Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Breaking Through At AppSecUSA 2016
Articles

Breaking Through At AppSecUSA 2016

Brian A. McHenryBy Brian A. McHenryNovember 23, 2016Updated:May 2, 20255 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Recently, I attended AppSecUSA, which was held in Washington, DC from October 11th through the 14th. I last attended AppSecUSA in 2013 in New York City, and was fortunate enough to participate in Web Application Defenders’ training led by Ryan Barnett. Each year, the talks and training improve dramatically for OWASP’s biggest meeting here in the United States. With that in mind, it was quite a surprise to have my CFP submission accepted for a 15-minute lightning talk.

This article is less about AppSecUSA and more about my experience submitting to Calls for Papers at the myriad infosec cons that litter the calendar each year. But first, allow me to reiterate: AppSecUSA boasts one of the most diverse groups of attendees among all the conferences I’ve attended. The emphasis on the application layer means there are as many developers as there are folks with “security” somewhere in their job title. The hallway conversations tend to be of a distinct other tone and depth. Many seeking to learn from each other in developing and deploying more secure applications. The talks are more often focused on new ways of improving security process and procedure than they are focused on the latest exploit.

When I tweeted the acceptance of my talk to AppSecUSA 2016, there were quite a few who asked how I got accepted. Many other folks have written (and tweeted) extensively about how to get a talk accepted, but I’ve seen few catalog their own experience. My first submission was back in 2011, to the RSA conference, which puts the journey to a 15-minute slot at AppSecUSA this year at about 5 years.

lego

    (Caption: Lego mini-figure of each AppSecUSA 2016 speaker provided by Sonatype.)

Step 1:

Find conferences you’re interested in, and submit your proposed talk on time. This step seems obvious, but I know too many people who gave up after being rejected or thought their idea would never get accepted. Your idea is a good one, it just needs some help and good luck.

Step 2:

Engage the community you want to accept your talk. In the case of AppSecUSA, attend local chapter meetings of OWASP. See what talks are being delivered at those meetings. For organizations like OWASP and ISSA, there are always projects that need help. Getting engaged is fuel for making your idea better and learning to shape it into something CFP reviewers see as a good fit for their audience.

Step 3:

Document your ideas publicly. Hiding all your deep thoughts on security away on your laptop doesn’t help anyone. Maybe your company has a blog or community site you can contribute to, or you can join me in having a personal blog that’s rarely updated. By first trialing some ideas on my own blog, I was able to work up the courage to write for F5’s community site. A few posts there opened the door to writing for Information Security Buzz.

Writing and sharing regularly builds a body of work that CFP reviewers can easily reference for some idea of the quality of your work. The CFP forms often don’t leave a lot of room for elaborate descriptions of your idea and content. Regular writing also helps to shape your ideas and further engages you with the community. It’s also OK to write something and later find out that you were wrong in some detail or other. People are kinder than you think.

Step 4:

Find someone who will listen to your talk. Even if that someone is your dog, cat, or goldfish. Your idea has now been growing for a while by attending chapter meetings, other infosec conferences, and regularly writing and publishing, but it helps to practice and improve your presentation skills. Toastmasters is one way to work on this and practice. You may find that the local chapter meetings of OWASP, ISSA, or other security professionals’ organization have opened the opportunity to give a short talk there.

Step 5 (optional):

Run your own conference. In January 2016, the first-ever Security BSides NYC happened. After a few years of starts and stops, I and several other intrepid souls finally got the first edition off the ground. Seeing what goes into a relatively small conference enhanced my confidence and empathy for conference organizers and CFP reviewers. It’s hard work getting quality submissions and picking the best of those submissions, not to mention all the other logistics involved. (And yes, the BSidesNYC 2017 is very much in the works.)

For me, the Death of WAF article published here turned into a talk idea for an OWASP NYC chapter meeting back in 2015. That talk was very fortunately recorded, and added to my referenceable body of work. Watching a recording of yourself is every bit as painful as it sounds, but it helps refine your delivery and content immensely. The 15-minute Lightning Talk accepted for AppSecUSA was entitled The Evolution of WAF, and was inspired by and refined from the prior article and talk.

Condensing and refining those ideas into a 15-minute talk was another challenge, but all the work leading up to that date left me more than prepared. I’m already working on some new ideas, and interested in where they take me and the first place those ideas will likely appear is in this space on Information Security Buzz.

See you on the road at one of the many conferences.

Brian_McHenry
Brian A. McHenry

As a Senior Security Solutions Architect at F5 Networks, Brian McHenry focuses on web application and network security. McHenry acts as a liaison between customers and F5 product teams, providing a hands-on, real-world perspective. He is a regular contributor on InformationSecurityBuzz.com, a co-founder of BSidesNYC, and a speaker at AppSecUSA, BC Aware Day, GoSec Montreal, and the Central Ohio Infosec Summit, among others. Prior to joining F5 in 2008, McHenry, a self-described IT generalist, held leadership positions within a variety of technology organizations, ranging from startups to major financial services firms.

  • Brian A. McHenry
    The WAF Is Not Enough
  • Brian A. McHenry
    Access Management, With A Side Order Of Identity
  • Brian A. McHenry
    The Internet of Thingbots
  • Brian A. McHenry
    Black Hat USA 2017: Bigger and Better (?)

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

What Are AI SOC Agents? Use Cases, Architecture, and the Leading Vendors

June 19, 20266 Mins Read

AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals

June 19, 20265 Mins Read

ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day

June 19, 20263 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}