Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Articles - Bubble-Ness Of Wrongs
Articles

Bubble-Ness Of Wrongs

Professor John WalkerBy Professor John WalkerJune 11, 2018Updated:December 30, 20214 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

I was slightly bemused when I saw the ex TalkTalk CEO was standing up at Infosecurity 2018 to give a presentation of Cyber Security – a presentation, I presume she was rewarded for. The first thing that passed through my mind was, Infosecurity is a security event, agreed very much focused on commercialized sales pitches, and wondered just how hearing how the TalkTalk debacle, and the post event PR disaster would help reinforce the Cyber Security mantra – but as a contact said to me, let’s see what the Baroness has to say.

Baroness Harding

As a refresher here to the case of TalkTalk in 2015, the Data Commissioner of the day Elizabeth Denham said:

“Talk Talk’s failure to implement the most basic cyber security measures allowed hackers to penetrate TalkTalk’s systems with ease.

According to a report in the Register, at Infosecurity 2018, Harding blamed the matter of Legacy apps and systems for the event – AKA stuff that is out of date (let us not mention that dead horse PCI-DSS please), and commented that it was SQL Injections that had played its part in the hack, exposing multiples of users to cyber fraud opportunities etc. However, what the Baroness did not say was (according to a reliable insider source of the day) the Board were made well aware of the security shortfalls around one year before the event actually took place, but as so many companies do, relied on the ‘it has not happened, so why pay to fix it’ – thus manifesting in the security issue the company encountered in 2015 which exposed 156,959 customers including their names, addresses, dates of birth, phone numbers and email addresses. In 15,656 cases, the attacker also had access to bank account details and sort codes. It is further rumored that TalkTalk recived a discount on the fine that was imposed on them – I guess to qualify that snippet a quick FOI would suffice.

It is also simply amazing that Harding declined to answer a question from the hall, and another submitted online about whether, and how the size of TalkTalk’s security budget and team changed in response to the breach. The Tory peer admitted TalkTalk “could have done more” (or just apply the basic stuff which was not in place) to prevent the attack and that the security budget did go up – without going into any detail whatsoever. However, I understand from my sourece that at the time this was not commensurate with the actual requirement. It may have also been an advised practice to have declined the request from the organizers, and of course the fee she was paid in consideration of digging up, what was, and is now current day dirty washing – not making anything better for the ex-company, but refreshing the mind of the observers, with not such a good commentary or position on Cyber Security.

This on top of last years honored individual who enter the hero category of Infosecurity – Marcus Hutchins, who is now under further investigation by the FBI. This leaving me wondering if Infosecurity Team do understand what the real mission here is – beyond the hype, PR, and underpinning the commercial interests of the vendors to sell more – which in several cases will become Shelfware!

But fear not, as we move forward I am guessing the Infosecurity Backroom Team will also be already planning next year’s event to present more such interesting topics at Infosecurity 2019 – maybe in 2019 we will see Paul Pester of TSB fame talking about system sustainability and responding to the need to provide real time support and continuity for the customer – only time will tell.

Professor John Walker

John is the Principle at Shadow-Intelligence (Si), partnering with PALISCOPE, BreachAware and iStorage. He is a Visiting Professor at the School of Science and Technology, Nottingham, Trent University (NTU) and holds the appointment of Editor in Chief for the International Journal of Cyber Forensics and Advanced Threat Investigations (CFATI). For the last decade he has delivered training courses in the Middle, and Far East to Commercial, Industrial, the Financial Services Sector, and Military Agencies, including the UAE, US, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia (KL), Singapore, Argentina, and Sao Paulo

He served in the Royal Air Force 22 years’, specialising in Counterintelligence, working with UK Agencies such as GCHQ/CESG, and others in the fields of SIGINT, COMINT and Satellite Communications, holding appointments such as System ITSO for a CIA SCIF.

In the commercials sectors of IT/Cyber he has worked for/with Logica, Bae, T5, GM, Experian, Betfair, Palace of Westminster, House of Lords/Commons, TSol (Treasury Solicitors) and provided Consultancy to the Saudi Arabian MOD, TRA (Telecommunications Authority (Dubai) and the Military Academy of Malaysia (KL) on SOC, CSIRT, Digital Forensics and OSINT. Within the last 5 years he has focused on Geopolitics, with global expertise around the UAE and Russia, Anti-Terrorist Operations (ATO), Cyber-Warfare, Dezinformatsiya (Disinformation) and Maskirovka (Military Deception).

  • Professor John Walker
    China Threat Recap: A Deeper Insight
  • Professor John Walker
    Missing The Point In The Current Age Of Cyber
  • Professor John Walker
    Part 1: Historic To 2022 – The APT And Logical Threats
  • Professor John Walker
    A Hairs Breadth

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The Real Cost of Inconsistent Third-Party Access

December 18, 20255 Mins Read

What Happens When Devices Cross Borders? The Role of Geofencing in Global IT

August 7, 20256 Mins Read

The Evolving Importance of Identity Governance in FinTech

July 10, 20258 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}