Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - News & Analysis - City Councils’ Disaster Recovery Plans are Encouraging
News & Analysis

City Councils’ Disaster Recovery Plans are Encouraging

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamOctober 29, 20154 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
City Councils’ Disaster Recovery Plans are Encouraging
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

City Councils’ Disaster Recovery Plans are EncouragingFOI request reveals that almost 40 per cent of city councils have not tested their disaster recovery plans in the past year

All of the UK’s major city councils have disaster recovery (DR) plans in place, but as of November 2015 almost 40 per cent of those will not have not tested their plans within the past 12 months.

A Freedom of Information (FOI) request was issued on behalf of disaster recovery specialist Databarracks to the UK’s major cities, including Birmingham, Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, Newcastle, Sheffield and Bristol to determine their plans in the event of an IT disaster. The results showed that all responding councils had DR plans in place to restore essential functionality, including revenue, benefits and welfare services. While these findings are encouraging, it was also revealed that as we approach the end of the year almost 40 (38) per cent of those surveyed have not been regularly tested, despite their absolute necessity in the event of a disaster.

The figure seems especially high when compared to large organisations in the private sector. In Databarracks’ 2015 Data Health Check, they found that only 21 per cent of large private organisations have failed to test their DR plans in the last 12 months – significantly less than the public sector.

Peter Groucutt, managing director of Databarracks explained the findings: “City councils’ attitudes towards DR are excellent. Many councils are prioritising council tax and other business-critical functions in a DR scenario, which serves to protect critical sources of income for the public sector.

“All of the councils that responded to our FOI showed excellent best practice when it came to prioritising the most critical IT systems in a disaster and they all had structured plans in place that outlined their priorities for recovery. This is particularly difficult for the public sector, as not only do they need to protect revenue-generating systems such as council tax, but they also need to protect their care systems such as Children’s Services, for example. To see councils putting so much consideration into disaster recovery planning is very encouraging. There were one or two questionable answers though, with “car parking” being listed as a top priority by one council.

“However, just having a DR plan in place is not enough – plans need to be regularly maintained, updated, revised and tested to guarantee their effectiveness. The results of our FOI request exposed that a significant proportion of city councils had not tested plans for over a year, meaning that they cannot be confident in their effectiveness in the event of a genuine crisis. With services to constituents, such as childcare or benefits, as well as management of income being affected by IT disasters, city councils have a duty to ensure that their DR plan is up to date, tested and verified.

“The best advice we can give is to update your DR plan every time something in your organisation changes. Your plan should give a true and current picture of your entire organisation, and your DR test is what helps find the gaps. If you don’t test your DR plan, these things won’t get picked up until your time of crisis – at which point the damage they could cause is huge.”

The findings also revealed large variances between councils when it came to Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs). In some cases the RTO for a council could be as long as four days, with others able to recover within a few hours. Groucutt commented :

“Earlier in the year we conducted a similar survey across the London Borough councils and it revealed that RTOs could vary from 24 hours to two weeks. This time we looked at how long it would take to retrieve council tax data and the figures showed that this could be as little as two hours for some councils and as long as four days for others.

Groucutt concluded: “It is encouraging to see that all city councils have thorough DR plans in place, but that’s only half the job. To guarantee effectiveness, regular DR testing must be performed and plans must be constantly updated.”

About Databarracks :

Databarracks provides ultra-secure, award winning Disaster Recovery, Backup and Infrastructure services from UK-based, ex-military data centres.

Databarracks is certified by the Cloud Industry Forum, ISO 27001 certified for Information Security and has been named as a “Niche Player” in Gartner’s 2015 Magic Quadrant for DRaaS.

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Disaster Recovery Tactics for Business Continuity

March 28, 202412 Mins Read

Mastering Information Security Governance Frameworks

March 28, 202412 Mins Read

Demystifying Security Architecture in Information Security

March 17, 202413 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}