Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - API Security - Agentic AI Systems Pose Alarming API Security Risks
API Security Artificial Intelligence Latest News News & Analysis Security Study & Research

Agentic AI Systems Pose Alarming API Security Risks

Josh Breaker RolfeBy Josh Breaker RolfeApril 29, 20253 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Agentic AI Systems Pose API Sec Risks
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

AI-related API vulnerabilities have increased by 1025% year over year, underscoring the escalating risks associated with autonomous agentic AI systems.  

Wallarm’s ThreatStats report for Q1 2025, titled “The Rise of Agentic AI,” highlights that evolving API threats are fueled by the rise of agentic AI systems, growing complexity in cloud-native infrastructure, and a surge in software supply chain risks.  

“In the first quarter of 2025, overall API threats continued to increase across multiple industries, from healthcare to AI and beyond,” said Ivan Novikov, CEO and Co-Founder of Wallarm. “Our research shows that AI agent security risk largely stems from APIs.”  

Agentic AI Exacerbates Familiar Security Risks 

Wallarm’s analysis of 2869 agentic AI security issues on GitHub revealed that 65% were API-related, reflecting the intrinsic link between agentic AI security and API security.  

The Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) data reflects similar patterns. While the most frequent security issue is the use of Unmaintained Third-Party Components (CWE-937)—a common software weakness—the second and third places were Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) and Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400), both of which are associated with API vulnerabilities.  

Misconfigurations Dominate API Breaches 

The report also reviews the most significant API-related breaches from Q1 2025, highlighting ongoing issues with misconfigurations and insufficient access control. The top five incidents were:  

  • Oracle Cloud: An attack exploiting an unpatched CVE-2021-35587 vulnerability exposed 6 million records, demonstrating the long-term risks of legacy systems. 
  • Deepseek: Missing authentication resulted in the exposure of over 1 million records.  
  • Common Crawl: A public dataset used to train large language models contained 11,908 live API secrets, exposing the widespread risks in the software supply chain.  
  • Volkswagen: Weak JSON Web Token (JWT) implementations led to a breach exposing 800,000 records.  
  • NHS UK: An unauthenticated API endpoint exposed extensive patient data, highlighting vulnerabilities in healthcare sector infrastructure.  

According to Wallarm, breaches tied to misconfiguration, hardcoded secrets, and unauthenticated API access dominated the quarter, with AI and healthcare organizations disproportionately affected.  

Access Control Failures are a Growing Concern 

Wallarm’s analysis also found that three major agentic AI vulnerabilities – CWE-285 (Improper Authorization), CWE-284 (Improper Access Control), and CWE-287 (Improper Authentication) – were directly related to access control flaws. In total, 209 CVEs recorded during the quarter fell into the Broken Access Control category, making it the largest in Wallarm’s vulnerability dataset.  

Recommendations 

In response to these findings, Wallarm recommends implementing:  

Threat Management:  

  • Integrating API-specific threat intelligence.  
  • Refreshing API threat models quarterly.  

Real-Time Protection: 

  • Monitoring API traffic and blocking anomalies in real time.  
  • Prioritizing investment in API security tools and training, particularly for real-time defense, secret scanning, and schema validation.  

Agentic AI Security:  

  • Expanding API discovery to include agentic AI endpoints.  
  • Implementing dedicated agentic AI security strategies, including stricter access controls and operational guardrails.  
Josh Breaker Rolfe

Josh is a Content writer at Bora. He graduated with a degree in Journalism in 2021 and has a background in cybersecurity PR. He's written on a wide range of topics, from AI to Zero Trust, and is particularly interested in the impacts of cybersecurity on the wider economy.

  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Thales Data Threat Report: AI and Cloud Complexity Fuel New Data Security Risks
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    50+ Organizations Breached Due to Missing MFA
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    What Happens after a Phishing Email Lands in Your Inbox?
  • Josh Breaker Rolfe
    Red Hat OpenShift AI Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Seize Infrastructure Control

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

UK Solicitor Investigated After Uploading Client Files to ChatGPT

February 27, 20263 Mins Read

AI Theater, Real Risk: What Moltbook Reveals About API Security

February 27, 20265 Mins Read

APIs Under Siege: Wallarm Report Reveals How AI Is Supercharging Modern Cyberattacks

February 18, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}