Close Menu
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
  • Home
  • Articles
    • Attacks
      • BEC
      • Data Breach
      • DDoS
      • Evasion Attacks
      • Injection
      • Malware
      • MITM
      • Phishing
      • Ransomware
      • RCE
      • Social Engineering
      • Spoofing
      • Spyware
    • Business and Policy
      • BCP and DRP
      • GRC
      • Regulations
    • Data Protection
      • DLP
      • DRM
      • Encryption
      • IAM
    • Future, Trends and Insight
      • AI
      • Events & Community
      • Emerging Tech
      • Expert Panel
      • Interviews With Experts
      • Insights
      • Study & Research
    • Resources
      • Guides
      • Tools
      • Training & Education
    • Security
      • API
      • Apps
      • Cloud
      • Critical Infrastructure
      • Endpoint
      • Hardware
      • IoT
      • Mobile
      • Network
      • OT
      • Port Security
      • Security Architecture
      • Software Development
      • Supply Chain
      • Zero Trust
    • Threats and Vulnerabilities
      • Emerging Threats
      • Insider Threats
      • Risk Management
      • Threat Intelligence
      • Zero Day
  • News and Exclusives
    • Latest News
    • ISB Exclusive
    • Positive News
  • Who We Are
    • About Us
    • Information Security Buzz Expert Panel​
    • Write for Us
    • Media Pack
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
Subscribe
Information Security BuzzInformation Security Buzz
Home - News & Analysis - Fined £200,000 for Failing to Encrypt Police Interviews
News & Analysis

Fined £200,000 for Failing to Encrypt Police Interviews

ISBuzz TeamBy ISBuzz TeamNovember 18, 20153 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Copy Link Email
Fined £200,000 for Failing to Encrypt Police Interviews
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link
Quick AI Summary
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrokPerplexityDeepSeekCopilot

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has been fined £200,000 for failing to encrypt police interviews about violent and sexual crimes stored on laptops that were later stolen. Some of the 43 interviews with victims and witnesses related to historical allegations against “a high-profile individual”, said UK data watchdog the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), which handed down the penalty. Security Experts from Digital Guardian and QA have the following comments on it.

[su_note note_color=”#ffffcc” text_color=”#00000″]Luke Brown, Vice President & GM, Europe Middle East Africa India & Latam at Digital Guardian :

“This case highlights two separate failings made by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), both of which are inexcusable when the nature of the data involved is taken into account. The first is the failure to use any form of encryption or robust endpoint protection on the laptops in question. Numerous affordable technologies exist that can easily protect data in the event of laptop theft or misplacement, making it concerning that there aren’t already stringent policies in place regarding its use at the CPS.

The second failure relates to the security and integrity of the CPS’s own supply chain. Simply assuming that suppliers and partners have adequate protection in place simply isn’t good enough, critical customer information must be protected regardless of where it is in the supply chain, and it is the CPS’s responsibility to make sure that is the case. This can be achieved through routine audits and enforceable policies with suppliers relating to data protection policy and technology usage. We have seen numerous data breaches like this over the last year and whilst businesses and organisations often recover the stolen data, it’s the victims that continue to pay the price.”[/su_note]

[su_note note_color=”#ffffcc” text_color=”#00000″]Richard Beck, Head of Cyber Security at QA :

“The CPS handles videos of police interviews containing sensitive data on a daily basis, which in itself is a big responsibility. However, many organisations like the CPS and its partnering film company are often unaware of all of the possible threats to the sensitive data they’re handling and how to protect against them. When organisation are breached, we should have a minimum expectation that our sensitive data including personally identifiable information (PII) is encrypted, therefore reducing the impact and value of the breached information.”

“As cyber security attacks become more sophisticated, targeted and persistent, organisations must ensure that employees are educated on basic IT security fundamentals. First, timely knowledge of the threats themselves. Second, how to minimise the risk of falling foul of these threats. Third, the agreed plan of action when disaster strikes. The majority of IT security incidents are down to human error, so educating employees will significantly reduce the chances and minimise the impact of your business becoming a victim of cyber crime.”[/su_note]

ISBuzz Team
  • ISBuzz Team
    Air Canada Data Breach: BianLian Extortion Group Claims A Massive Heist Contrary To Airline’s Earlier Statement
  • ISBuzz Team
    Unprecedented DDoS Attack Rocks The Web: Tech Giants Reveal A Digital Tsunami
  • ISBuzz Team
    CISA Flags High-Severity Adobe Acrobat Reader Flaw Amid Active Exploits
  • ISBuzz Team
    Curl Security Alert: Patching A Critical Bug Averting Potential Cyber Catastrophe

The opinions expressed in this post belong to the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Information Security Buzz.

Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

Related Posts

Visual data is the blind spot in enterprise security: that’s about to change

May 4, 20267 Mins Read

Making stolen data worthless: why security must start with the data

March 30, 20265 Mins Read

Meta’s Smart Glasses Privacy Scandal Expands After Sama Credentials Found on the Dark Web

March 10, 20264 Mins Read
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar

 
ISB-Bora-Side-Bar
Black ISB Logo

Information Security Buzz is an independent resource that provides the experts’ comments, analysis, and opinion on the latest Cybersecurity news and topics

X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook RSS

Working With Us

  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Write For Us

  • How To Contribute

The Pages

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • AI Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Copyright Notice

Information Security Buzz and all its contents are copyright © 2014-2025. All rights reserved. All third-party trademarks are recognized.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}