Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Data Protection - Microsoft: Python-Powered Infostealers Are Now Targeting macOS at Scale
Data Protection Attacks Data Loss Prevention Latest News News & Analysis Security Software Development Security

Microsoft: Python-Powered Infostealers Are Now Targeting macOS at Scale

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleFebruary 5, 20265 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Python-Powered Infostealers
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Microsoft has warned that information-stealing attacks are rapidly expanding beyond Windows to target Apple macOS environments using cross-platform languages such as Python. 

The software giant’s Defender Security Research Team has observed macOS-targeted infostealer campaigns using social engineering techniques like ClickFix since late 2025 to distribute disk image (DMG) installers that deploy stealer malware families like Atomic macOS Stealer (AMOS), MacSync, and DigitStealer.  

The campaigns have been using techniques like fileless execution, native macOS utilities, and AppleScript automation to facilitate data theft, including web browser credentials and session data, iCloud Keychain, and developer secrets. 

The basis for these attacks is usually a malicious ad, most often delivered via Google Ads, that tricks users searching for tools such as DynamicLake and artificial intelligence (AI) tools into visiting fake websites that use ClickFix lures, fooling users into infecting their own systems with malware. 

“Python-based stealers are being leveraged by attackers to rapidly adapt, reuse code, and target heterogeneous environments with minimal overhead,” Microsoft said. “They are typically distributed via phishing emails.”  

The company added: “Three major Mac-focused stealer campaigns include DigitStealer (distributed through fake DynamicLake software), MacSync (delivered via copy-paste Terminal commands), and Atomic Stealer (using fake AI tool installers).” 

The company said all three harvest the same types of data, browser credentials, saved passwords, cryptocurrency wallet information, and developer secrets. From there, everything is sent to attacker servers before deleting traces of the infection. 

Another, PXA Stealer, has been linked to Vietnamese-speaking threat actors and can harvest login credentials, financial information, and browser data. Microsoft said it identified two PXA Stealer campaigns that used phishing emails for initial access.  

Also, threat actors have been observed weaponizing popular messaging apps like WhatsApp to distribute malware like Eternidade Stealer to get their hands on access to financial and cryptocurrency accounts. 

Pre-empting Attackers 

Trey Ford, Chief Strategy and Trust Officer at Bugcrowd, said this attack highlights the need to maintain a continuous offensive view of our technology estate, in an effort to identify and address exposed vulnerabilities before adverse events. 

“Threat actors are moving faster than many defenders, increasingly leveraging AI-powered offensive capabilities to gain a foothold to meet their objectives. The classical “annual penetration test” is far from effective today, it is time that we (defenders, service providers, and the regulatory and audit groups) refactor the objectives of offensive testing from a first-principles perspective. The goal should be to pre-empt attackers in identifying and addressing exposures, preventing adverse outcomes.” 

Leveraging Cross-Platform Languages 

Robert Coles, Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at Black Duck, said infostealers are evolving as one of the most effective initial access tools used by today’s threat actors. “Once considered a Windows only issue, the threat is now operating across Windows and macOS, leveraging cross-platform languages such as Python. This is not your typical attack, using a software vulnerability. Instead, the user is persuaded into running a trusted system utility to “fix” something or run a trojanized installer that appears to be a legitimate application.” 

Malvertising, phishing, and fake software updates are typically used to deliver the infostealer, Coles added. “Once a user is convinced to run the compromised application, it will harvest browser credentials and cookies, session tokens to bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA), financial and crypto data, and even gather cloud, developer, and API credentials.” 

He said using stolen credentials can lead to account takeovers across Software as a Service (SaaS) and cloud platforms. Follow-on attacks could also happen, such as ransomware and business email compromise (BEC). 

Defending against these attacks takes both the human and technology, Coles explained. “For the human, user awareness training that will provide focus on fake installers, updates, and command execution.  Technology driving defense should include behavior-based endpoint protection, blocking untrusted software, least-privilege, and monitoring outbound traffic. It is now more important than ever to consistently apply this to both Windows and macOS.” 

Targeting Overconfident Environments 

Shane Barney, Chief Information Security Officer at Keeper Security, commented. “Infostealer campaigns like this work because they target the point where most environments are still overconfident: what happens after access is granted. These attackers are not trying to defeat macOS security controls. They are deliberately avoiding that path by convincing users to install software or run commands that appear legitimate. Once that step occurs, the operating system largely fades into the background.” 

By relying on native tools, scripting languages like Python and trusted distribution channels, attackers blend into normal activity and minimize detection, Barney said. “The real objective is to quietly collect credentials, session tokens and developer secrets that can be reused later. In many environments, those stolen credentials are not even tied to a human login. They include service tokens, API keys and automation credentials that operate continuously and often without the same visibility or controls.” 

He said this is why these campaigns scale so effectively. “A valid session token or developer credential works just as well on macOS as it does on Windows, and it bypasses many of the controls security teams still rely on to identify intrusions.” 

The defensive takeaway is uncomfortable but necessary, Barney concluded. “Security teams can no longer assume that stopping infection is enough. Modern environments have shown that credential exposure is inevitable at some point. The priority must be limiting what those credentials can do once compromised.” 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Dutch police, NCSC take down major botnet
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Palo Alto warns of active exploitation of GlobalProtect authentication bypass flaw

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Visual data is the blind spot in enterprise security: that’s about to change

May 4, 20267 Mins Read

Making stolen data worthless: why security must start with the data

March 30, 20265 Mins Read

Meta’s Smart Glasses Privacy Scandal Expands After Sama Credentials Found on the Dark Web

March 10, 20264 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}