Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Shadow IT And The Challenge Of Controlling The Cloud
Articles

Shadow IT And The Challenge Of Controlling The Cloud

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamNovember 30, 2016Updated:July 4, 20244 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
cloud-security
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

“Shadow IT” sounds like something you might see in a thriller starring Matt Damon, but it’s a clear and present danger for IT pros. It refers to the practice of people throughout a company setting up their own IT services without consulting with the IT department. It’s easy to do, thanks to the “consumerization of IT” trend and the availability of cheap or free cloud-based SaaS services from the likes of Dropbox, Google’s G Suite (formerly known as Google Apps), Microsoft Office 365, and Slack.

The result: Your company is probably using dozens of cloud services, if not hundreds, that you have no knowledge of nor control over.

Despite the obvious benefits many of these services bring, the lack of visibility and control is a problem. Not only does it reduce the CIO’s ability to manage the technology that’s actually in use at her or his company, but it also creates a very real security risk. You can’t protect what you don’t even know exists. And it’s too much to expect non-IT staff to implement security policies, encrypt their data, avoid sharing sensitive information, or even use decent passwords for the cloud services they sign up for.

As a result, unofficial cloud services become a portal for hackers. In fact, Gartner predicts that one third of security breaches by 2020 will come in through shadow IT services. Compounding the security risks, are a wide range of legal and compliance issues that accompany unauthorized cloud services sending on a company’s behalf. CAN-SPAM violation, content and data exposure, the list goes on.

How widespread is the problem? A recent Cisco study suggests most companies have  15 to 22 times more cloud apps in service than IT has authorized. Let that sink in for a minute: For every cloud app you know about, there are between 15 and 22 others that are in use but which you don’t know about yet.

Cisco’s survey might sound extreme, but other studies agree about the severity of the problem. A recent SpiceWorks survey reports that 80 percent of IT managers say their users are setting up unauthorized services. And according to the Cloud Security Alliance and Skyhigh Networks, only 8 percent of organizations believe they’ve got a handle on all the cloud services their employees use.

So what to do? In an era of bring-your-own-device policies and open Internet access, you can’t just lock down your employees’ devices the way you could have a couple decades ago. And sending increasingly irate memos or posting policies to the company intranet are not going to increase compliance, human nature being what it is.

There is a choke point available to CIOs, however, and that’s email. The vast majority of  cloud services that employees set up will, at some point, need to send email on behalf of your organization.

Naturally, those services use their own mail servers, which you don’t control. But if your company has implemented email authentication, you do have the ability to permit or deny those emails being delivered. Using the open DMARC standard, companies can specify a list of servers that are authorized to send email on behalf of the company. Servers that attempt to use the company’s domain name but aren’t on the authorized list will find that their email is flagged or deleted by DMARC-compliant receivers. And more 2.7 billion consumer inboxes globally (about 80% of US inboxes) are DMARC-compliant.

What’s more, DMARC includes a reporting function, so those rejected messages will not only fail to get through, they’ll show up on a log of DMARC authorization failures. IT staff can use those logs to identify services that are attempting to send mail on the organization’s behalf.

With email authentication in place, the job of securing shadow IT becomes much simpler. All the CIO needs to do is send a message to employees telling them that they are welcome to set up cloud services—but if they want to enable email functions with those services, they’ll need to talk to the IT department about it. Until they come forward and make their case, any email from the cloud services they set up will fail to authenticate, and the IT department will be aware of it via DMARC reports.

This won’t eliminate every shadow IT service, of course—just the ones that rely on email using a domain controlled by your company. But that’s enough to give CIOs control over a vast swathe of SaaS services, and it gives them leverage without banning those services outright. That’s a win-win for both IT professionals and the organizations they serve.

[su_box title=”About Alexander Garcia-Tobar” style=”noise” box_color=”#336588″][short_info id=’98337′ desc=”true” all=”false”][/su_box]

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Tenable warns AI adoption is outpacing governance as cloud exposure risks surge

May 15, 20264 Mins Read

Cloud Security Controls Explained: A Definitive Guide

March 19, 20269 Mins Read

The Real Cost of Inconsistent Third-Party Access

December 18, 20255 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}