps for At-Risk Organizations 

Microsoft’s report doesn’t just outline the threat; it offers concrete guidance for organizations, especially those in high-risk sectors like government, defense, and healthcare. 

Identity Hardening 

  • Apply sign-in risk policies via Conditional Access to block suspicious login attempts or require MFA. 
  • Enforce phishing-resistant MFA options like FIDO2 tokens or Microsoft Authenticator with passkeys. Avoid SMS-based MFA, which remains vulnerable to SIM-jacking. 
  • Centralize identity platforms to ensure comprehensive monitoring, ideally through Microsoft Entra ID with SIEM integration. 
  • Enforce the principle of least privilege and audit privileged account activity regularly. 

Email and Post-Compromise Protections 

  • Enable mailbox auditing by default and routinely check non-owner mailbox access reports. 
  • Rotate credentials immediately if a device is suspected to have been infected with an infostealer. 
  • Monitor cloud API activity using tools like Microsoft Graph audit logs and Defender for Cloud Apps anomaly detection. 

Detection Signals to Watch 

Organizations using Microsoft Defender XDR can watch for specific alerts related to Void Blizzard’s activity: 

  • Microsoft Defender for Endpoint: Look for alerts on information-stealing malware or password spraying. 
  • Microsoft Defender for Identity: Key signals include impossible travel, unfamiliar sign-ins, and suspicious behavior. 
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps: Alerts for activity from suspicious IPs or unusual user behavior can indicate compromise. 

Security teams should also leverage Microsoft Security Copilot to accelerate threat hunting, triage alerts, and coordinate incident response based on the latest intelligence. 

Visibility Across Systems 

James McQuiggan, Security Awareness Advocate at KnowBe4, says: “While nation-state sophisticated attacks are persistent, utilise discipline, and target gaps in basic security hygiene, we, as defenders, need visibility across their systems, especially email, remote access, and collaboration tools. 

Credential theft remains a top method of compromise, and without a strong non-phishable MFA and the least privileged access, attackers move freely once they gain access, he adds. “Security teams must implement Zero-Trust concepts, assume compromise will happen, and focus on limiting movement, not just stopping entry when an attacker gets inside the network. Attackers don’t need new tools when the old ones still work.” 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The evolution of cyber risk: Addressing geopolitical threats

May 13, 20265 Mins Read

“Recovery Is the New Prevention”: a Q&A with CSO of Health-ISAC, Errol Weiss

May 7, 20266 Mins Read

Pro-Russian threat actors target Swedish heat and power plant in failed cyberattack

April 20, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}