Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Attacks - Hackers Target Global Sporting Events with Fake Domains to Steal Logins
Attacks Latest News Malware News & Analysis Phishing

Hackers Target Global Sporting Events with Fake Domains to Steal Logins

Josh Breaker RolfeBy Josh Breaker RolfeDecember 13, 20243 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Sporting Events
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

New research from Palo Alto Networks has revealed that cybercriminals are taking advantage of high-profile sporting events to conduct scams, phishing, and malware attacks through suspicious domain registrations and other malicious activities.

Domain Abuse Surges During Paris Olympics

For example, researchers uncovered significant spikes in newly registered domains (NRDs), DNS anomalies, and URL traffic during the Paris Olympics. During the event, Olympic-related domain registrations tripled compared to normal periods. 16% of these domains were suspicious, 13 times higher than the general rate for NRDs.

Attackers used these spoof domains to sell fake tickets, trick users into participating in cryptocurrency scams, steal personal information, or install malware on victim computers.

How Consumers Can Identify Event-Related Scams

According to Anne Cutler, a Cybersecurity Expert at Keeper Security, scammers often exploit events for personal gain, so extra vigilance is essential during these periods. However, these spoof websites are becoming harder to detect.

“Threat actors are getting more adept at SEO poisoning, using language like ‘Official Website’ to lure people into clicking a dangerous link or visiting a spoofed site that can harvest sensitive information or download malware onto your devices,” she said.

To detect a scam website, Cutler suggests paying special attention to the URL and domain extension. While scammers no longer use obviously suspicious URLs and are instead opting for commonly used top-level domains (TLDs) like .com, .shop, or .store, they will still differ slightly from official websites.

“If [a URL] appears to be abnormally long or unrecognizable based on your normal search activity, it’s best to ignore it – and not click on the link.  Instead of searching, you can type in the full URL directly to ensure you’re landing on the authentic website. If you do land on a spoofed website, it may ask you to give your email address or other personal information, so be cautious when entering any information,” she said.

Cutler also notes that consumers can use a password manager or tools like a Google Transparency Report to reduce the risk of visiting fake websites. If a website’s URL doesn’t match what’s stored in a user’s secure digital vault, the password manager will not fill in the credentials, indicating it’s a spoofed site.

Recommendations for the Security Industry

In light of these threats, Palo Alto Networks suggests that organizations proactively monitor domain registration trends, DNS traffic, and suspicious URLs, while security teams should use advanced tools like DNS Security to mitigate risks.

Ultimately, these findings underscore the importance of increased cybersecurity measures around high-profile events.

Josh Breaker Rolfe

Josh is a Content writer at Bora. He graduated with a degree in Journalism in 2021 and has a background in cybersecurity PR. He's written on a wide range of topics, from AI to Zero Trust, and is particularly interested in the impacts of cybersecurity on the wider economy.

  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Thales Data Threat Report: AI and Cloud Complexity Fuel New Data Security Risks
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    50+ Organizations Breached Due to Missing MFA
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Red Hat OpenShift AI Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Seize Infrastructure Control

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Dutch police, NCSC take down major botnet

June 4, 20264 Mins Read

CrowdStrike, Google, and Shadowserver Foundation disrupt Glassworm botnet

June 1, 20265 Mins Read

Threat Actors Deploy Tiflux RMM for Persistent Remote Access

May 29, 20263 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}