Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Don’t Drop Your Guard: Defense Should Not End At The Data Center Perimeter
Articles

Don’t Drop Your Guard: Defense Should Not End At The Data Center Perimeter

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamOctober 2, 2017Updated:July 4, 20244 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
cloud-security
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Modern organizations have employees on the move all the time, visiting customers and checking in from devices of all types. Yet why do organizations still treat critical data as if it is always in a secure data center network? Cisco reports that by 2018, 76% of all data center traffic will come from the cloud.

In traditional data center security, the focus has been on keeping data physically isolated via the perimeter or “demilitarized zone” (the DMZ). Yet today’s security strategies focus too much on protecting the outside, with little to no security features inside the network.  As companies adopt mobile and cloud technologies, the perimeter is becoming increasingly difficult to enforce. The reality today is that modern networks are complex and distributed.  Vital enterprise data is moving outside of the protected data center and the IT silo.

Cloud providers do offer firewalls, edge protection, isolation, and hypervisor rules, yet service providers write in service-level agreements (SLAs) that the ultimate responsibility for security lies with the cloud users.

Expanding supply and distribution chains, launching customer engagement initiatives, and migrating to the cloud increase attack surfaces far beyond the span of control of the organization. As more mission-critical systems and operations move to the hyper-cloud model, leadership has to focus on new ways to secure critical data in any location.

Defense shouldn’t end at the data center perimeter, but extend through the network to include each individual application. All networks are too valuable to be secured only at the edge. Savvy organizations are building security into every aspect of application architecture.

In October 2015, more than 15 million United States citizens had their Social Security numbers exposed at Experion when they applied for financing from wireless provider T-Mobile USA. The breach lasted for two years from Sept. 1, 2013 to Sept. 16, 2015.

The most frightening part of recent breaches has been how long teams take to detect malicious network activity. In Sony’s case it was never detected; the hackers posted threatening messages and leaked corporate data directly. According to a report from the Ponemon Institute, it takes IT and IT security teams an average of 98 days for financial services companies to detect intrusion on their networks. In the retail sector, it takes IT and IT security teams an average of 197 days.

By assuming the internal network is just as dangerous as public internet, organizations of all sizes can easily rethink how to secure critical data.

Google launched its “BeyondCorp” initiative in 2015 to secure corporate applications by treating them all as if they are on the public internet.  In doing so, Google is doing for Google what security experts have been advising for years: delivering application and data security regardless of network context.

“Virtually every company today uses firewalls to enforce perimeter security,” reads a December 2014 Google white paper. “However, this security model is problematic because, when that perimeter is breached, an attacker has relatively easy access to a company’s privileged intranet. As companies adopt mobile and cloud technologies, the perimeter is becoming increasingly difficult to enforce.”

By adding network segmentation at the application level, most applications (the set of servers that perform a business function) in a data center can be made “invisible” to each other (from a network perspective). Furthermore, enterprise applications hardly need to directly communicate with each other, and if they do, it is via well known junctures. Considering most servers within an enterprise application do not need direct links to each other either, most application servers should be invisible to each other as well.

Application-centric network security, using micro-segmentation, can achieve greater security and granular control by making cloud or data center resources invisible and undetectable to each other. Monitored access, encryption, and application-specific firewall rules can all but eliminate malicious “east/west” movement inside a network.

Adding layers of defense in depth for each enterprise application inside your network, means each application owner can dictate how traffic flows to each application and better monitor and isolate traffic to prevent unauthorized access. Even with only basic interior firewall rules, a modern enterprise can protect themselves from a Sony-style data disaster.

When IT teams control their cloud networks at the application layer, performance becomes less of an issue, and teams can match security policies to the use case at hand. Each IT team can create a secure, scalable, meshed network across multiple data centers, partners, and cloud regions to create one logical network of federated resources for their application.

In the future, Enterprises have to get serious about protecting themselves from inside exploitation by hackers, criminal gangs, and governments. Attacks and costs are growing.

[su_box title=”About Patrick Kerpan” style=”noise” box_color=”#336588″][short_info id=’103445′ desc=”true” all=”false”][/su_box]

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Visual data is the blind spot in enterprise security: that’s about to change

May 4, 20267 Mins Read

Making stolen data worthless: why security must start with the data

March 30, 20265 Mins Read

Meta’s Smart Glasses Privacy Scandal Expands After Sama Credentials Found on the Dark Web

March 10, 20264 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}