Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Study & Research - Can I Trust You? Online Fraud Boom Casts Doubt Over Brands’ Ability To Protect Consumers’ Digital Identities
Study & Research

Can I Trust You? Online Fraud Boom Casts Doubt Over Brands’ Ability To Protect Consumers’ Digital Identities

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamMay 19, 20224 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Handcuffs frame the word 'fraud' among newspaper cuttings
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Research from Onfido demonstrates the emotional cost of fraud is a breakdown of trust between consumers and brands

Onfido, the leading global digital identity verification and authentication provider, today announces the results of a study revealing the emotional impact of fraud on UK consumers and how this is fostering distrust of brands responsible for keeping customers’ online identities safe.

With the rate of identity fraud rocketing 44% since 2019 as fraudsters follow consumers online, 53% of UK consumers agree that they now fear their identity is available for purchase, while almost half (47%) agree that online service providers and platforms do not prioritise anti-fraud measures. As a result, half (50%) of consumers agree that they now distrust brands or online service providers with protecting their identity.

The emotional cost of fraud

In the survey of 1,000 UK consumers, Onfido examined the impact of fraud through a human lens to expose how the emotional impact can lead to a breakdown of trust between businesses and consumers.

With many claiming to be ‘digitally savvy’ or able to spot fraud online, those falling victim to fraud often experience a heightened emotional reaction. In fact, one third (33%) of consumers would feel embarrassed as a result, while 46% would feel vulnerable afterwards.

This emotional distress is compounded by the perception that fraud is a personal crime. Seven in ten (70%) UK consumers agree that fraud feels like a personal attack, while over half (56%) agree that fraud victims are often perceived to be at fault, and almost half (44%) agree identity fraud is not treated equally to other forms of crime.

Despite the clear emotional cost, consumers lack belief in the fraud support system. For example, 68% would not bother reporting fraud to the police, no matter the size of the scam, as just over three in ten of those (32%) believe they would not get their money back while 27% would not be confident that appropriate action would be taken.

There are no second chances

As a result, Brits are taking charge of what they can control, which is where they spend their time and money. The survey found there are no second chances for brands when it comes to fraud, as 68% indicate that it would lead to distrust of the associated business.

This not only means reputational damage but a loss of business. In fact, just over two in five (41%) UK consumers would immediately close their financial services account or switch providers in the banking and finance sector, in the event of fraud. Moreover, 34% of consumers would take similar action with businesses in the cryptocurrency sector, while 40% would change online gaming or gambling providers, 37% with telecommunications providers and 34% with healthcare providers.

Re-establishing trust in a digital-first world

Brands have an opportunity to regain consumer trust depending on the security measures used to protect their identities online. In fact, as many as 84% of Brits indicate that security measures can support this process.

When given a choice, consumers specifically point towards multi-factor authentication such as biometric verification (40%) or taking a photo of their ID on their smartphone for instant verification (24%) as measures that would increase their trust in a company with their online identities. Consumers also indicate that these security measures could support trust on social media platforms and prevent misinformation, abuse, and hate speech, as 64% agree they would increase their use of online sites if there were secure identity verification solutions in place to prevent such things.

Commenting on the research, Mike Tuchen, CEO of Onfido, said: “Our research tells us that UK consumers feel the emotional cost of fraud. This emotional cost is as important as the financial impact when it comes to trust in brands. Businesses have a duty to protect their customers and make their digital services and products easy and simple to access online.

“With fraudsters increasingly moving online and deploying increasingly sophisticated tactics, brand trust is eroding due to what many believe to be a victimless crime. It’s up to brands to rebuild trust with effective security measures – like biometric verification. With no second chances on offer, that’s how they will retain custom and protect their reputation in an increasingly digital world.”

Onfido’s study also examines the emotional cost of fraud on 1,000 US consumers. To view the combined US and UK results, and to learn more about how to instil confidence in your ability to verify and protect identities, please visit Onfido’s page here.

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

What Are AI SOC Agents? Use Cases, Architecture, and the Leading Vendors

June 19, 20266 Mins Read

AI-Powered Attacks Become Top Concern for Security Professionals, New Filigran Survey Reveals

June 19, 20265 Mins Read

ShinyHunters targets Oracle PeopleSoft customers through critical zero-day

June 19, 20263 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}