Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Artificial Intelligence - Thales Data Threat Report: AI and Cloud Complexity Fuel New Data Security Risks
Artificial Intelligence Cloud Security Latest News News & Analysis Security Study & Research Threat Intelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities

Thales Data Threat Report: AI and Cloud Complexity Fuel New Data Security Risks

Josh Breaker RolfeBy Josh Breaker RolfeMarch 5, 20264 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Thales Report AI and Cloud
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

A new report from Thales highlights how artificial intelligence is reshaping the cybersecurity landscape, introducing new attack vectors while amplifying existing data protection challenges. 

The 2026 Thales Data Threat Report finds that as organizations accelerate AI adoption, they are simultaneously increasing their exposure to cloud threats, identity attacks, and operational complexity.  

Based on a survey of more than 3000 IT and security professionals across 20 countries, the report highlights how AI-driven innovation is creating both opportunity and risk. Organizations are increasingly dependent on data to power AI applications, yet many still lack visibility into where that data resides or how it is secured.  

AI Expands the Attack Surface 

Security professionals are paying greater attention to AI security. Thirty percent of organizations now have a dedicated cybersecurity budget for AI security – up from 20% the previous year – though more than half are still funding AI protections through existing security budgets.  

This reflects concerns around the difficulty in security AI ecosystems. 70% of respondents cited the rapid change in AI technologies as the top security concern, making it difficult for security teams to keep pace with evolving threats and infrastructure.  

At the same time, AI-powered attacks are becoming more common. The report reveals that 59% of organizations have experienced deepfake-related incidents, while 57% reported an increase in AI-generated misinformation attacks. Nearly half of respondents said their organization had already suffered reputational damage as a result of AI-driven disinformation campaigns.  

Cloud Assets Remain the Top Target 

Cloud environments continue to be the most attractive targets for attackers. The survey found that cloud storage, cloud-based applications, and cloud management infrastructure collectively represent the top three attack targets for cybercriminals.  

Credential theft remains the most common attack technique against cloud infrastructure, with 67% of respondents reporting an increase in incidents involving stolen credentials or misappropriated secrets. 

Despite the obvious risks, many organizations still have gaps in basic data protection practices. Only about half of sensitive data stored in the cloud is currently encrypted, the report says.  

Visibility is another major challenge. Just 34% of organizations said they have complete knowledge of where their data is stored, making it difficult to implement effective protection strategies. 

Complexity Undermines Security 

Operational complexity continues to weaken security posture. The report shows that organizations use an average of seven different tools for data protection and monitoring, with 77% running five or more tools in this category.  

While the proliferation of tools is intended to improve security coverage, it often produces the opposite effect. Only 39% of respondents say they feel confident in their understanding of their organization’s data security tools, suggesting that tool sprawl may be creating blind spots. 

And that complexity creates more opportunity for human error – which is likely why it remains the leading cause of data breaches, cited by 28% of respondents, followed by exploitation of known vulnerabilities and zero-day attacks. 

Quantum and Sovereignty Risks Rise 

Looking ahead, the report identifies quantum computing as an emerging security concern. 61% of respondents said their primary quantum-related worry is the “harvest now, decrypt later” threat, in which attackers collect encrypted data today in the hope that future quantum computers will be able to decrypt it.  

In response, many organizations are beginning to explore post-quantum cryptography. Nearly 60% said they are already prototyping or evaluating post-quantum cryptographic algorithms. 

Moreover, data sovereignty is becoming a strategic priority as geopolitical pressures and regulatory requirements increase. More than half of organizations reported that they are refactoring applications and data architectures to meet sovereignty objectives, while 36% believe strong encryption and key management can help maintain compliance regardless of where data is stored.  

The “New Insider Threat” 

Ultimately, the report argues that AI itself may become a new type of insider threat. As AI agents gain autonomous access to corporate systems and sources, they could unintentionally expose sensitive information if security controls are not properly implemented.  

As such, security teams face a difficult balancing act: enabling innovation while maintaining strict control over data. According to the report, organizations must improve data visibility, reduce security complexity, and strengthen encryption practices to keep pace with the rapidl evolving AI ecosystem. 

Josh Breaker Rolfe

Josh is a Content writer at Bora. He graduated with a degree in Journalism in 2021 and has a background in cybersecurity PR. He's written on a wide range of topics, from AI to Zero Trust, and is particularly interested in the impacts of cybersecurity on the wider economy.

  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    50+ Organizations Breached Due to Missing MFA
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Red Hat OpenShift AI Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Seize Infrastructure Control
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Users Share Personal, Emotional, Confidential Info with ChatGPT

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

From AI hype to operational reality: A practitioner’s framework for securing agentic systems

June 5, 20267 Mins Read

Artificial intelligence and elections: When an election is annulled because of TikTok

June 1, 20268 Mins Read

NCSC warns organisations not to rush into agentic AI

May 19, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}