Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Threats and Vulnerabilities - Persistent Risk: XZ Utils Backdoor Still Lurking in Docker Images
Threats and Vulnerabilities Application Security Latest News News & Analysis Security Software Development Security

Persistent Risk: XZ Utils Backdoor Still Lurking in Docker Images

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleAugust 13, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
XZ Utils Backdoor
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

In March last year, an insidious software supply chain compromise was revealed. The discovery of a backdoor in XZ Utils shook the cybersecurity world, thanks to its technical sophistication and for the bad actor’s methodical patience.

A developer known as “Jia Tan” had spent two years earning trust in the XZ Utils project. The code they contributed was clean. Until it wasn’t.

Hidden inside liblzma.so sat a backdoor. It came to life when a client connected to an infected SSH server. It hooked into critical cryptographic functions: RSA_public_decrypt, RSA_get0_key, and EVP_PKEY_set1_RSA,  granting the attacker silent access. 

Debian, Fedora, and OpenSUSE shipped the poisoned packages. This was a supply chain compromise on a scale that left little untouched. Within a day, Binarly released XZ.fail, a free tool to detect malicious IFUNC resolvers. 

The story should have ended there. It hasn’t.

Old Poison in New Bottles

Binarly has found the backdoor again. This time in Docker images.

At least 12 Debian-based images on Docker Hub still carry the malicious code. More than 35 in total show signs of infection. Some of these images were used to build others. The infection spreads silently through “second-order” images, and likely beyond.

Binarly’s scan covered only a fraction of Docker Hub. They focused on Debian because it keeps historical image data. The extent of infections in Fedora, OpenSUSE, and other distributions remains unknown. 

The findings come from a 15-terabyte dataset of Docker images. Binarly used it to sharpen its detection tools, searching for the same ELF file anomalies and IFUNC hooks seen in the original compromise.

They found them.

A Chain That Keeps Building

Second-order infections mean the risk is not frozen in time. Each compromised base image can spawn new images. Those, in turn, can be reused again. Third-order, fourth-order, and so on.

Tracking this is hard. Docker Hub holds almost 12 million repositories. Many have hundreds of images. There is no direct way to trace every descendant. Binarly resorted to manual mapping and targeted searches.

Some infected images are outdated. Others are tagged as the latest build. That means developers (or automated systems) could still be pulling them into active use.

Warnings Unheeded

Binarly notified Debian maintainers and asked for removal of the images. They remain online. 

The persistence of this backdoor is a warning. Supply chain compromises do not vanish when patches land. Copies survive. They are cached, forked, republished. They wait for someone to pull them into a live environment.

The XZ Utils backdoor was a lesson in patience and precision from an attacker. Its lingering presence in Docker images is a lesson in how long a breach can echo. 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Palo Alto warns of active exploitation of GlobalProtect authentication bypass flaw

June 2, 20263 Mins Read

How EM is boosting the career trajectory of VM analysts

May 19, 20266 Mins Read

Microsoft patches 138 vulnerabilities as AI-driven discovery accelerates

May 14, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}