Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Software Development Security - UK Businesses Hit by Wave of Breaches Caused by Insecure Code
Software Development Security Attacks News & Analysis Security Threats and Vulnerabilities

UK Businesses Hit by Wave of Breaches Caused by Insecure Code

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleAugust 19, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
UK Businesses Insecure Code
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

A new survey has revealed the extent to which poor coding practices are leaving UK businesses exposed. Two-thirds of senior technology leaders admitted their organisations suffered at least one breach or serious security incident in the past year. The common cause: insecure code.

SecureFlag’s research found that of the 100 executives surveyed, nearly half reported facing more than one incident in twelve months. Despite the scale of the problem, 40 percent of organisations still do not require their developers to undergo regular secure coding training.

“This should be a wake-up call for every business that develops software,” said Andrea Scaduto, CEO and co-founder of SecureFlag. “It’s frankly shocking that in 2025 so many breaches are still happening because of avoidable coding flaws. Our survey exposes a clear and present danger: too many development teams lack the security training to prevent vulnerabilities, and attackers are exploiting that gap. The message is loud and clear – without a serious investment in developer education, organisations will continue to be at risk.” 

The report highlights a gap between what leaders know and what they do. Almost nine in ten respondents recognised insecure code as a serious threat. Far fewer acted on that knowledge. Only one in three companies provide continuous, practical training. Fewer still expressed strong confidence in their developers’ ability to produce secure code.

Constraints of time, budget, and expertise were the most common reasons given for not training staff. The costs of inaction, however, were substantial. Respondents described breaches that led to customer data loss, system outages, and heavy financial impact. 

Broader research supports the urgency of the issue. The UK government’s most recent Cyber Security Breaches Survey found that 43% of businesses experienced an attack or breach in the past year. SecureFlag’s report goes further, identifying insecure code as a central factor. The most common flaws included weak authentication processes, unchecked input leading to SQL injection, and insufficient testing before release.

“The fact that so many organizations are being compromised through code errors is alarming, said Emilio Pinna, SecureFlag’s CTO and co-founder. “Breaches stemming from coding mistakes are preventable – but only if companies invest in proper training,” he said. “We urge businesses not to wait for a disaster. Ensuring your developers can recognize and avoid vulnerabilities must be a top priority. It’s far cheaper to train a developer than to clean up after a breach.”

SecureFlag says it will continue its push to make secure coding the standard rather than the exception.  

The company’s message to industry leaders is blunt. The threat is here, the costs are real, and the solution is clear: train the developers, or pay the price. 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt

June 11, 20264 Mins Read

Closing the Cross-Platform Security Gap in Citizen Developer Apps

February 13, 20265 Mins Read

Empowering Citizen Developers Without Compromising Security

August 13, 20254 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}