Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Application Security - Over 20 Malicious Apps on Google Play Found Stealing User Login Credentials
Application Security Attacks Malware News & Analysis Security

Over 20 Malicious Apps on Google Play Found Stealing User Login Credentials

Katrina ThompsonBy Katrina ThompsonJune 19, 20254 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Malicious Apps on Google Play
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Researchers discovered nearly two dozen malicious Android apps designed to steal cryptocurrency credentials and compromise wallets.

The coordinated campaign, uncovered by Cyble Research and Intelligence Labs (CRIL), is comprised of over 20 cryptocurrency phishing applications created to imitate legitimate platforms. Since CRIL reported the issue to Google, most have been removed from the Play Store with more being reported for future takedown.

“If you’ve recently downloaded any of the flagged apps, uninstall them immediately,” states Jamie Akhtar, CEO and Co-founder at CyberSmart, “and run a trusted mobile security scan. It’s also wise to change your passwords, particularly for any accounts accessed via the device, and enable two-factor authentication where possible.”

Anatomy of a Crypto Heist

Threat actors hosted these malicious applications on developer accounts that had once legitimately published apps for gaming, video downloads and livestreaming. Once compromised, these developer accounts became the vehicles for distributing fraudulent imitations of popular cryptocurrency wallets like OpenOcean Exchange, SushiSwap, Raydium, Hyperliquid, and more.

Common threads wound through the campaign’s various cryptocurrency phishing platforms, such as hiding Command and Control (C2) URLs within mandatory privacy policies and redirecting users to a screen where they would be prompted to enter their 12-word mnemonic phrase for backing up and restoring their crypto wallet.

Similar naming conventions were even used, adding unique identifiers to the end of standard strings. For example:

  • Fraudulent Pancake Swap: co.median.android.pkmxaj
  • Fraudulent Suiet Wallet: co.median.android.ljqjry

To avoid detection, the apps were distributed under different developer accounts. And for further obfuscation and resilience, as many as 50 phishing domains were connected to a single IP address. Once downloaded, the apps function via one of the following tactics:

  1. Exploiting the Median Framework | Threat actors leveraged the Median development framework to turn regular phishing websites into Android apps. These embed malicious URLs that load fake wallet interfaces via WebView.
  2. Direct WebView Loading | In some cases, the app bypassed the use of frameworks altogether, directly loading a malicious phishing page that looks exactly like the platform’s interface.

Facing the Fallout: The Rise of Cryptocurrency Scams

Users that downloaded the infected apps are at risk of permanent cryptocurrency loss, as blockchain transactions cannot be reversed lightly, if at all. Immutability is a core feature of blockchain technology, and it is this very permanence that ensures its safety and integrity.

According to the FBI 2023 Cryptocurrency Fraud Report, Americans lost 5.6 billion dollars in cryptocurrency fraud in 2023 alone, a 45% increase from the previous year. In 2024, 5.8 billion in losses were reported for the same reason. These cryptocurrency ploys take on many different faces:

  • Fake investment platforms
  • Fake wallet and exchange apps
  • Pig butchering scams that build and exploit relationships
  • Deepfake-driven scams
  • Phishing via malicious apps

Those who believe they have been involved in a cryptocurrency scam, or any cyber-related fraudulent activity, should contact the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center at https://www.ic3.gov. 

Entering the Age of Consumer Due Diligence in DeFi

Along with deleting the compromised apps, users are encouraged to take security measures into their own hands in the future. “For users, this serves as a critical reminder to exercise caution when downloading new apps, even those hosted on official app stores,” advises Akhtar. “Prior to installation, review app permissions carefully, check developer credentials, and be wary of applications requesting access to sensitive functions that aren’t essential to their stated purpose.”

Akhtar also suggests that users add the following best practices to their security repertoire:

  • Change and update passwords
  • Enable two-factor authentication
  • Look out for suspicious signs like battery drain, unexpected pop-ups, and data usage spikes.

And while Google offers app security through Google Play Protect, coordinated campaigns like this one demonstrate that determined cybercriminals are continuing to find ways around defenses. “[This] recent phishing operation…highlights the importance of user vigilance and the limitations of relying solely on platform security measures,” states Javvad Malik, Lead Security Awareness Advocate at Knowbe4.

And there’s a lesson for users in the DeFi app space, specifically. “For cryptocurrency users, it’s a reminder of the irreversible nature of transactions and the heightened risks in this sector,” Malik concludes. “It reinforces the necessity of thorough verification processes before engaging with any financial applications, regardless of their apparent legitimacy.”

Katrina Thompson

An ardent believer in personal data privacy and the technology behind it, Katrina Thompson is a freelance writer leaning into encryption, data privacy legislation, and the intersection of information technology and human rights. She has written for Bora, Venafi, Tripwire, and many other sites.

  • Katrina Thompson
    What Are AI SOC Agents? Use Cases, Architecture, and the Leading Vendors
  • Katrina Thompson
    How EM is boosting the career trajectory of VM analysts
  • Katrina Thompson
    The 7 Top AI SOC Platforms to Watch in 2026
  • Katrina Thompson
    The Best Exposure Assessment Platforms for 2026

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

AppSec is dead, long live AI security

April 29, 20265 Mins Read

Managing App Access on Frontline Devices in an Always-On World

March 9, 20264 Mins Read

OWASP Top 10 2025: New Enemies, Old Foes, and an Approach to Vulnerability Remediation That Must Evolve

January 22, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}