Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Ransomware - Ransomware in 2025: More Attacks, Bigger Targets, Fewer Confirmations
Ransomware Attacks Critical Infrastructure Security Latest News News & Analysis Security

Ransomware in 2025: More Attacks, Bigger Targets, Fewer Confirmations

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleJuly 7, 20254 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Ransomware in 2025
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

The ransomware crisis continues to deepen. In the first half of 2025, 3,627 attacks were logged worldwide, a 47% jump from the same period last year. But confirmation remains scarce.

According to Comparitech, of those incidents, just 445 were publicly acknowledged by victims. The rest were claimed by threat actors on their leak sites, often without official word from the organizations themselves.

Governments and schools are feeling the heat. Attacks on public-sector bodies rose nearly 60% year-on-year. Educational institutions also saw a marked increase, up 23%, with schools, colleges, and universities scrambling to keep up. Healthcare, long a favorite target, bucked the trend. Its increase was modest: just 5%.

Business, meanwhile, is booming, for attackers at least. Companies saw a 50% surge in ransomware hits, but some sectors were hit harder than others. Technology firms recorded an 88% spike. Retail followed closely at 85%, then legal (71%), transportation (66%), and manufacturing (64%). Only utilities saw a drop, down 31%.

Across the 445 confirmed attacks, 17 million records were breached. That’s well below the 279.6 million reported this time last year, but it’s not cause for comfort. Breaches often go undisclosed for months. Many figures for 2025 are likely to rise in due time.

The Sector Breakdown 

Of the confirmed 445 cases:

  • 260 hit businesses 
  • 93 hit government agencies 
  • 52 hit healthcare providers 
  • 40 hit educational institutions

The remaining 38 couldn’t be tied to a specific sector.

On the unconfirmed side, ransomware groups claimed:

  • 2,783 attacks on businesses 
  • 110 on government 
  • 161 on healthcare 
  • 90 on education

Average ransom demands vary by sector. Government organizations faced the steepest asks, around $3 million. Businesses averaged $1.2 million, healthcare $776,000, and education $556,000.

Despite the pressure, few targets admitted to paying. None confirmed that they had.

The Worst of the Breaches

The five largest ransomware-related data breaches in H1 2025 share something in common: none have been claimed by a known ransomware group. That could suggest quiet negotiations, or paid ransoms. 

  1. Episource, LLC (US): 5.4 million people affected. Clients Sharp HealthCare and Sharp Community Medical Group issued separate breach notices. 
  1. Hoken Minaoshi Honpo Group (Japan): 5.1 million records breached in February. 
  1. Sanrio Entertainment (Japan): 2 million records leaked from Sanrio Puroland theme park in January. 
  1. Newton Financial Consulting (Japan): 1.3 million impacted in a February attack. 
  1. Frederick Health (US): 934,326 patient records breached in January.

Other major incidents affected Utsunomiya Central Clinic (Japan), Nova Scotia Power (Canada), and Ocuco Limited (Ireland), among others.

Many of these breaches occurred in early 2025,  but only came to light months later.

Biggest Ransom Demands

The largest known demands this year came mostly from attacks on public institutions.

  • Slovakia’s Geodesy and Cartography Office was hit with a $12 million demand in January. No payment was made. 
  • Malaysia Airports Holdings faced a $10 million demand from Qilin in March. The group claimed to have stolen 2 TB of data. 
  • Hungary’s National Archaeological Institute was hit by RansomHub in February. Demand: $10 million. 
  • Kenya’s National Social Security Fund was attacked in May. Devman demanded $4.5 million. 
  • Cleveland Municipal Court (US) was asked for $4 million by Qilin. The court did not pay.

Ransom demands for other public and private entities ranged from $2 million to $2.6 million.

The Gangs Behind the Curtain

Akira, Clop, and Qilin dominated the first half of the year in terms of volume.

  • Akira led with 347 claimed attacks. 
  • Clop followed with 333. 
  • Qilin trailed closely with 318. 
  • RansomHub (222), Play (214), and SafePay (186) rounded out the top six.

In terms of confirmed attacks, Qilin was responsible for 40, followed by RansomHub (27), Akira (25), SafePay (19), and INC (19).

Their victim profiles vary. Akira and SafePay mostly hit businesses. INC leaned into healthcare and government. RansomHub and Qilin spread their attacks more evenly across sectors.

Confirmed vs. Unconfirmed

A ransomware attack is marked as “confirmed” when the victim publicly discloses it or when the public statement matches a known ransomware group’s claim. If a gang makes a claim and the organization stays silent, it remains “unconfirmed.”

Some groups lie. Others jump the gun. And many victims simply don’t want the world to know they were hit, or coughed up.

That’s why confirmed numbers are often a fraction of reality. And why, month by month, figures shift as more incidents are publicly acknowledged. The ransomware landscape is never static. Like the criminals behind it, it adapts.

All data here is sourced from a live ransomware tracker, updated daily. The threat is growing. The numbers prove it. But the full picture? That’s still coming into focus. 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Dutch police, NCSC take down major botnet
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Palo Alto warns of active exploitation of GlobalProtect authentication bypass flaw

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Foxconn confirms cyberattack following Nitrogen ransomware claims

May 14, 20263 Mins Read

Lazarus Group Turns to Medusa Ransomware in Escalating Global Extortion Campaign

February 26, 20263 Mins Read

The Cyberattack That Exposed the Fragility of Digital Heritage

February 11, 20268 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}