Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Threats and Vulnerabilities - Six New Windows Vulnerabilities Found, Including First Rust-Based Kernel Flaw
Threats and Vulnerabilities Latest News News & Analysis Security

Six New Windows Vulnerabilities Found, Including First Rust-Based Kernel Flaw

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleAugust 14, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Six New Windows Vulnerabilities
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Six new vulnerabilities have been found in Microsoft Windows. One is critical. All are serious.

Check Point Research discovered the flaws and disclosed them privately to Microsoft. Patches were released on 12 August as part of Patch Tuesday.

The risks are varied: system crashes, arbitrary code execution, and information leaks. For attackers, the attack surface is wide. For defenders, the response must be immediate.

One flaw is notable beyond its severity. It may be the first publicly disclosed vulnerability in a Rust-based component of the Windows kernel. Rust was introduced to improve memory safety, a longstanding challenge in operating systems.

But here, the flaw was not a traditional memory bug. Rust detected an underlying condition, and instead of handling it quietly, the system responded with a complete crash. 

A kernel-level crash leaves no room for recovery. The machine stops. Unsaved work is lost. For a single device, this is inconvenient. For an enterprise with thousands of endpoints, it can mean hours of interruption, loss of productivity, and a scramble to restore operations. The promise of safer code does not remove the need for relentless testing and rapid remediation.

Two other vulnerabilities deserve close attention. Both are memory corruption flaws that allow arbitrary code execution. One carries a critical severity rating. Exploitation is straightforward: an attacker delivers a specially crafted file, the user opens it, and the malicious payload executes. From there, the attacker gains the ability to run any code, deploy remote access tools, exfiltrate data, or install persistence mechanisms that survive reboots. 

The remaining vulnerabilities focus on information disclosure. While these often require local access, one case is different. CVE-2025-47984 allows a memory leak over the network. Sensitive information could be exposed without an attacker ever touching the physical device. This type of flaw can serve as a stepping stone, revealing tokens, credentials, or other artifacts that enable deeper intrusions.

The implications are broader than the six CVEs. Even in mature, widely deployed platforms, weaknesses continue to emerge. New programming languages reduce certain classes of errors but cannot eliminate them entirely. Complexity remains the enemy.

The defensive measures are familiar yet vital. Apply the August updates without delay. Monitor networks for suspicious activity. Reduce the window of exposure before these vulnerabilities are weaponized.

Check Point customers already have protections in place. Our solutions detect and block attempts to exploit these flaws, maintaining coverage even before official patches are deployed.

Security is not a fixed state. It is a cycle, discover, patch, adapt. Each vulnerability closed today is another challenge deferred to tomorrow. That cycle will not end. But it can be managed. And for defenders, that management is the difference between resilience and compromise. 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    Klue supply chain breach exposes Salesforce data at several security firms
  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Palo Alto warns of active exploitation of GlobalProtect authentication bypass flaw

June 2, 20263 Mins Read

How EM is boosting the career trajectory of VM analysts

May 19, 20266 Mins Read

Microsoft patches 138 vulnerabilities as AI-driven discovery accelerates

May 14, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}