Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - News & Analysis - Executive Order: Fighting Identity Theft with Digital Identity Innovation
News & Analysis

Executive Order: Fighting Identity Theft with Digital Identity Innovation

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamDecember 5, 2014Updated:July 8, 20244 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

In October, President Obama signed an executive order to fight identity theft – an order that primarily focuses on moving the government toward more secure payment cards through chip and PIN-enabled technology. The majority of the media attention around the order focused on this aspect. Section 3 of the order, a mandate ensuring that access to citizens’ personal data is protected behind strong identity authentication, was largely overlooked.

Section 3 states that within 90 days of the date of the Order (which is coming up soon), the National Security Council staff, the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and the Office of Management and Budget shall present a plan consistent with the 2011 National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC) to ensure that “all agencies making personal data accessible to citizens through digital applications require the use of multiple factors of authentication and an effective identity proofing process, as appropriate.”

Featured Download: Social media access at work. Do your employees know the rules?

To meet this requirement, agencies have two main options: high-friction identity proofing (such as employing traditional identity confirmation techniques like questions about past addresses, first cars, or sending passcodes to correlated cell phones) and setting a multi-factor authentication login that a user must remember for that particular website; or employing a federated ID methodology in which a trusted third party identity provider – accredited by the Federal and Identity Credential Access Management Standards (FICAM)— enables a user to have a single, multi-factor login across multiple websites.

The primary problem with the former method is that the current state of multi-factor authentication within government agencies is siloed, and user credentials and passwords are not portable across agencies. This requires citizens to not only remember usernames and passwords for each agency but also remember different multi-factor authentication schemes that are specific to individual agencies.

In this scenario, if a citizen is interacting with the IRS and then also with the Social Security Administration, they will have to undergo identity proofing twice and set up two separate sets of credentials, making it far more taxing to the end-user.

Alternatively, agencies may accept credentials that are already verified and issued by outside identity providers. Besides the obvious benefit of eliminating the requirement to the consumer to create another account, this method proves to be extremely cost effective, as established in a study conducted by NIST. The study found that if the IRS adopted the NSTIC approach of leveraging accredited third-party credentials, the up-front adoption costs would be $40 million to $111 million less than an IRS-only proprietary authentication system, and annual costs would be $2 million to $19 million lower. In the private sector, social media login provider Janrain claims that sites that accept externally issued credentials have conversion rates at least 50% higher relative to those sites that do not accept them.

The executive order reinforces the national strategy that was already laid out in NSTIC and now presents an opportunity to change the paradigm of cybersecurity. Beyond the cost and efficiency savings, a network approach to identity that leverages outside identity providers offers enhanced fraud detection capabilities because the network can detect anomalies if a particular identity is being used too often or in a manner that is associated with malicious intent. These benefits make it clear that by simply leveraging trusted credentials that citizens already possess, government agencies can enable a higher quality, lower cost method of secure authentication while drastically reducing friction to the consumer.

By Ryan Fox, Chief Product Officer, ID.me

About ID.me

id.meID.me is a member-based service that allows members to securely prove their group IDs through our site so military and student members can receive exclusive offers and enjoy shopping online. The personal information members add to their ID.me account is always protected and under your control. The company limits the type of data its partners can request, and at any time members can revoke a partner’s access or delete their account and information entirely.

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

The Real Cost of Inconsistent Third-Party Access

December 18, 20255 Mins Read

What Happens When Devices Cross Borders? The Role of Geofencing in Global IT

August 7, 20256 Mins Read

The Evolving Importance of Identity Governance in FinTech

July 10, 20258 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

No se ha podido establecer conexión. Error 429

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}