Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Attacks - New ZipLine Campaign Exploits Contact Forms to Target US Supply Chains
Attacks News & Analysis Phishing Security Supply Chain Security

New ZipLine Campaign Exploits Contact Forms to Target US Supply Chains

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleAugust 27, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
ZipLine Campaign
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Bad actors are patient. They know trust takes time. With ZipLine, they have turned patience into a weapon. 

Check Point Research has uncovered a campaign aimed at U.S. manufacturers and supply-chain critical industries.  

The trick is simple, yet unusual. The attacker does not send the first email. Instead, they use the target’s own “Contact Us” form. The company responds, thinking it’s business as usual. That single reply begins a conversation that may last for weeks. 

The dialogue is businesslike. Meetings are discussed. Non-disclosure agreements are drafted. The threat actor sounds like a partner, not a criminal. Then comes the ZIP file. Inside: a malicious chain that leads to a custom backdoor called MixShell. 

The Long Con 

Most phishing campaigns begin with a blast. One message, one link, one click. ZipLine is different. It is slower. Quieter. Each exchange builds credibility. By the time the malicious file arrives, suspicion is gone. 

The attackers use domains that look real. Some match the names of registered U.S. companies, while some were once legitimate businesses, now abandoned and repurposed. Their websites share a single template, a stock photograph on the “About Us” page. The illusion is just good enough. 

The Payload 

The delivered archive carries a PowerShell implant. Buried in the binary, extracted in memory, it avoids leaving clear traces. Once activated, MixShell comes alive. It speaks through DNS queries, hiding commands in TXT records. If blocked, it falls back to HTTP. 

The implant is versatile. It can move files, proxy traffic, run commands, and maintain a quiet channel back to its controller. Persistence is ensured through registry hijacking and clever abuse of Windows components.  

Once inside, it is hard to dislodge. 

Shifting Themes 

Recently, the criminals added a new disguise: artificial intelligence. Emails framed as an “AI Impact Assessment” invite staff to give input on how AI might affect workflows. The message claims to come from leadership. It feels internal, urgent, and important. 

The payload for this AI-themed lure has not yet been seen, but analysts expect the same staged approach: ZIP archive, PowerShell, MixShell. 

Targets 

The campaign is broad, but not random. Victims include large manufacturers, semiconductor firms, aerospace suppliers, and biotech companies. Smaller businesses are also drawn in, offering softer points of entry.  

More than 80% of known victims are U.S.-based. The attackers’ patience extends across borders, with cases also found in Singapore, Japan, and Switzerland. 

Why It Matters 

ZipLine flips the phishing playbook. By forcing the victim to send the first email, the attackers dodge reputation filters and gain instant legitimacy. The campaign shows how trust, once thought a shield, can itself be exploited. 

For defenders, the lesson is that inbound vectors do not always begin with inbound messages. Even a “Contact Us” form can open the door. Protection now requires more than scanning for malicious links. It demands watching the conversation itself, across time, for signs of manipulation. 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

OpenAI rotates certificates after TanStack supply chain attack hits employee devices

May 18, 20264 Mins Read

LiteLLM supply chain attack exposes millions to credential theft

March 30, 20265 Mins Read

Group IB Report: Attackers Are Industrializing Supply Chain Compromise

February 17, 20264 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}