Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Why The Public Sector Needs To Address Its Cyber Debt
Articles

Why The Public Sector Needs To Address Its Cyber Debt

Daniel LattimerBy Daniel LattimerSeptember 30, 2022Updated:December 9, 20224 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Since the start of the pandemic, the term hybrid working has gone from a buzzword, to a way of life. This change has seen the demand for online services, especially citizen services, become higher than ever. Given the public sector’s reputation as a slow-moving industry, it’s no surprise it has a lot of catching up to do to reach this demand.

Positively, though, the UK government unveiled its long-awaited strategy earlier this year to improve digital public services. The Digital, Data and Technology (DDaT) capability framework was the latest in a set of policies aimed at making the UK ‘digital by default’.  Aiming to harness ‘digital to build and deliver services’, is this framework the turning point the industry needs to move forward digitally?

Modernising to catch up

Legacy systems are rife in the UK public sector. Most, due to their age and design, lack both interoperability and scalability, making it difficult for them to manage workloads. With these struggles existing pre-Covid, the impact of the pandemic put even greater pressure on service continuity, with organisations compelled to quickly create hybrid working solutions as the nation went into lockdown.

Positively, departments in the public sector adapted quickly to these new ways of working. Many did so more smoothly than expected, displaying agility and resilience. This shift was enabled by the use of technology, with services, for example, swiftly moved to the cloud in accordance with general government strategy.

The policies laid out by the UK government are a positive step in the move by the public sector to improving digital citizen services. However, while many organisations have pushed ahead with adopting these new digital models, many haven’t given cybersecurity the same priority as digital improvement. As a result, security flaws have appeared, leaving systems exposed and potentially vulnerable to attack.

The ramifications of a cyber attack on the public sector are potentially huge. Prevention is key, especially with implications such as downed healthcare services – which happened as a result of the WannaCry ransomware – or the compromise of other public services, such as councils, law enforcement, or education.

While the public sector has already seen the transformational power of applying the right DDaT strategies, their use has highlighted a number of systemic flaws. For example, when security is not incorporated from the beginning of a project, cyber debt results. This is usually due to the investments which are made to promote operations and growth having outrun the security measures which should have been in place, meaning organisations have to continually catch up. Such issues are prevented by doing things correctly the first time and ensuring that, when implementing new systems, security is constantly being taken into consideration.

The cyber arms race

There is an arms race in cybersecurity. Organisations and their opponents – threat actors – are fighting against each other with the aim of coming out on top. Threat actors are driven, quick, and technologically advanced, and cyber attacks are becoming more sophisticated, with the ability to cause significant damage to the networks, data, and services the country depends on. As a result the threat landscape is continuously evolving and changing.

Attackers use methods which work, and usually try to breach organisations by looking for flaws in privileged accounts. In fact, according to Forrester research, privileged access abuse accounts for 80% of breaches.

There are typically four steps involved in breaches. An attacker will initially try to get access to privileged identities without authorisation. Once this has been established, they will travel laterally and vertically through the network looking for high-value targets. Then they move to utilising privileges at a higher level to accomplish what they are there for, which could be data theft, intellectual property theft, or service interruption.

The future of digital innovation

It has become clear that cutting-edge technologies have been key to the change we have, and are, witnessing at all levels of the public sector industry. But, while the race to protect against malicious actors continues,  vigilance must be at the forefront of digital innovation within the public sector.

Cybersecurity must be a primary component of every significant IT or digital programme, and from the start too. If transformation is to be beneficial in the long term, and public services are to continue running safely for the general public, cyber debt needs to be reconciled.

Daniel Lattimer

Daniel Lattimer, Director Government & Defence, EMEA at CyberArk

    The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

    Related Posts

    The Real Cost of Inconsistent Third-Party Access

    December 18, 20255 Mins Read

    What Happens When Devices Cross Borders? The Role of Geofencing in Global IT

    August 7, 20256 Mins Read

    The Evolving Importance of Identity Governance in FinTech

    July 10, 20258 Mins Read
    ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

    No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

     
    ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
    Black ISB Logo

    Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

    X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

    Working With Us

    • About Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    Write For Us

    • How To Contribute

    The Pages

    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • AI Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Copyright Notice

    Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Manage Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}