Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - Study & Research - Cyber Threat Intelligence In Security Operations: 2018 SANS Survey
Study & Research

Cyber Threat Intelligence In Security Operations: 2018 SANS Survey

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamApril 4, 2018Updated:July 4, 20244 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

Cyber Threat Intelligence is Maturing but 62 per cent of Respondents Say Lack of Skilled CTI Professionals is Major Roadblock to Implementation

London, 4 April 2018 – SANS, the largest and most trusted provider of cyber security training and certification to professionals worldwide, has released the results of its annual SANS 2018 Cyber ​​Threat Intelligence Survey. The study sheds light on the evolution of Cyber ​​Threat Intelligence (CTI) in cyber security and shows that CTI is maturing as a discipline.

In one of the clearest trends SANS has seen in the last three years, respondents have increasingly stated that CTI is improving their prevention, detection and response capabilities. In 2018, 81 percent of respondents state their cyber threat intelligence implementations have resulted in improvements, compared to 78 percent in 2017 and 64 percent in 2016. In addition, the number of respondents who answered “unknown” (in other words, they didn’t feel they could answer the question confidently) has more than halved since 2016, jumping from 34 percent in 2016 to 21 percent in 2017, and now to only 15 percent in 2018.

What’s more, 68 percent of respondents say they have implemented CTI this year, and another 22 percent plan to introduce it in the future. Only 11 percent of companies have no plans to do so, falling from the previous year (15 percent). This indicates that CTI is becoming more useful overall, especially to security operations teams that are working hard to integrate intelligence into their prevention, detection and response strategies.

“As the threat landscape continues to change, and with more advanced attackers than ever, security teams need all the help they can get to more effectively prevent, detect and respond to threats,” says the survey’s author, Dave Shackleford, SANS Analyst and Senior Instructor.

CTI skill set in demand

However, finding skilled staff to operate CTI consoles is getting more difficult, according to this year’s report, despite the trends showing that CTI can play an important role in an organisation’s security strategy. In this year’s survey, 62 percent of respondents cite a lack of trained CTI professionals and skills as a major roadblock, an increase of nearly 10 percentage points over 2017 (53 percent). This indicates that the more CTI is used and consumed, the more this skill set is in demand. It may therefore be much more difficult to find staff members who are experienced in setting up and operating CTI programs. Similarly, 39 percent cite a lack of technical ability to integrate CTI tools into the organizational environment.

Better visibility and improved security operations
As a result of their CTI program efforts, respondents report better visibility and improved security operations. For example, 71 percent indicate overall satisfaction with visibility into threats and indicators of compromise (IoCs). When specifying improvements, 70 percent of participants report improved security operations, while 66 percent cite improved ability to detect previously unknown threats.

Responses to the 2018 survey reveal a growing emphasis on CTI being used for security operations tasks: detecting threats (79 percent), incident response (71 percent), blocking threats (70 percent) and threat hunting (a little further down the list at 62 percent). The survey responses indicate that threat intelligence is key in augmenting and improving firewall rules, network access control lists and reputation lists. Known sites and indicators associated with ransomware are then being shared through threat intelligence, allowing operations teams to quickly search for existing compromise and proactively block access from internal clients.

“Fortunately, many organizations are sharing details about attacks and attackers, and numerous open source and commercial options exist for collecting and integrating this valuable intelligence. All of this has resulted in improvements in organizations’ abilities to improve security operations and detect previously unknown attacks,” Shackleford continues.

He summarises the results this way: “These results reinforce the trends we’re seeing that indicate CTI is being primarily aligned with the SOC and is tying into operational activities such as security monitoring, threat hunting and incident response.”

The full report can be found at: https://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/threats/cti-security-operations-2018-cyber-threat-intelligence-survey-38285

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Exploited Faster, Patched Slower: Verizon DBIR 2026 Shows Security Teams Losing Ground

May 20, 20265 Mins Read

Foxconn confirms cyberattack following Nitrogen ransomware claims

May 14, 20263 Mins Read

Security’s Blind Spot: The Threats Hiding in “Low-Severity” Alerts

May 6, 20265 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}