Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Study & Research - 23% Of Organisations Don’t Run Security Checks On Products
Study & Research

23% Of Organisations Don’t Run Security Checks On Products

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamApril 17, 20192 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Ransom Deadline Given By LockBit in Port of Lisbon Attack
Ransom Deadline Given By LockBit in Port of Lisbon Attack
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

New survey data reveals a third of organisations have shipped products with known security vulnerabilities to beat competition 

 With vulnerabilities recently being disclosed in Huawei and Asus laptops, which have highlighted the importance of vendors carrying out thorough security checks on technology before shipping to customers, a new study from Outpost24, an innovator in identifying and managing cyber security exposure, has revealed that 23 percent of organisations don’t carry out any security testing at all on products before they are launched into the market. 

The study, which was carried out in March 2019 at the RSA Conference in San Francisco, also shockingly revealed that 31 percent of IT security professionals have admitted that their organisation has marketed a product, which they knew contained security vulnerabilities so they could beat competition.  

Other findings from the study revealed that 21 percent were not sure if their organisation carried out security testing on products before going to market, while only 56 percent of respondents claimed that their organisation did.  

“These figures raise concerns about the priority that organizations are placing on security, especially when attempting to beat competition by rushing products to market”, said Bob Egner, VP of Outpost24. “What many of the respondents are clearly forgetting is the damage security vulnerabilities can not only do to an organisation’s customers, but also to brand and reputation. If a company ships products which are notoriously flawed with security vulnerabilities then they will not keep their customers for long and may ultimately face legal issues.  The value of beating competition can be lost or even reversed.” 

Survey respondents were also asked about when security was added into the development stages of products, and this revealed that only 56 percent of organisations add security into the product development cycle at the very beginning, while 29 percent said they add it in the middle and 15 percent said they do it at the end. 

“Any organisations that is developing and marketing products should look to build security into the design stage, as the cost to correct them is documented to be smaller at an early stage of the development process. Taking a secure by design approach will mean security is built into the foundations of a product and will limit the cyber risks faced by users, which will ultimately increase customer satisfaction as well,” continued Egner. 

 

 

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Roundcube RCE Vulnerability Disclosed Early Amid Active Exploitation

June 10, 20255 Mins Read

Fake Indian Government Portal Used to Spread Cross-Platform Malware in Suspected APT36 Campaign

May 13, 20253 Mins Read

New Federal Alert Warns U.S. Businesses of Medusa Ransomware Surge

March 13, 20254 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}