Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - News & Analysis - Trump’s Reckless NIST Purge Puts US Semiconductors, AI Safety at Risk 
News & Analysis Artificial Intelligence Latest News

Trump’s Reckless NIST Purge Puts US Semiconductors, AI Safety at Risk 

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleFebruary 26, 20254 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

The Trump administration is set to significantly weaken the CHIPS Act by terminating hundreds of employees at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the agency responsible for administering the semiconductor incentive program.   

President Biden signed the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act two years ago, investing $53 billion to boost US  semiconductor supply chains, create jobs, and enhance national security. 

According to multiple sources, including Axios and Bloomberg, nearly 500 NIST employees, many of whom were recently hired to support the CHIPS Act, are expected to be dismissed under the pretext of “probationary” firings. 

Mass Firings Threaten CHIPS Act Viability 

According to Robert Maire, an author at SemiWiki, an open forum for semiconductor professionals, NIST, the federal agency under which the CHIPS Act operates, is reportedly preparing to cut 497 employees, with the vast majority working directly on the program. He says, according to sources familiar with the matter: 

  • 57% of CHIPS staff focused on incentives will be let go. 
  • 67% of CHIPS staff focused on research and development will be terminated. 
  • 74 postdoctoral researchers will be among those dismissed. 

    With no personnel left to oversee funding allocations and compliance, the CHIPS Act could effectively be dismantled without direct congressional action. 

    AI and Cybersecurity Programs Also Targeted 

    The layoffs extend beyond semiconductor initiatives. Reports indicate that programs focused on artificial intelligence safety and cybersecurity will also be significantly affected.  

    The US AI Safety Institute (AISI), housed within NIST and dedicated to ensuring the reliability of emerging AI models, has already lost its leader earlier this month. With mass terminations imminent, the institute’s ability to continue its mission is in jeopardy. 

    A Shift in Semiconductor Strategy 

    President Trump has signaled a pivot from the CHIPS Act’s subsidy-based approach to a tariff-based strategy, proposing a 25% tariff on imported semiconductor devices. Instead of directly subsidizing domestic manufacturing, this move aims to penalize foreign chip imports. 

    However, analysts warn that the ramifications could be severe, as the US remains heavily dependent on semiconductor imports. Currently: 

    • 100% of AI chips used in the U.S. are imported from Taiwan. 
    • Intel increasingly relies on foreign production. 
    • 100% of AMD’s chips and the vast majority of memory chips are manufactured overseas. 

        Fueling Uncertainty 

        The expected dismantling of the CHIPS Act is likely to create uncertainty across the semiconductor industry. Companies that previously relied on CHIPS Act funding may now reconsider their investment plans.  

        Analysts suggest that 2025 could see a downturn in wafer fabrication equipment (WFE) spending, reversing earlier projections of a stable or slightly positive year for the sector. 

        Political and Strategic Implications 

        The administration’s decision to gut the CHIPS Act workforce raises concerns over whether this move circumvents congressional intent. With no nominee yet announced to lead NIST, the agency faces an uncertain future.  

        Meanwhile, the country risks losing ground in both AI safety regulation and semiconductor self-sufficiency at a time of heightened global competition, particularly with China. 

        As the Trump administration moves forward with its restructuring of federal economic policies, the semiconductor industry and national security experts will be closely watching the fallout. 

        Potentially Devastating Effects 

        “As the Trump administration continues to hack its way through federal agencies indiscriminately, the latest victim appears to be NIST, reportedly losing at least 500 staff,” comments AI governance and application security expert Willy Leichter, CMO of AppSoc. “Using the logic of “last in, first out,” DOGE is ignoring the merits of employee roles or projects and simply terminating anyone they can easily dump.” 

        Leichter adds that the other mandate seems to be to kill any initiative of the Biden administration, irrespective of its context or value. “On the chopping block are the new AI Safety Institute, tasked with ensuring the safety of AI models and systems, and the Chips for America program intended to protect sensitive chip technology from foreign (largely Chinese) theft. This comes on top of dismantling public and providing collaboration with the Cyber Safety Review Boards.” 

        He says NIST provides a critical backbone for all cybersecurity with essential resources such as the National Vulnerability Database. By federal standards, the agency is small, with some 3,400 employees. Cutting 500 jobs is about 15% of the total workforce – a massive cut at a time when cyber risks are accelerating, and direct attacks on US critical infrastructure and government systems have never been higher.  

        “AI is also a massive security wild card, and destroying important government safety checks could be devastating. The net effect will be to demoralize a critical and highly respected agency, embolden our adversaries to ratchet up their attacks, and put all of us at a direct financial and security risk,” Leichter ends. 

        Kirsten Doyle
        Kirsten Doyle
        Information Security Buzz News Editor

        Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

        • Kirsten Doyle
          AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
        • Kirsten Doyle
          ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
        • Kirsten Doyle
          SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
        • Kirsten Doyle
          Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

        The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

        Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

        Related Posts

        What Are AI SOC Agents? Use Cases, Architecture, and the Leading Vendors

        June 19, 20266 Mins Read

        AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals

        June 19, 20265 Mins Read

        ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day

        June 19, 20263 Mins Read
        ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

        No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

         
        ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
        Black ISB Logo

        Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

        X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

        Working With Us

        • About Us
        • Advertise With Us
        • Contact Us

        Write For Us

        • How To Contribute

        The Pages

        • Privacy Policy
        • Cookie Policy
        • AI Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Copyright Notice

        Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

        Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

        Manage Consent
        To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
        Functional Always active
        The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
        Preferences
        The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
        Statistics
        The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
        Marketing
        The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
        • Manage options
        • Manage services
        • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
        • Read more about these purposes
        View preferences
        • {title}
        • {title}
        • {title}