Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Hardware Security - 2000 Un-Patched Palo Alto Firewalls Exploited Via PAN-OS Vulnerabilities
Hardware Security Attacks Latest News News & Analysis Security Threat Intelligence Threats and Vulnerabilities

2000 Un-Patched Palo Alto Firewalls Exploited Via PAN-OS Vulnerabilities

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleNovember 25, 20244 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Firewalls
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

More than 2,000 Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS firewalls have been targeted following the disclosure and patching of two security vulnerabilities earlier this month—one of which is classified as critical. This was reported by the Shadowserver Foundation on 20 November.

Warnings Unheeded

Palo Alto Networks and its threat intelligence team, Unit 42, issued a security advisory regarding the active exploitation of the vulnerabilities, calling them a significant threat, as attackers could leverage them to compromise administrative privileges and deploy malicious payloads.

CVE-2024-0012, an authentication bypass flaw, allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the management interface to gain administrative control over PAN-OS devices. Once exploited, this vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2024-9474, a privilege escalation issue, enabling attackers to execute unauthorized administrative actions, tamper with configurations, and deploy malicious software.

Palo Alto Networks stressed that securing access to the management interface—restricting it to trusted internal IP addresses—is a critical mitigation step. Fixes for both vulnerabilities are available, and the company urged customers to apply these patches immediately.

Operation “Lunar Peek” and Active Exploitation

The exploitation campaign, dubbed “Operation Lunar Peek,” was initially detected targeting a small number of PAN-OS management web interfaces exposed to untrusted networks. Activity intensified after 19 November, when third-party researchers published technical insights and proof-of-concept artifacts, enabling broader threat activity.

Unit 42 has observed malicious actors employing both manual and automated techniques to exploit the vulnerabilities. Post-compromise activities include the deployment of web shells, interactive command execution, and the installation of malware such as crypto miners and open-source command-and-control (C2) tools.

Indicators of compromise (IOCs) identified by Unit 42 include obfuscated web shell payloads and the use of specific user-agent strings during exploitation attempts. A comprehensive list of IOCs is available on the Unit 42 Timely Threat Intel GitHub repository.

Mitigation and Customer Guidance

To mitigate risk, Palo Alto Networks recommends:

  • Applying Security Patches: Update PAN-OS to the latest version to address CVE-2024-0012 and CVE-2024-9474.
  • Securing Management Interfaces: Restrict access to trusted internal IP addresses, aligning with the company’s best practice deployment guidelines.
  • Monitoring for Suspicious Activity: Investigate abnormal behavior on devices with exposed management interfaces.

Unit 42 also advises entities to remain vigilant for any post-compromise activity and to review network configurations to limit exposure.

Palo Alto Networks has shared its findings with members of the Cyber Threat Alliance (CTA), enabling rapid deployment of protective measures across the cybersecurity ecosystem. The company says it will continue to work with external researchers, partners, and customers to monitor and mitigate the evolving threat landscape.

What the Industry is Saying

Elad Luz, Head of Research at Oasis Security, says even before patching, affected customers should immediately restrict access to the web management interface, preferably allowing only internal IPs.

“The numbers reported by Shadowserver are very concerning, indicating that 7% of customers were compromised. With such a high ratio, it is essential not only to patch, but also to ensure that the device is free from any potential malware that may have been dropped or malicious configurations that may have been applied. We strongly recommend that users review their firewall configurations after applying the patch to ensure nothing has been altered.

Finally, Luz says users should check their audit logs for administrator activity to determine if a threat actor used the web interface for any malicious actions.

Assessing the Potential Damage

“Beyond patching, security teams must prioritize assessing the potential damage from compromised firewalls,” adds Patrick Tiquet, Vice President of Security & Architecture at Keeper Security. “This includes checking for unauthorized access, scanning for malware, and reviewing configurations to ensure no additional vulnerabilities were introduced during the attack.”

Organizations should also adopt a proactive approach to managing their attack surface, such as restricting access to management interfaces, implementing strong authentication and leveraging Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions to protect administrative controls. “While patching is critical, ongoing vigilance and layered defenses are equally essential to minimize risks from similar threats in the future,” Tiquet explains.

Points to Consider

Mayuresh Dani, Manager, of Security Research at Qualys Threat Research Unit, says security teams should consider several points while approaching these CVEs. “Definitively patching all vulnerable PAN-OS devices is the first step. They should secure access to the management interface by restricting access only to trusted IP addresses, reducing the attack surface. Sift through their installations and make sure none of the IOCs exist on their system. If any of these exist, they should follow their organizational IR steps to remediate these devices.”

Teams should go through their installations, verifying that they have not been altered in any way and undoing those changes, Dani adds. “If this cannot be done, the last known good configuration update should be restored and verified to be working properly. Any virtual PAN-OS versions should be strictly checked for jump-to-host exploit conditions and upgraded or decommissioned accordingly.”

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Hezbollah Pager Attack: A Wake-up Call to Tech Manufacturers to Secure their Supply Chains?

September 19, 20244 Mins Read

Deadly Pager Explosions in Lebanon Linked to Possible Supply Chain Attack

September 18, 20243 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}