Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Viewing Enterprise Cryptography In A New Light: Traversing A Fragmented Environment
Articles

Viewing Enterprise Cryptography In A New Light: Traversing A Fragmented Environment

Professor Yehuda LindellBy Professor Yehuda LindellMay 24, 2021Updated:January 19, 20235 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Quantum Cryptography Company
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Cryptography has taken a tumultuous journey over the past 20 years. As the digital world has evolved, its role in protecting the modern enterprise has become more crucial than ever. Cyber attackers now lie in wait for businesses, and there is no perimeter strong enough to keep them out. As a result, organisations are deploying zero-trust solutions, ensuring security even in the case of a breach. The modern security challenge has been made even more complicated by the move to remote working, BYOD policies and increasingly hybrid scenarios involving an organization’s data centers and multiple clouds. Cryptography is now increasingly needed in the modern environment of remote management, but the pace needed in implementing it enterprise-wide is a challenge all in itself.

At the core of this is the fact that the cryptographic space is currently highly fragmented, with numerous solutions inherently utilizing the technology. There are many ways to authenticate identity, such as passwords, OTP and smartcards, plus numerous cryptographic methods for encrypting databases, VMs, storage and more across different clouds and data centers. To add further complexity, cryptographic signatures are also required for documents, transactions and code. Multiple point and siloed solutions can result in reduced visibility, agility, and flexibility, not to mention the strain on management with high costs involved in the deployment in different environments.

Determining a new approach

Managing and deploying cryptographic solutions in the modern age requires a new approach, with multiple layers to consider:

  • Making the shift to hybrid hardware and software: Hardware solutions have traditionally powered legacy key protection. In today’s environments where everything is virtualized and managed remotely, and enterprises are moving to cloud deployments, pure hardware solutions constitute a significant obstacle. As a result, software solutions for key protection with strong guarantees are needed to replace and complement existing hardware.
  • Transforming from siloed to unified key management: While legacy key protection and management has been comprised of different solutions, a unified approach with one platform that can support all cryptographic solutions in any environment is needed today.
  • Ensuring integrated key management and key protection: Legacy key protection provides only simplistic management and dedicated key management solutions are often not integrated with key protection. A unified platform providing integrated key protection and management is required.
  • Key misuse prevention: Legacy key protection solutions address the problem of key theft only. Today, key misuse must be addressed as an integral part of key protection.
  • Adopting an agile infrastructure: Rigidity plagues legacy key protection and management solutions. Cryptography standards are continually changing; updates must be rolled out quickly and new threats need to be considered and resolved. Today’s cryptographic infrastructure needs to support agility.
  • Speeding up deployment: Legacy cryptographic solutions that relied solely on hardware were ultimately slow in deployment. Today, enterprise security teams must offer on-demand cryptographic services internally in order to quickly support business needs.

Evidently, the fragmented legacy cryptographic infrastructure of the 1990s does not support modern business needs and is in desperate need of modernization.

Clearing a path

To address these challenges, firstly, modern solutions are needed that are based on openness and transparency in collaborative environments. Second, modern computing environments need modern software. Third, a new technological approach is required to deliver a software key store with proven security guarantees to complement legacy hardware and support new security requirements. Legacy solutions involved building a fortress around the device that held key material and prevented any attacker from breaching that machine. In today’s zero-trust environments, this is problematic when it comes to software-only solutions.

A different approach is to ensure that cryptographic keys are never kept in one single place at any particular time, forcing a cyber attacker to simultaneously breach several machines in order to gather information. That way there would be no single point of security failure, and strong separations between the different machines would make it extremely hard to breach.

The question however still remains; How can one cryptographic operation such as decryption or signing be carried out without holding the key? Fortunately, a methodology called Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC), also known as threshold cryptography, can do exactly this. Using MPC, the secret key is generated in two or more parts called shares, so that all shares are needed to get any information about the key. These different shares reside on different servers and devices, so that an attacker has to breach them all to steal the key. 

MPC protocols enable different machines to obtain the result of the cryptographic operation, without combining any of the shares or revealing any sensitive information about the key. This means the key remains fully protected, even while in use. MPC protocols have mathematical proofs of security, guaranteeing that an attacker who cannot breach all machines is unable to learn anything about the key, even if they know the protocols used. Although anti-intuitive, when using MPC, the key is never whole in any single place, not whilst in use or while the code is generated.

Adopting a unified solution

In moving to a unified approach to key storage, organizations can ensure transformation in their existing fragmented infrastructure, allowing for improvements in efficiency, security, user experience and cost savings, while providing the necessary infrastructure for all cryptographic requirements in the business. Virtualizing cryptography allows for consistency with how other software works within the organization, ensuring scalability in cloud or on-premise environments and enabling agility in a cost-effective manner. Most critically, however, such solutions allow key orchestration across the enterprise and management of all cryptographic solutions from one location, bringing cryptography into a new technological phase.

Professor Yehuda Lindell

CEO and Co-founder

    The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

    Related Posts

    The Real Cost of Inconsistent Third-Party Access

    December 18, 20255 Mins Read

    What Happens When Devices Cross Borders? The Role of Geofencing in Global IT

    August 7, 20256 Mins Read

    The Evolving Importance of Identity Governance in FinTech

    July 10, 20258 Mins Read
    ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

    No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

     
    ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
    Black ISB Logo

    Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

    X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

    Working With Us

    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    Write For Us

    • How To Contribute

    The Pages

    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • AI Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Copyright Notice

    Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Manage Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}