Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Back To Basics: How Simple Techniques Can Thwart Complex APT Attacks
Articles

Back To Basics: How Simple Techniques Can Thwart Complex APT Attacks

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamAugust 12, 2016Updated:July 4, 20245 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Professor Avishai Wool, CTO and Co-Founder of AlgoSec, discusses how organizations’ basic network structure can help or hinder APT attacks.

Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) are among the most insidious cyberattacks faced by businesses today. We’ve all heard of the Stuxnet worm, and other high-profile attacks including the 2014 Sony Pictures Entertainment hack, described by one observer as ‘the perfect APT’, and 2015’s Carbanak attack, which specifically targets financial institutions.

Will an APT affect your business? Well, ISACA’s 2015 Advanced Persistent Threat Awareness Study found that 74% of respondents believe that they will be targeted by an APT, and 28% had already been attacked.  The trouble is, APTs are, by nature, hugely sophisticated. They’re designed to be stealthy and evade detection, enabling them to spread undetected across networks over weeks or even months.

It might seem that mitigating the risk of an APT means deploying highly sophisticated cyber security measures, out of reach of most ordinary organizations.  Not so. In fact, you can go a long way towards mitigating the risk of an APT by going back to basics: understanding the fundamentals of how such an attack is planned and deployed, and how your organization’s network structure can help or hinder such an attack.  Understanding, in short, how to reduce the attack surface you have available to malicious hackers.

 Understanding APT structures

However sophisticated they are, all APT attacks typically follow a similar path:

  1. Reconnaissance. An information-gathering stag where attackers will typically will use a variety of techniques to gain an intelligent picture of what a business’s network actually looks like in order to establish what security policies and applications are already in place, or identify remote access capabilities that could provide them with access points.
  • Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) which involves scanning externally open services for vulnerabilities
  • Human Source Intelligence (HUSINT ) which involves targeting key employees for access information
  • Foot printing which involves identifying which versions of software or resources an organization is using, and creating a profile of its network infrastructure through techniques such as banner grabs, SNMP sweeps and zone transfers.
  1. Exploit delivery.Once an appropriate access point for targeting your network has been identified, the attackers deliver a malicious tool or application that enables them to penetrate your network. Chosen attack vectors can include email attachments, so-called ‘water-hole’ attacks, where the attackers compromise an existing website they know a target is likely to visit, or even physical delivery of the exploit on an infected USB stick.
  1. Exploration and lateral expansion.Having succeeded in getting inside your network, the attackers’ next aim is to move laterally within your network,to ultimately get to your valuable business data. But this data is usually on another computer system, so the attacker needs to find a path to it. This lateral movement is where an APT’s persistency comes in. Exploration takes time – time during which individual users may reboot their systems, change their security signatures and otherwise make it difficult for the attacker to re-access their machines. Therefore, attackers ideally aim to deploy software directly onto individual machines that will allow them to come back whenever they need to, even if the user has rebooted or patched it.  The most common way to do this is via Remote Administrator Tools (RATs) – the same type of tools that are used for remote troubleshooting or helpdesk functions.  The installation of a RAT gives attackers a backdoor to revisit compromised machines whenever they need to.
  1. Exfiltration.Finally the attackers extract the valuable information they’ve been seeking, perhaps by blending it into benign traffic over HTTP, or encrypting it in ways that make it difficult to spot, such as over HTTPS.

Reducing your network attack surface

 Whilst it is very difficult to prevent attackers from carrying out the first stage in their APT journey – after all, there’s nothing particularly secretive about many OSINT scanning techniques – it is possible to prevent them from laterally moving across your network in search of your valuable data, with some back-to-basics principles:

  1. Segment your network. Break up your flat internal network into multiple zones, based on the use pattern and category of data processed within each zone. This segmentation then prevents the APT from jumping from one ‘stepping stone’ machine to another.

 

  1. Place firewalls to filter traffic between those zones. ‘Choke points’ – i.e. firewalls – must be placed between the zones to filter the traffic entering and exiting. In other words, firewalls must be placed on internal, lateral traffic paths, not just your network perimeter.

 

  1. Write restrictive security policies for those firewalls to enforce. Gartner Research has suggested that 99% of firewall breaches are caused by firewall misconfigurations, not firewall flaws. The message is clear – your firewalls absolutely must be configured accurately and intelligently, to analyze and block the kind of internal communications that signal APTs.

When you design your network’s segmentation, consider these two zone types that all networks should be split into. First, identify and define sensitive data zones that encompass systems handling and storing payment and credit card details, employee records, company financials, intellectual property, and regulated data. Second, identify and define human user zones that contain human-accessible desktops, laptops, tablets and smartphones. You are probably already segmenting wireless-access zones, but wired-access desktops should also be segregated. Since an APT’s first point of attack is normally such a desktop, this segmentation then prevents the APT’s lateral movement.

If this sounds remarkably simple, that’s because it is.  The important point to bear in mind is that no matter how sophisticated an APT is, it’s operating on your turf. Discovering the signs of an APT inside your network can be challenging, but with intelligent use of security basics, you will go a long way to preventing lateral exploration – and in turn stop the APT in its tracks.

[su_box title=”About Avishai Wool” style=”noise” box_color=”#336588″][short_info id=’60697′ desc=”true” all=”false”][/su_box]

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Exploited Faster, Patched Slower: Verizon DBIR 2026 Shows Security Teams Losing Ground

May 20, 20265 Mins Read

Security’s Blind Spot: The Threats Hiding in “Low-Severity” Alerts

May 6, 20265 Mins Read

Why OSINT deserves the same status as other intelligence disciplines

March 17, 20266 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}