Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - API Security - Zimperium Warns Mobile Apps Are the New API Battleground
API Security Latest News News & Analysis Security Study & Research

Zimperium Warns Mobile Apps Are the New API Battleground

Kirsten DoyleBy Kirsten DoyleSeptember 22, 20256 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Mobile Apps Are the New API
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

APIs, the invisible engines powering modern mobile apps, are fast becoming one of the biggest security liabilities in enterprise technology.  

That’s the warning from Zimperium’s 2025 Global Mobile Threat Report, which describes mobile applications as an “attack surface hiding in plain sight.” 

The report shows just how exposed most apps really are. Nearly half still contain hardcoded secrets like API keys. A third of Android apps (and more than half of iOS apps) leak sensitive data.  

Even more worrying, 24% of Android and 60% of iOS apps lack protection against reverse engineering, making it easy for attackers to extract tokens, map API endpoints, and manipulate traffic. 

The risks are amplified on compromised devices: one in 400 Android phones is rooted, and one in 2,500 iOS devices is jailbroken. That gives bad actors full control to tamper with apps, intercept communications, and automate fraud.  

Finance and travel apps, in particular, remain dangerously exposed, with one in three Android finance apps and one in five iOS travel apps still vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks. 

Traditional API security measures (gateways, proxies, and firewalls) were built for perimeter defense. But as Zimperium notes, they fall short in untrusted mobile environments where adversaries operate directly on the client side.  

Tools like Frida and Xposed allow traffic manipulation before it even leaves the device. Meanwhile, SSL pinning, while designed to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks, also hampers visibility for API gateways. 

Protecting APIs only at the perimeter is not enough, the report warns.  

The solution, it says, is to extend protection into the app itself: hardening APIs against reverse engineering and requiring every request to prove it comes from a genuine, uncompromised app and device. 

That means combining runtime defenses, code obfuscation, and secure key storage with app attestation, so backends can block traffic from clones, emulators, and compromised devices.  

Schema validation alone, the report stresses, cannot defend against business logic abuses such as price manipulation or unauthorized access. 

Protection for Users, Too 

Randolph Barr, Chief Information Security Officer at Cequence Security, says from a security perspective, we need to ensure that mobile devices have basic protections, not just for the organization, but also for the users themselves.  

“At a minimum, this means ensuring a screen lock is enabled, updates are applied in a timely manner, and that devices are not rooted (Android) or jailbroken (iOS). The real challenge is perception as users often see Mobile Device Management (MDM) as invasive, and executives sometimes see it as an unnecessary cost or a productivity hindrance.” 

Reframe MDM as a Protective Meaure 

The way forward is communication, Barr adds. “Security leaders need to reframe MDM as a protective measure that benefits everyone. For employees, that means emphasizing that MDM helps safeguard their personal data as much as company data, and clarifying that it does not equate to “spying.” For executives, the message should be tied to business risk and accountability, unmanaged devices increase the likelihood of breaches, regulatory fines, and reputational harm.” 

Additionally, he says MDM and BYOD programs will increasingly need to integrate AI-driven app vetting and behavioral analysis into their security stack.  

These corporate tools can do what the app stores won’t:  

  • Perform enhanced due diligence on installed apps by leveraging AI to analyze metadata, behavior, and network traffic  
  • Enforce ownership transparency checks by using AI to map developer identities and flag hidden ties.  
  • Monitor data flow and storage behavior on the device, identifying apps that may exfiltrate data  
  • Apply real-time app behavior analysis to detect threats post-installation  
  • Provide continuous monitoring and re-evaluation of app risk as threat landscapes evolve  

While MDM and BYOD controls are not a silver bullet, incorporating AI into these solutions can strengthen a layered security approach, raising the bar for attackers and reducing organizational risk, even when app stores fall short, Barr says. 

“Furthermore, security leaders must build resilience while enabling innovation. They need to communicate the value of controls like AI-enhanced MDM not just as risk mitigation, but as enablers of secure digital agility. If Apple and Google won’t prioritize user protection through better enforcement, enterprises will have to fill that gap themselves with smarter, adaptive tools that protect both data and business continuity.” 

Lacking Basic Protections 

Vishrut Iyengar, Senior Solutions Manager at Black Duck says because mobile devices increasingly function as both endpoints and development environments, they have become a primary vector for attackers. “Today, we are facing a concerning reality: many enterprise mobile apps still lack basic protections such as code obfuscation, secure storage, and updated third-party libraries. These weaknesses remain exploitable even in managed enterprise environments.  

“Security teams should no longer treat mobile as an isolated or secondary concern. Mobile apps must be tested continuously, on real devices, and incorporated into a broader application security strategy. This strategy should cover proprietary code, third-party SDKs, and open-source components to ensure complete risk coverage and application security without compromise.” 

Securing the Work Itself 

David Matalon, CEO at Venn, says that as more employees work remotely from home offices or while traveling, they’re not only using personal phones but also personal laptops, often over unsecured networks. The traditional perimeter is gone, and the Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) reality for remote workers requires a shift in strategy: from securing the device to securing the work itself.  

“Today’s technology enables organizations to isolate and protect work from any personal use on the same computer, even if the network or device is compromised. It’s time to stop asking ‘if’ work data and apps will be exposed on a personal device, and start planning for when it happens.” 

Strong Encryption, Automated Patch Management 

Darren Guccione, CEO and Co-Founder at Keeper Security adds that for mobile devices, deploying real-time mobile threat detection and ensuring devices and applications are updated with the latest security patches, can proactively defend against threats. “Strong encryption and automated patch management can further protect devices. MDM solutions that enforce compliance and restrict data access based on device health ensure a well-rounded mobile security strategy that goes beyond relying on OS updates alone.” 

Kirsten Doyle
Kirsten Doyle
Information Security Buzz News Editor

Kirsten Doyle has been in the technology journalism and editing space for nearly 24 years, during which time she has developed a great love for all aspects of technology, as well as words themselves. Her experience spans B2B tech, with a lot of focus on cybersecurity, cloud, enterprise, digital transformation, and data centre. Her specialties are in news, thought leadership, features, white papers, and PR writing, and she is an experienced editor for both print and online publications.

  • Kirsten Doyle
    AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals
  • Kirsten Doyle
    ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day
  • Kirsten Doyle
    SIG report: AI-generated code is linked to twice the security risk and rising technical debt
  • Kirsten Doyle
    Miasma worm spreads from Red Hat packages to Microsoft repositories

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

UK Solicitor Investigated After Uploading Client Files to ChatGPT

February 27, 20263 Mins Read

AI Theater, Real Risk: What Moltbook Reveals About API Security

February 27, 20265 Mins Read

APIs Under Siege: Wallarm Report Reveals How AI Is Supercharging Modern Cyberattacks

February 18, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}