Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Don’t Be The Weakest Link: Protecting Your Supply Chain From Targeted Malware Attacks
Articles

Don’t Be The Weakest Link: Protecting Your Supply Chain From Targeted Malware Attacks

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamAugust 28, 20165 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Every senior manager knows that falling prey to a malware attack could yield catastrophic results. But what if that malware spread beyond your own systems, taking your partners, customers and supply chain down with you?

Cybercriminals have been busy over the past year, carrying out an alarming number of malware attacks varying the payload from types that enable access to confidential client or personnel data to a recent wave of ransomware attacks. Yet despite a growing awareness, these attacks continue to be successful. With file-based attacks accounting for 94 per cent of successful data breaches, a growing number of organisations have admitted that they are helpless to prevent future attacks. The answer, so far, has been to focus instead on detecting and responding to malware after it has already made its way onto the organisation’s system. At the same time, an equally important concern is beginning to gain the attention of those managing the security of their organisation’s reputation.

Security surrounding outbound emails is becoming a higher priority for IT professionals, as the fear of infecting a business partner, supplier or customer via corrupted attachments is becoming a reality, especially in organisations like law firms, who employ Lawyers and Partners that send and receive hundreds of emails and file attachments to and from their clients each day. Needless to say, any organisation implicated in the unwitting spread of harmful malware could face irreparable damage to its reputation, inevitably losing the trust of important clients and partners and feeling the consequential damage to profits.

The amount of goodwill that can be lost shouldn’t come as a shock, considering the potential cost of suffering a data breach:

High-profile incidences in recent years have led to a shake up of Regulation which will introduce steeper fines and even publicly name companies who suffer data breaches.  Growing concern from increasingly cyber aware consumers have all created a heightened sense of caution for companies in all sectors. As a result, any organisation suspected to be unknowingly sending malware to its partners and clients will have difficulty in maintaining any sort of relationship, or at best be in a weaker position commercially.

Finding a clear answer

In response to these concerns, many organisations are turning to digital signatures to authenticate document origins, and encryption as a means of securing their email communications. While these security methods offer some solace, by protecting the contents of a message from being intercepted and accessed by an unknown third-party, relying too heavily on encryption and digital signatures provides less than perceived protection should the endpoint generating the document become compromised at any point.

In this case, all that encryption will accomplish is securely delivering an infected file – which could potentially have even greater ramifications from the recipient if their system were to become infected. With hackers becoming increasingly adept at operating unseen, through a combination of advanced, timed embedded malicious code and highly-targeted social engineering, an increasing number of organisations are becoming unwitting accomplices in the spread of malware, regardless of how confident they are in their inbound and outbound security solutions.

With this in mind, the validation and integrity of outbound files should be a main objective for ensuring trust and security of any organisation. Any business process that requires encryption or digital signatures applied to files, must ensure they are validated, their integrity guaranteed, and then signed in order to ensure any risk of spreading malware is nullified.

In order to be seen as trustworthy by clients, organisations must be able to ensure their clients that only clean versions of original files to leave – and enter – their systems.

 The uncompromised solution

 Available to the market are innovative technologies take a brand new approach to ensuring the validity of outbound files – whether they be PDFs, Word, PowerPoint or Excel files.

Typically, these solutions makes no assumption about the integrity of outbound files. Instead of simply encrypting files before they are sent, they either create an image based replica or regenerate a brand new version of the original that is guaranteed to be free of any malicious code in real time.  Being email security platforms, these solutions need to be as near wire speed as possible, whilst breaking each file down to byte-level, so it can be fully analysed and rebuilt with only code that is known to be safe.  This is cutting edge technology, that organisations are actually finding works, allaying their general mistrust of cyber security solutions being effective.

This new and innovative approach runs contrary to legacy cybersecurity solutions, which instead look only for elements that are known to be malicious, or have a signature to block anything bad. The benefit of the “known good” approach is that it doesn’t need to rely on constant updates, which would typically need to be released each time a new macro or other exploit is discovered.

By implementing a different solution as part of a layered security approach to supplement conventional encryption and digital signatures, organisations can be assured any file they are sending to a client or partner is not just protected, but more importantly, uncompromised.

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Visual data is the blind spot in enterprise security: that’s about to change

May 4, 20267 Mins Read

Making stolen data worthless: why security must start with the data

March 30, 20265 Mins Read

Meta’s Smart Glasses Privacy Scandal Expands After Sama Credentials Found on the Dark Web

March 10, 20264 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}